Plastic Macca - Paul is Dead

Deep End: possible PID clue movie?

2012-02-06T10:40:00.000-08:00

A movie starring Jane Asher (former girlfriend of Beatle Paul) from 1971 has been salvaged from obscurity. Was it censored for many decades because it revealed PID clues? The critically-acclaimed film is being re-released on May 6, 2012, so it might be worth watching to see if it reveals anything about James Paul McCartney's fate. It is quite possible, especially considering that another movie by the same director (Judd Bernard) outed the Illuminati's depopulation agenda.

Deep End: pulled from the water

Ryan Gilbey
guardian.co.uk, Sunday 1 May 2011 17.00 EDT

It's not uncommon for movies to drop out of circulation and simply disappear, as fans of Deep End will attest. Barely seen since its release in 1971, the film concerns Mike (played by John Moulder-Brown), a floppy-fringed 15-year-old who becomes dangerously infatuated with Susan (Jane Asher), his co-worker at the public baths. What's unusual about this prolonged absence is that it should have befallen a film so passionately admired. The influential critic Andrew Sarris thought it measured up to the best of Godard, Truffaut and Polanski. The New Yorker's Penelope Gilliatt called it "a work of peculiar, cock-a-hoop gifts". If something as venerated as Deep End can sink, what hope for the rest of cinema?

After years of being mired in rights issues, this vivid, rapturous film is about to return in a restored print. It's appropriate that such an elusive picture should transpire to not be quite what it seems. What could have been just another coming-of-age story is transformed by an absurdist sensibility, uninhibited performances and a heightened use of colour. Although considered a defining British work, as well as one of the most acute screen portraits of London, Deep End is actually a US/German co-production, written and directed by a Pole (Jerzy Skolimowski, best known then for co-scripting Polanski's Knife in the Water), and shot largely in Munich.

There are glimpses of the capital – the exterior of the public baths was in Leytonstone, London, while Soho is the setting for a dreamlike sequence in which Mike visits the boudoir of a prostitute whose leg is in a cast, before purchasing an excessive quantity of hot dogs from Burt Kwouk (Kato from the Pink Panther films).

Jane Asher remembers receiving the script. "It was a bit of a mess," she says. "Jerzy's English wasn't great at the time. I remember sitting up late every night rewriting my dialogue. But Susan was terrific to play. She's at that stage where she's completely aware of her sexual power and uses it ruthlessly. Now that I've got two sons of my own, I feel more protective of Mike, more so than back then, when perhaps I was a bit more like her myself."

Skolimowski maintains that he cast John Moulder-Brown as soon as the 16-year-old walked into his office. ("His charm and innocence were obvious.") The actor has a different recollection. "I was trying to be very sophisticated, smoking cigarettes and being cool," he says now. "I must have looked ridiculous. Jerzy thought I wasn't vulnerable enough, but the producer Judd Bernard persuaded him to give me a screen test, and that convinced him. I was going through the same adolescent period as Mike. Unlike him, I was lucky enough to have had girlfriends, but I still had that rawness. For me it became all about allowing emotions I understood as a teenager to have a life within the context of the scenes."

Despite his youth, Moulder-Brown was undaunted about working so intimately with Asher. "She had broken up with [her fiance] Paul McCartney by then, so there may have been some sensitivity about that – you know, better not start humming any Beatles tunes. But she didn't arrive as a celebrity, just a member of the team." The two actors' easygoing rapport is one of the film's joys, and a consequence of the playful atmosphere fostered by Skolimowski. "Jerzy is very charming," says Asher. "He's not one of those directors who use fear, but you still felt a core of steel. He knew what he wanted."

The cast were free to improvise, and were instructed to remain in character even if a take went awry. "There's a bit where I'm on my bicycle, riding alongside Jane's car," says Moulder-Brown. "I was supposed to stop the bike in front of the vehicle, but it was raining and the brakes didn't work, so the bike skidded, hit the pavement and I went flying. As I was in the air, I remember thinking, 'We've got to keep going because this is going to look great.' When I landed, I could just hear Jerzy calling out: 'Kip feelming! Kip feelming!'"

While the spine of the picture is Mike's growing obsession with Susan, there are priceless incidental pleasures along the way, notably a cameo by Diana Dors as one of the boy's more demanding clients. This blonde typhoon in polka dots makes the bewildered hero an accessory to orgasm, clutching him to her bosom as she conducts aloud a George Best fantasy ("Tackle, dribble, dribble, score!").

"What a lady!" Skolimowski exclaims. "Casting her was such an event. When she put on the ridiculous costume we had prepared, she looked at herself in the mirror and said, 'So. This is how you see me?' I said, 'You look fantastic!'"

"Jerzy would seduce people into doing whatever he wanted them to do," says Moulder-Brown. "In that scene with Di, she really bared her soul: this glamorous star suddenly allowed herself to be that vamping caricature."

Skolimowski's powers of persuasion extended beyond the cast. He had his friend Cat Stevens write But I Might Die Tonight, the movie's opening song. Markedly different was Mother Sky, a grinding 14-minute number by Can that plays during the Soho sequence. The two songs represent opposing impulses in both Mike and the film: the Cat Stevens is tender and hopeful, while the Can is "a bit of a downer", Skolimowski says.

From conception to completion, Deep End took scarcely more than six months. The consensus when it premiered at the Venice film festival in September 1970 was that it would have been a dead cert for the Golden Lion, if only the prize-giving hadn't been suspended the previous year. "The organisers had decided it should all be democratic," grumbles Skolimowski. "Every film equal, or some idiotic idea."

Early indications that the picture's downbeat ending might prove problematic for audiences were felt at the San Francisco film festival. "I was supposed to do a Q&A afterwards," the director says. "The organisers brought me to the cinema, they were so happy – 'Oh, the whole room is laughing and enjoying the film.' Then in the last five minutes the room fell silent. When it finished, there was no applause. They said to me, 'Let's forget the Q&A and go for dinner.' During the meal, some audience members came over and said, 'Look, you had such a fantastic film, 90 minutes of enjoyment and humour. Why did you ruin it with the last five minutes?' I told them, 'You know what? I made the film for those last five minutes.'"

Deep End never matched its critical success at the box office, and was soon relegated to the bottom half of a doomed-love double-bill with Zeffirelli's Romeo and Juliet. "It still seems very fresh to me," says Skolimowksi. "That surprised me. It hasn't aged." Moulder-Brown hasn't seen the film for 40 years. "I don't like watching myself. But I liked Deep End. It had charm. Whenever I went for auditions after that, it was always the one everyone mentioned." Asher believes the film's idiosyncrasies have helped insulate it from the ravages of time. "I don't think it's dated at all. But then it didn't fit its time even when it first came out. It always was an odd one."

• Deep End is rereleased on 6 May.

Deep End
Production year:1970
Country: Rest of the world
Cert (UK): 18
Runtime: 88 mins
Directors: Jerzy Skolimowski
Cast: Christopher Sandford, Diana Dors, Jane Asher, John Moulder-Brown

___________________________________________

Tina Foster

Join the Discussion: Paul is Dead Miss Him forum

Faul McCartney, Templars, and Khashoggi

2012-02-05T15:29:00.000-08:00

Faul McCartney, Templars, and Khashoggi

Paul is Dead Podcast - January 21, 2012

2012-01-22T17:03:00.000-08:00

Paul is Dead Podcast (PID-cast) on January 21, 2012 [LINK]

Andrew Johnson and Tina Foster discuss PID evidence, clues and possible motivations for the murder and replacement of Paul McCartney.

Beatle Paul (left) vs. Faul McCartney (right)

Was Paul McCartney "Replaced" By a "Double" in 1966? [LINK]

This article at Check the Evidence website discusses PID evidence, whistleblowers, and how Paul's image has been co-opted by the powers that be to further the Agenda.

Check the Evidence website [LINK]

Paul is Dead Miss Him forum [LINK]

"Tomorrow Never Knows" & the Tibetan Book of the Dead

2011-10-09T13:17:00.000-07:00

John Lennon wrote "Tomorrow Never Knows," the last track on Revolver, in January 1966. The song has been described by music critic, Richie Unterberger of Allmusic, as "the most experimental and psychedelic track on Revolver, in both its structure and production."

[Source] Some have claimed that the song was written under the influence of the psycho-chemical warfare agent, LSD, and was meant to describe an acid trip. However, the "LSD angle" appears to be a misinterpretation of the song. A re-examination of the song and lyrics reveals that "Tomorrow Never Knows" is actually quite metaphysical. It is describing what one experiences after death.

In the 1960s, prominent Indian yogis began travelling to the West to disseminate their knowledge. The Beatles met Swami Vishnu-Devananda, the founder of Sivandana Yoga, while filming "Help!" in the Bahamas in 1965. Swami gave the lads copies of his book, "The Illustrated Book of Yoga." George Harrison began studying yoga and Eastern religion, and in 1966, he traveled to India to study sitar with Ravi Shankar. [Source]

Harrison's interest in Eastern mysticism appears to have influenced Lennon. According to Peter Brown, the lyrics of "Tomorrow Never Knows" are based on the Tibetan Book of the Dead, also known as Liberation Through Hearing During the Intermediate State and the Bardo Thodol. The text is said to have been composed in the 8th century by Padmasambhava and re- discovered in the 12th century. (Evans-Wentz (1960), p. liv; and, Fremantle & Trungpa (2003), p. xi).

The Bardo Thodol describes what the consciousness experiences after death. The time after death and the interval between death and the next rebirth is known in Tibetan as the bardo, or "liberation." (Fremantle (2001: p.21)). This idea of liberation is related to bodhi in Sanskrit, which means awakening, understanding, or enlightenment. It is also related to nirvana, which means the end of illusion. The Bardo Thodol is recited by Tibetan Buddhist lamas over a dying or recently deceased person "in order for them to recognize the nature of their mind and attain liberation from the cycle of rebirth" [Source]. "Since the deceased's awareness is in confusion of no longer being connected to a physical body, it needs help and guidance in order that enlightenment and liberation occurs. The Bardo Thodol teaches how [one] can attain Nirvana by recognizing the heavenly realms instead of entering into the lower realms where the cycle of birth and rebirth continue." [Source]

The first bardo comes at the very moment of death, when there dawns the Clear Light of the Ultimate Reality. This is the very content and substance of the state of liberation, if only the soul can recognize it and act in a way to remain in that state. The instructions intended to be read at the moment of the person's death are designed to help him do this. He is told, first of all, to embrace this supreme experience not in a selfish and egoistic way but rather with love and compassion for all sentient beings. This will aid him in the second step, which is to realize that his own mind and self is identical with the Clear Light, implying that he himself IS the Ultimate Reality, "the All-good Buddha", transcending time, eternity, and all creation. If he can recognize this while in this supreme state at the moment of death, he will attain liberation-that is, he will remain in the Clear Light forever. This condition is called the "Dharmakaya", the highest spiritual body of the Buddha. [Source]

The lyrics of "Tomorrow Never Knows" describe the period after death when the consciousness is liberated.

Turn off your mind, relax and float down stream It is not dying

The consciousness does not die when the physical body dies.

Lay down all thought Surrender to the void It is shining

That you may see the meaning of within It is being
That love is all and love is everyone It is knowing

In the Tibetan Book of the Dead, the "void" is Reality, the All-Good (Source). It is not nothingness, but rather is "intellect itself, unobstructed, shining, thrilling, and blissful, is the very consciousness, the All-good Buddha." (Id.) The text describes own's own "consciousness, not formed into anything, in reality void, and the intellect, shining and blissful,-these two,-are inseparable. The union of them is the Dharma-Kaya state of Perfect Enlightenment. (Id.) One's "own consciousness, shining, void, and inseparable from the Great Body of Radiance, hath no birth, nor death, and is the Immutable Light-Buddha Amitabha." (Id.)

That ignorance and hate may mourn the dead It is believing

The ignorant mourn the dead. They do not understand the opportunity death offers. It is a chance to be liberated from the cycle of birth, death, and re-birth.

But listen to the color of your dreams It is not living

"The Bardo Thodol teaches that once awareness is freed from the body, it creates its own reality as one would experience in a dream." (Source) This state is not living, it is not dying. It is simply being.

Or play the game existence to the end of the beginning

If a soul does not attain liberation, s/he will be drawn back into the cycle of birth and death.

As I have stated in the past, I do not believe the Beatle pushed the LSD agenda. I feel that this song has been falsely interpreted in order to make it seem as though the Beatles promoted LSD. I hope this re-interpretation will help shed Light on what I believe Lennon was trying to accomplish: using songs and music to help educate and enlighten others.

Tina Foster

Join the discussion: Paul is Dead: Miss Him forum

1965 Melody Maker interview with Paul McCartney

2011-08-04T12:35:00.000-07:00

In this interview from the March 27, 1965 issue of "Melody Maker," James Paul McCartney talked about not telling Beatles' fans what to do. If you read the article carefully, you might pick up on some incongruities, such as Paul saying he would never leave England, yet he supposedly went to live in Scotland a few years later.

The most telling aspect about the article, in my opinion, is that Paul and the other Beatles refused to tell their fans not to drink. It is hard to imagine the Beatles being used to further an agenda, especially pushing LSD, if they were not team-players. Paul makes it clear in this interview they would not exploit their popularity to influence people to do anything.

********

During the group's stay in Austria, John Lennon was angered by the crowds who flocked to the set, ruining assorted shots; and he let them know it, loudly, most definitely and often crudely. Charm was not one of his major personality quirks. That was more Paul than anyone else in the group. George was funny, Ringo was a comedian, John was abrasive, and Paul was confident and often charming, perhaps more conscious of the press than the others. Not that he courted publicity. He was simply more thoughtful. Over dinner at the Hotel Edelweiss in Obertauern, Austria, he spoke with Coleman. Asked Coleman, "Do you think you have some sort of responsibility to your fans? Do they look up to you?"

PAUL: "No, it would probably be a nicer answer if I said yes, we have a responsibility to fans. But I can't be noble for the sake of it. The answer's no. I don't believe we have any responsibility frankly, and it takes a bit of saying. It's insulting the intelligence of a lot of young people to say we have. We used to get requests from people, asking us if we'd go to a meeting and tell loads of people they shouldn't drink. What do they take us for? We'd get laughed at if we said the youth of Britain shouldn't drink. It'd be bloody impertinent. I haven't the right to interfere with anybody else's life. Do you think just because a Beatle said, 'Don't go beating people up.' the crime figures would go down? They wouldn't. And it's a cheek to expect us to do it. And I'd feel a right nit saying, 'Thou shalt not drink'."

COLEMAN: "Is the image of the Beatles changing?"

PAUL: "Yes I think it is. At least I do feel it is switching a bit now. Let's get one thing clear though. It's other people looking at us that creates the image. We can't create it. We can just notice it and sort of say, 'Ah, well...' I think it is good that it's changing, as well. You ask how is it changing? I'd hesitate to use the word maturing. That word has certain connotations. People who are mature are respectable, ordinary, and I think dull. They use the word mature when what they mean is that people are in a rut. I hope we're not mature. My feeling about our changing image is this: Everybody goes through certain stages of growing up. For us, this is one of them. People are simply realising that we're growing up."

COLEMAN: "How will you feel, how will you react, if 'A Ticket to Ride' does not go immediately to number one?"

PAUL: "It would be a terrible drag and then I'll really pay attention to the knockers who say the Beatles are slipping. I mean, think of those horrible quotes we'd have to give people. 'Proves there's room for everybody.' we'd say, if it goes in the chart at number fifteen. Seriously, if it doesn't get to the top first go, I'd say damn and blast it, because as you know I never swear. I might say flipping heck! Come off it. Truthfully, I'd feel very depressed and I'd be in a disappointed mood."

COLEMAN: "Do you expect it will hit number one immediatly?"

PAUL: "It's not a question of expecting, but hoping. It's always hope rather than expectancy. Once you start expecting success you get blase'. We'll never get to the stage of releasing rubbish because we know people will buy it. Disaster. We've always been terrified with each new release and we're the same now. We like it, but people might hate it and that's their right. This business of singles has always been a real worry for us, and I mean this because every time, we've tried for something different and we have done it this time. Not that we've got the Black Dyke Mills Band backing us! The worst attitude anybody in the chart can have is: 'The last one did ok so this one will.' All I can say is, let us pray."

COLEMAN: "Are the Beatles knockers moving in?"

PAUL: "One thing on this subject has always struck me as stupid. You get people who say things like: 'A bit of criticism is always good for you. Being taken down a peg and getting advice never hurt anyone.' It's a load of rubbish. I've never met anyone yet who liked being criticised, even when the criticism was meant as advice. Let's face it, our knockers aren't interested in helping us, or giving us advice. They're simply malicious. Another thing I hate is where somebody tells you his opinion after the event, you know the sort, 'Well, if you want my honest opinion, I didn't like it in the first place.' We've had a lot of that and we hate it. It's cowardly. We've always been worried about knockers. Isn't everyone? If somebody walked up to another person in the street and said, 'That's a lousy jacket you're wearing,' he'd be a knocker. And the bloke wearing the jacket would hate it; so do we. If the knockers are moving in now, we don't like it. We don't like Clever Henrys."

COLEMAN: "What are your feelings about invasion of privacy?"

PAUL: "Mainly yes, we resent it a bit. It depends on my mood. If I'm away on holiday and photographers start chasing, I get fed up. But if the photographer's okay and asks if I'd pose for a picture or something, and he's reasonable about it, I'm not annoyed. After all, you've got to face the fact the press is after you, haven't you? It's when people start sneaking pictures and wrecking a private holiday that I get temperamental."

COLEMAN: "What do you think of John's idea of becoming a record producer in partnership with you?"

PAUL: "I don't mind the idea, as long as he lets me set up the mics for him. Just to keep my hand in, like. Seriously I'd love it. It'd be a challenge."

COLEMAN: "What do you dislike about show business?"

PAUL: "Shaving. Right, I'll answer that properly. Those daft people who go back stage after an opening night and say, 'Dahling, you were super.' Women in show business who swear like troopers to make everybody know they are in show business. Show biz women who act like men. I hate this type. All the 'Oh dahling types. Horrible. Also people who talk around, calling each other 'love'. Not the 'luv' that shop assistants in the North mean, but the show biz 'love'. This type is often the floor manger on a TV show. It is so affected. They think these affectations make them individual. Actually they are following every known rule in the book and falling into every possible show biz trap that makes them UN-individual. To me, this is one of the drags of show business."

John iterrupted saying, "That's it, Paul. Have a bash. Have a go."

COLEMAN: "How aware are you of personal images?"

PAUL" "I used to panic about images, because I'm very easily influenced, impressionable, truthfully. I used to worry about whether we should smoke on photographs. Then I realised it would be daft not to. I used to panic about being seen anywhere with Jane, because I used to have this old fashioned idea that recording people were never seen out with girlfriends. Now, I don't care much. No, these things don't matter to me or any of us, because we don't really believe in images. We never talk about them, except to send up the word image."

COLEMAN: "How would you define a hanger on?"

PAUL: "There are various kinds of hangers on, we find. Some hang on because they can tell their friends they've met the Beatles. Big deal.Some hang on because it's their job to do so. The very worst kind of hanger on is the one you discover was a hanger on three weeks after he's left your company."

COLEMAN: "Do you think anyone will ever have greater success than the Beatles?"

PAUL: "Yes. I think they might easily. Nobody thought Elvis's successes could ever be surpassed, but I think we might have surpassed one or two of his, haven't we?"

COLEMAN: "Would you ever leave Britain to live abroad?"

PAUL: "No definitely not. Out of everywhere I've been, I like England best."
And George added, "Leave England? Never. Best country in the world to live in."

COLEMAN: "How would you like to be remembered?"

PAUL: "With a smile."
John replied, "I won't be interested in being remembered. I'll be in a mental home and Melody Maker will run articles saying, 'Now, direct from the mental home, we present John Lennon in Blind Date.' No I'd like to be remembered as the one with the twinkle in his eye."

George said, "I just don't care." And Ringo added, "I'd like to be remembered as Mrs. Starkey's little boy."

********

Paul is remembered with a smile... and gratitude.

Tina Foster

Paul is Dead: Miss Him Forum

Were the Beatles angels?

2011-06-18T14:26:00.000-07:00

Today, June 18, 2011, would have been Paul McCartney's 69th birthday. In honor of that occasion, I would like to indulge in some wild speculation as to whether he and the other Beatles were angels.

Timothy Leary once declared "that The Beatles [were] Prototypes of evolutionary agents sent by God, endowed with a mysterious power to create a new human species, a young race of laughing freemen." (As quoted in Shout! (1981) by Philip Norman, p. 365; and in An Encyclopedia of Quotations about Music (1981) by Nat Shapiro, p. 303 [Link])

The Maharishi Mahesh Yogi told "George and Deepak Chopra that he could never be upset at the Beatles because he always knew they were angels on earth."

[Source: Beatles: Angels on Earth?]

The photographer of some unpublished photos of the Beatles also noted something special about the Pre-Fab Four: "I knew they were going to be successful because they had an aura, and months later they were world famous..."

[Source: "The Beatles new release: Unpublished pictures to go on display after they sat in an attic for 50 years"]

Charles Manson also believed the Beatles were angels, and that Revolution 9 from the White Album was a reference to the Holy Bible’s Revelations 9:

Revelations 9
From the Holy Bible

And in those days men shall seek death, and shall not find it; and
shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.

And the shapes of the locusts like unto horses prepared unto battle;

And on their heads as it were crowns like gold, and their faces as the faces of men.
And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as of lions.

And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their
wings was like the thundering of many horses and chariots rushing into battle.

And they had tails like unto scorpions, with stingers; with their
tails they had power to harm people for five months.

The locusts = The locusts can be an interpretation of insects, bugs or maybe beetles. The Beatles

Faces of men = The Beatles being men had faces of men.
As the hair of women = The Beatles had faces of men and the hair of women. Very original and unique to them for a time.

Breastplates of iron = their guitars with metal strings strapped to their chests
Sound like thundering horses and chariots rushing into battle = the sound of The Beatle’s loud amplified music.

Their tails they had power = The Beatles’ amplifiers had electric chords,
power chords= This is interesting in that the tails were not described as having venom or poison but instead “power.”

[Source: The Lennon Prophecy: A New Examination of the Death Clues of the Beatles]

In this back-masking done by Sunssol, it appears that the Beatles reject money, and seek peace and passion:

I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie

Ah...real tickets without peace
Ah, ah, ah, real tickets without peace
Ah, real tickets without peace...so
Here we burn and no peace
We now can reverse, now reversed
Ah...real tickets without peace
Ah, ah, ah, real tickets without peace
Ah, real tickets without peace...so
Heaven will watch it and we will all suffer
We now can reverse, now reversed...we will
We then have passion

At 6:20, this back-masking reveals "Paul is hare Krishna."

Krishna was the 8th incarnation of Vishnu.

...Saturn, the ascendant lord, acts as the Vishnu planet...
So it is clear that Saturn is representing Vishnu...

[Source: ]http://www.osfa.org.uk/pt.htm

George wrote "Gopala Krishna," which was never released:

It is said that "[B]irds often symbolize the divine. They are often viewed as gods in disguise, or else they are the vehicles of gods and goddesses..."

[Source: Swan at http://www.khandro.net/animal_bird_swan.htm]

In Faul's video for the song, "This One," reference seems to be made to such an entity:

On the cover of Sgt. Pepper, is Faul trying to make a connection between himself and Vishnu/Krishna?

Terry Knight sang in "St. Paul":

"I think there's something wrong

It's taking you too long to change the world
Sir Isaac Newton told you it would fall."

Does this mean that Paul was supposed to change the world for the better but was thwarted by being replaced by someone who played for the "other team?"

David Icke forum member, Jo_6, made this observation:

...The original Beatles were a massive force for the light!
They were laughing lovely men who gave you a warm feeling inside, wrote ace music and obviously thoroughly enjoyed performing it live. I believe they were a massive force of goodness and love, with like an etheric gold shining energy coming from them.

The dark controlling forces do not let this be when it occurs in a way that effects the masses. (Look at JFK and Bob Marley). They do not want Light forces of truth and goodness to effect the masses and lift us up and wake us up. So they stamp on it and suppress it, snuff it out, nip it in the bud. And , perhaps this is what happened to the Beatles. They were a massive force that effected the masses, and they weren't going to 'co-operate' with the dark controlling forces...so they were took out. And to carry on with the juggernaut powerboat that was the Beatles, to keep cashing in and using them as a tool to manipulate the masses, they were replaced. Anyone close was bought off, or threatened, scared into submission...

[Source: David Icke Forum link]

Philip Norman, author of "Shout!," referred to the Beatles as "supernatural" in an interview at the beginning of this video:

These are all questions with no easy answers. They are interesting to ruminate and speculate upon, however.

~ Tina Foster

PID Miss Him Forum

Ringo: "I am the last remaining Beatle." Repeat: "I am the last remaining Beatle."

2011-05-22T15:05:00.000-07:00

With the distance between the eyes made equal, it is easy to tell that
Mop-Top Paul was replaced by a fraudster

In this article excerpted below, Ringo Starr claims to be the last remaining Beatle. It is played off as a "joke," but even Ringo admits there is an "element of truth to it." As followers of this blog know, it has been proven by forensic evidence that Paul McCartney was replaced circa 1966.

How many hints do these people need to drop before people start thinking *maybe* there is something to PID? It was stated that Ringo was the last remaining Beatle not once, but *twice* in the same article - just in case you didn't catch it the first time. Please, read between the lines! They are not going to just tell you Paul was replaced.

'Paul likes to think he's the only remaining Beatle': Ringo Starr on why the world's most famous band was lucky to have him

By COLE MORETON

Last updated at 10:00 PM on 21st May 2011

...

‘You all know that the only person round this table who can go is me. I was in the biggest rock ’n’ roll band in the history of music… I am the last remaining Beatle.’ ...

The best jokes are based on truth...

‘There is an element of truth in it,’ Ringo says, before pausing for thought.

‘But I think it’s people on the outside who perceive Paul as thinking he’s the only one left. Actually, it’s me. I am the last remaining Beatle.’ ...

[M]aybe Ringo is the one who has stayed closest to the original spirit of the Beatles...

_______________________________________

Tina Foster

Paul is Dead Miss Him Forum

Troll hacked Tina's email - sending hateful emails

2011-05-20T17:01:00.001-07:00

"Misery" by t
he Beatles

I received this email from someone today who received an email from a hacker using my email account. I want to assure everyone that I am not sending anyone hateful or threatening emails. I strongly suspect the perpetrator is Kathryn O'Connor, located in Detroit, Michigan. Here is the text of the email:

Hello, I decided to message you because at first I was just going to
sent you back a message saying f-off, but then realized that some ill
little troll must have just hijacked your credentials and used your
basic info to email me and several other people of my site.

Do you know anyone in or around the Detroit area with IPs of
71.205.174.11 & 71.205.170.49 and another with some kinf of
store/business IP that wants to harass you by using your email to send
hateful messages?

If you have your own forum you should alert your members that whoever
this weirdo is, has been using your email and trying to threaten
(through you) a member of mine... Please tell people that
[she] is not any of those things! And that the weirdo using your
email is using IPs based around the Detroit area and coming from a
store computer. Probably to mask their real identity.

If you have received an email ostensibly from me that is hateful or threatening, then it is from the hacker, and not from me. I have now reset my password to prevent further hack attacks. If you have received one of these emails, please do not be afraid to email me so that I can set it straight. Thanks!

Tina Foster

Paul is Dead Miss Him Forum

*******

I received an update about the hack attack (5/21/2011):

I did some investigating on that other IP. It's public, and available
right here, as the IP trace showed very easily.

76.241.189.105

IP Address: 76.241.189.105
Host: adsl-76-241-189-105.dsl.sfldmi.sbcglobal.net
Location: US, United States
City: Leonard, MI 48367
Organization: SBC Internet Services
ISP: SBC Internet Services

Tracerouting showing as a
naturalfoodpatch.com

And a web address
http://www.naturalfoodpatch.com/

The other 2 IP links are from a comcast connection...
I looked further into it, the store owner's name is JJ...
*******

Update 5/26/2011: Another person who got a hate-email from my account that Kathryn hacked into emailed me today to say that she thought Kathryn had help hacking the account. This person told me about a forum where Kathryn's victims can commiserate about their stalking and harassment experiences.  Apparently, they call her "Misery." The board dates back to at least 2007, so Kathryn has been at it for a while. Sadly, Kathryn got into the board once through a proboards glitch and harvested the email addresses, but the glitch has been fixed since. 
Private Support Group for Survivors of Stalking
This is the same troll who asked members of the hak5 forum to help her hack into the Paul is Dead Miss Him forum and take it down [see post from Dec. 2010].

Is it McCartney or is it an imposter? By DAVID BRINN

2011-05-01T23:45:00.000-07:00

Repost of a Jerusalem Post PID article from 2008...

Sep 24, 2008 10:05 | Updated Sep 25, 2008 12:22

Is it McCartney or is it an imposter?

By DAVID BRINN

Some 40,000 fans are expected to pack Yarkon Park Thursday night to see Paul McCartney perform his classic songs. But will it really be the former Beatle taking the stage, or will it be Billy Shears? Or maybe William Campbell?

Some 40 years after first surfacing, the legend that the former Beatle died in a fiery 1966 car accident and was subsequently replaced by a look-alike, sound-alike imposter still attracts considerable attention and scrutiny. Books, research articles, Web sites, university lectures and presentations have all focused on the plethora of clues that weave together one of the more outlandish but mystifying conspiracy theories that evolved from the 1960s.

"At the time, people took it very seriously," recalled the "dean" of "Paul-is-dead" theorists, retired Delaware high school teacher Joel Glazier.

"It was the end of the '60s. You have to remember this was against the backdrop of the assassinations of Martin Luther King [Jr.] and Bobby Kennedy, as well as the Vietnam War and the Pentagon Papers. So this sounded like the perfect conspiracy cover-up. People stayed up all night talking about it, and some were actually quite scared."

lazier spoke to The Jerusalem Post from Toronto, where he was a featured speaker at a Beatles convention, along with former John Lennon girlfriend May Pang and ex-Ringo Starr paramour Nancy Andrews.

Glazier initially rose to prominence in the Beatles scholarly world in 1979 by publishing a 30-page comprehensive research article on the issue for the premier Beatles fan magazine, Strawberry Fields Forever, which attracted the attention of Beatles convention organizers.

Since then, Glazier has been a mainstay on the convention and college campus circuit, both in the US and Europe. But he's not just a conspiracy theorist - he's also a bona fide Beatles expert, and has been hired by the Delaware school system to present lectures to students on the importance of The Fab Four in popular culture.

For those too young - or too old - to remember the "Paul is dead" theory, it goes something like this: McCartney perished in a 1966 London car crash, but The Beatles, not wanting to make it public, used their clout to keep the tragedy secret. They hired the winner of a McCartney look-alike contest to take his place in the band, a lucky guy with the name of either William Shears Campbell, Billy Shears (the name of the fictitious leader of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band) or William Sheppard.

What gave fuel to the fire were a slew of supposed hints to the switcheroo that fans gleaned from Beatles' lyrics, photos and album covers, first exposed in a college newspaper article and then picked up by a Detroit radio station, before breaking worldwide with extensive coverage on all major TV and print media.

"I think you have to pay tribute to the cover of Abbey Road for starting it all," said Glazier. "The four Beatles are walking across the street, in what looks like could be a funeral procession. John's in white, the religious leader, Ringo's in a tux - the funeral director, George is in work jeans, the grave digger. And Paul, he's barefoot and out of the step with the others. People interpreted that as alluding to the practice of burying people barefoot.

"In addition, he's holding a cigarette in his right hand, and he was famous for being a left-handed bass player, a sign that this Paul is an imposter. And finally, there's the license plate on the Volkswagen in the background - which reads LMW 28-IF, which was interpreted to mean 'Linda McCartney widow, and Paul would have been 28 'if' he hadn't died in 1966."

From there, fans went backwards to albums like 1967's Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, which they claim houses a dozen more clues within the photo imagery on the front and back covers - including the back cover photo of the group with three of the Beatles facing forward and McCartney turned backward, with the words "Without you" printed next to his head from the song title "Within You Without You."

The cover of 1968's The Magical Tour shows three Beatles sporting red roses on their lapels, while McCartney's is black; and of course, Lennon supposedly sings "I buried Paul" at the end of "Strawberry Fields Forever."

And the list goes on - seemingly random details that, when combined together, might result in something more meaningful, according to Glazier.

"It certainly wasn't serendipity. Even if somebody could explain away one or two of the clues, how can you explain 70 of them? There were no coincidences when it came to The Beatles - everything was a precise, conscious decision, from the music to the album art," said Glazier, who discusses the phenomenon with a coyness of someone who loves keeping the legend alive.

He pointed to other chronological occurrences which he says provide additional ammunition of an upheaval in the Beatles world, as caused by McCartney's death.

"During 1967, when Sgt. Pepper's came out, The Beatles stopped performing live because the new Paul wasn't up to playing in public. And by 1970, the band had conveniently broken up and no longer had to deal with the questions. And some would say that since The Beatles years, the quality of Paul's songwriting is not what it once was. But that's a judgment call," said Glazier.

But according to Israeli Beatles historian Yarden Uriel, Hebrew author of two books on the group, the "Paul is dead" theorists are simply forgetting the main argument against acceptance of an imposter McCartney - human nature.

"Just because they were The Beatles, it doesn't mean that they don't behave in the same way that real people do, and that they interact with people in the same way as we do," said Uriel.

"Let's assume for a minute that Paul really did die and was replaced by a look-alike. The Beatles were very strong people individually - John, George and even Ringo.

"Do you think they would let this new guy come in and dominate the band, as Paul did on Sgt. Pepper's and all the way to Abbey Road and Let it Be?It's human nature that he would be relegated to the back and Lennon would take over the band. It's just not plausible. But people want to believe it because they like conspiracies. It's a great sociological study."

(Continued from page 1 of 2 )

For Glazier, though, it's been something more - a 40-year obsession. He won't profess whether he thinks McCartney is really dead. "I don't really know if Paul is dead or not. I'm too busy looking for clues."

But in addition to the popular conclusions that the clues were a hoax instigated by The Beatles either as a elaborate joke or to boost album sales, both of which have been denied by all four Beatles in the past, Glazier does offer some additional reasons as to why The Beatles may have initiated an intricate trail of "Paul is dead" clues.

"One of the theories is that the clues were introduced by The Beatles as a kind of tribute to their original bass player Stu Sutcliffe, who left them before they became popular," he said.

Another theory says that Lennon's love of wordplay and studio editing led to some clues in later albums, but that after cult leader Charles Manson attributed his killing spree in part to "hidden messages" in the song "Helter Skelter," the band members chose not to reveal the joke.

And then, going to the extreme, there are conspiracies that tie in everything from a Faustian deal with Satan to a Rosemary's Baby-Mia Farrow-Roman Polansky-Sharon Tate-Manson connection.

However, Glazier prefers to focus on the clues more than the reasons they might have been devised. And even more than the clues, he prefers to focus on The Beatles as a cultural phenomenon and revels in his Beatle fanhood.

Having visited Israel eight times, and being instrumental in the establishment of the John Lennon Peace Forest in the Galilee, Glazier is overjoyed that a Beatle is finally appearing in Israel. "Finally, the people of Israel will get to see the person who is allegedly Paul. And make sure you write 'he said that with a smile,'" said Glazier.

I think this is a wonderful thing for Israel, and for Paul. I've always found a sophisticated musical audience there and Paul, being the most successful musician in the world, should be playing there."

Glazier was one of the 250,000 fans who enjoyed McCartney's performance in July for Quebec's 400th anniversary and he said the Tel Aviv crowd would not be disappointed.

"It was an absolutely dynamic concert. I couldn't believe that somebody who's supposed to be 66 has such energy. And I also couldn't believe the quality of the sound, no matter where you stood, and the crystal clear big screens. I never saw so much detail given to those elements," said Glazier.

However, he can't help concluding by introducing another shadow of a doubt.

"Whoever this person is, he can certainly play well. But I still think there's something missing. Is that voice singing 'Yesterday' the same voice that sang it in 1965? You decide."

Raw Story article on Air Force's use of virtual people to manufacture fake consensus

2011-02-20T10:28:00.000-08:00

An army of virtual people try to convince people that Paul McCartney

and "Faul" are the same person - despite obvious physical differences.

A blog-buddy sent me this article today. It is about how the government hires disinfo agents to pose as multiple users on forums to manufacture a fake consensus. PID Truthers have encountered this on ATS and the David Icke forum. PIAgents will register under several usernames, then make it seem like more people agree with them (especially when they back "each other" up). These shenanigans are being exposed. We know what we are up against in our quest to out the Truth about Paul McCartney's replacement. Below are excerpts of the article pertinent to PID. Please click on the article's title to read the full article.

~ Tina Foster

Join the discussion: PID Miss Him forum

Revealed: Air Force ordered software to manage army of fake virtual people

Stephen C. Webster
Friday, February 18th, 2011 -- 3:07 pm

These days, with Facebook and Twitter and social media galore, it can be increasingly hard to tell who your "friends" are.

But after this, Internet users would be well advised to ask another question entirely: Are my "friends" even real people?

In the continuing saga of data security firm HBGary, a new caveat has come to light: not only did they plot to help destroy secrets outlet WikiLeaks and discredit progressive bloggers, they also crafted detailed proposals for software that manages online "personas," allowing a single human to assume the identities of as many fake people as they'd like.

The revelation was among those contained in the company's emails, which were dumped onto bittorrent networks after hackers with cyber protest group "Anonymous" broke into their systems...

"There are a variety of social media tricks we can use to add a level of realness to all fictitious personas," it said.

Government involvement

Eerie as that may be, more perplexing, however, is a federal contract from the 6th Contracting Squadron at MacDill Air Force Base, located south of Tampa, Florida, that solicits providers of "persona management software."

While there are certainly legitimate applications for such software, such as managing multiple "official" social media accounts from a single input, the more nefarious potential is clear.

Unfortunately, the Air Force's contract description doesn't help dispel suspicions. As the text explains, the software would require licenses for 50 users with 10 personas each, for a total of 500. These personas would have to be "replete with background , history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturally and geographacilly consistent."

It continues, noting the need for secure virtual private networks that randomize the operator's Internet protocol (IP) address, making it impossible to detect that it's a single person orchestrating all these posts. Another entry calls for static IP address management for each persona, making it appear as though each fake person was consistently accessing from the same computer each time...

Manufacturing consent

Though many questions remain about how the military would apply such technology, the reasonable fear should be perfectly clear. "Persona management software" can be used to manipulate public opinion on key information, such as news reports. An unlimited number of virtual "people" could be marshaled by only a few real individuals, empowering them to create the illusion of consensus.

You could call it a virtual flash mob, or a digital "Brooks Brothers Riot," so to speak: compelling, but not nearly as spontaneous as it appears.

That's precisely what got DailyKos blogger Happy Rockefeller in a snit: the potential for military-run armies of fake people manipulating and, in some cases, even manufacturing the appearance of public opinion...

"That's me. I believe there are many people though who will base their judgment on rumors and mob attacks. And for those people, a fake mob can be really effective." ...

Other e-mails circulated by HBGary's CEO illuminate highly personal data about critics of the US Chamber of Commerce, including detailed information about their spouses and children, as well as their locations and professional links. The firm, it was revealed, was just one part of a group called "Team Themis,"tasked by the Chamber to come up with strategies for responding to progressive bloggers and others.

"Team Themis" also included a proposal to use malware hacks against progressive organizations, and the submission of fake documents in an effort to discredit established groups.

HBGary was also behind a plot by Bank of America to destroy WikiLeaks' technology platform, other emails revealed. The company was humiliated by members of "Anonymous" after CEO Aaron Barr bragged that he'd "infiltrated" the group...

______________________

Max Keiser discusses this beginning at 10 minutes in:

Beatles on Ed Sullivan in February 1964

2011-02-09T09:17:00.000-08:00

Today, February 9, is the anniversary of the Beatles' historic 1964 appearance on the Ed Sullivan Show. The Beatles were charming, witty, and incredibly talented. They were a force (for good) to be reckoned with. Let us remember what was and ponder what could have been had their names and identities not been co-opted to serve a dark agenda, such as promoting LSD (see Agents for Change: Beatles, LSD, and Social Engineering).

~ Tina Foster

Join the discussion: Paul is Dead Miss Him Forum

PIAgent calls for Paul is Dead Miss Him forum to be hacked and taken down

2010-12-20T17:31:00.000-08:00

I got this email today from a concerned citizen at the hak5 forum informing me that "KathrynO" had asked for help to hack into and destroy the Paul is Dead Miss Him Forum. The email in pertinent part reads as follows:

It seems Psycho Stalker has come back under an alias and asked that your site is destroyed and for any hacker willing to hack into Paul McC.'s boards to retrieve private information.

http://www.hak5.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17764&st=0&p=169016&#entry169016

This is serious because she is breaking the law by soliciting a hacker to break into secure computer networks.

Here is what "KathrynO" posted at that link:

... Now I need help. The forum I joined concerns Paul McC, the biggest there is on this planet, and I know my stalker(s) who are also PID fraeks have been contacting the admins of this forum and are talking about me. I need to be able to get access to these conversations and maybe if all else fails get this forum destroyed also... Thanks guys, KathrynO

Needless to say, no one is stalking this woman. However, it is true that a number of people have contacted me about her stalking them.

At any rate, should someone hack the PID Miss Him forum, then we will know who is behind it and can take appropriate action.

UPDATE: Kathryn O'Connor of Detroit admitted she had ProBoards delete the Paul is Dead Miss Him forum. But never fear. There is a new PID MH forum here. Please join us!

~ Tina Foster

Join the discussion: PID Miss Him forum

PID Interview on AxXiom Rule of Law Radio now available (updated)

2010-12-20T00:10:00.000-08:00

Tina Foster's interview from November 12, 2010 with Andrew Griffin on AxXiom Rule of Law Radio discussing the replacement of Paul McCartney is now available in the archives.

A4L_2010-11-12_128k.mp3

A4L_2010-11-12_16k.mp3

The PID, Beatles, & the 60's discussion starts at about 20 minutes in.

UPDATE: Comments from guest blogger, Getsmart, about the show:

[Note] that Tina Foster's arrival on the show is at minute 19':45" just so folks don't miss out on any of the revelations made or the highly deserved Intro reserved for this leading edge Truth Seeker investigating the program of Celebrity Replacements perpetrated by the CIA among other agencies and organizations.

I especially like the part about sharing the experience of first discovering that Sir Faul is not Paul and how once you open your eyes there is no going back plus the fact that this opens a Huge Can of Worms...

I will quote the radio host Andrew Griffin at minute 25':50" saying "I've looked at these comparative photos of Paul from 66 and before, and post that time - it's shocking how different they are, and that people couldn't notice that? Um, that's just a normal thing, why would that be different?"

Andrew Griffin also said the following at minute 29':00": "I also noticed that the veins in his hands, where he's playing the bass, were different! And how do you... you can't change that! So, I would say that's... I mean, there are all these clear clues that this is a different person. That's what just amazed me that more people aren't talking about this. Tina, we've got to go to a break here, but we'll be back and talk more about... Paul, Paul McCartney, call him what you will. He's not the guy we knew on Ed Sullivan back in '64, that's for sure!" His colleague Howard then chimes in with "we're talking about Paul or Faul, the NOT REAL Paul McCartney." with Andrew picking up the ball and referring to "that man who claims to be Sir Paul McCartney".

Folks, this was on national radio and has reached countless people who were either wondering why they had that uneasy feeling in the pit of their stomach when it came to Faul's McCartney vaudeville circus or who never knew the original James Paul McCartney and had never had a chance to compare his physique or his talent with the lame replacement substitute - Faul being to Paul what Aspartame is to Sugar.

I commend Tina for advancing the spirit of our ongoing investigation into the death of Paul by the appeal made on public radio broadcast for information regarding the suspicious death of Mal Evans at the hands of the Los Angeles County Police, which is in all probability tied to the murder of James Paul McCartney and his replacement by an Impostor.

The host of Truth Radio's AxXiom for Liberty program is an interesting and well informed person. For example, at minute 54':00" he talks about how many rock groups of the sixties had ties to the Military Industrial Complex and were coordinated out of Laurel Canyon, bringing the discussion with Tina onto the topic of TPTB orchestrating a 'controlled opposition' and extending their agenda through the CIA's MK-Ultra Mind Control Program to topple our civilization and bring on Helter Skelter as promoted by Charles Manson, embraced by Sir Faul and fomented by satanic rock groups all of whom endorse Aleister Crowley, the Beast 666 and co-founder of the Tavistock Institute for social engineering and cultural control.

Join the discussion: Paul is Dead Miss Him Miss Him Miss Him.

We can work it out

2010-12-02T19:44:00.000-08:00

1/25/03 Daily Telegraph (London) 27

2003 WLNR 4174791

Daily Telegraph (UK)

January 25, 2003

Section: NEWS

We can work it out

Craig Brown

Sub-Section:Way of the World

POSTER companies in America have airbrushed a cigarette from the hand of PaulMcCartney on the Beatles' Abbey Road album cover. They have performed this Leninist gesture in response to the anti-smoking lobby. In the late Sixties, the cigarette in question played a key role in a widely held conspiracy theory concerning the death of Paul McCartney. The rumour was rife that McCartney had died in a car crash, and had been replaced by a lookalike. On the cover of Abbey Road, "Paul" is barefoot (corpses are often buried without shoes), and his eyes are closed, as if dead. He is also out of step with the rest. The other Beatles are wearing tell-tale clothing: Ringo, dressed in black, is the pallbearer, George, in denim, is the gravedigger, and John, all in white, is the preacher. Behind them is a Volkswagen with the number plate "28 IF", signifying that Paul would have been 28 years old if he had lived. Furthermore - and this is where this week's news comes in - the lookalikePaul is holding his cigarette in his right hand, whereas every Beatles fan knows that the real Paul is left-handed. Spooky, indeed. It is quite a while - at least 25 years, in fact - since I last heard anyone repeating this great mound of evidence with a furrowed brow and a straight face. But with repetition, the list becomes peculiarly convincing. One can only hope that the air-brushing of Paul's cigarette by a person or persons unknown ignites afresh all the old conspiracy theories. Since the claims concern a celebrity, it can be only a matter of days before a 12-man police squad bursts into Sir Paul McCartney's home to ask him whether or not he is real. If he hesitates for even one second, he will be bundled off to the nearest police station, where he will be asked to run through the words of "Love Me Do" without hesitation, repetition or deviation. The police must get to the bottom of this great mystery for once and for all. If Sir Paul isn't Sir Paul, then who on earth is he? Tommy Steele? And how many others among our best-loved celebrities are being played by sinister impostors? Soon after the death of HM the Queen Mother, I noticed that "Sir Paul" began to take on her appearance. What does it all mean? Is the impostor making a bid for the Royal status? Alone among columnists, I am often hit by the feeling that I really don't know what to believe any more.

Music: This man isn't the real Mac

2010-12-02T19:33:00.000-08:00

11/7/04 Sunday Mercury 40

2004 WLNR 10485825

Sunday Mercury (Birmingham, UK)

November 7, 2004

Section: Features

Music: This man isn't the real Mac

He's mean, he's outspoken and he's ugly. He's Ugly Phil, the Kerrang! radio host with his rock'n'droll column.

UGLY PHIL

I LOVE a conspiracy theory as much as the next guy.

I knew they'd faked the Moon landing long before the movie Capricorn One came along. The fact that OJ Simpson played one of the astronauts only helped to cement my convictions.

But if you want to tread the path of rock'n'roll conspiracies, well, take a seat. How long have you got?

Type 'music conspiracies' into your internet search engineand you'll find some evidence that'll make you kick yourself for missing the obvious clues in the first place.Paul McCartney's dead for starters. Well, the original one anyway!

He was replaced by a lookalike lefthanded bass-player early on, and the rest of The Beatles were sworn to secrecy.

Spurred no doubt by John Lennon, the now Fab Three tried to spill the beans with enigmatic album covers.

Just look at the cover of Abbey Road. What's the number plate on the Volkswagen in the background?

It's 28, the age Paul would have been had he lived. And Paul's barefoot, of course.

Look at the cover of Sgt Pepper. All those dead celebrities on the cover, andPaulwith a hand raised above his head - in the Egyptian death sign!

And, hey, it explains why his music went from brilliant to bloody awful almost overnight...

Spooky or what? Bottom line here, people. If you're Paul McCartney, then you're living a lie...

Google bomb: "Paul McCartney is Dead"

2010-11-24T18:06:00.000-08:00

Paul McCartney in one of his last interviews -

Memphis, Aug. 19, 1966

Help me get exposure to PID by dropping a Google PID bomb. Alex Jones has been able to successfully exploit Google's search engine to by-pass the controlled media and focus attention on certain issues. One example is the TSA controversy involving naked body scanners and enhanced pat-downs. Jones dropped a Google bomb, drove the issue to the top of the Google search rankings, and made TSA's irradiation and molestation of innocent passengers a huge issue.

Let's drop a PID Google bomb. Simply enter "Paul McCartney is Dead" a bunch of times in Google. Let's see if we can drive PID up in the search rankings and get more people looking into the tragic replacement of Paul McCartney. Maybe one day, there will be justice for Paul. Thanks for caring!

Happy Thanksgiving!

~ Tina Foster

PID Miss Him Forum

"You can't always tell the would be's from the real thing"

2010-10-31T11:42:00.000-07:00

Mind Games: John Lennon vs. his look-alike double

This was posted by Getsmart, a fellow PID researcher and guest contributor, on the ATS forum [link]. It is an analysis of the Beatles August 28,1966 LA press conference. As has been discussed in a previous blog post, Was Paul McCartney replaCIAed in August 1966?, I believe this is the first public appearance of Faul as Paul McCartney. Getsmart posits this may also be the Lennon double.

In my opinion, John Lennon's name and image were hijacked to make "him" an ineffectual "leader" of the anti-war movement. In this way, the powers that be could control their opposition. John ONO Lennon and Yoko Ono gave MontyPython-esque interviews against the Vietnam war that made the peace activists look ridiculous, thus discrediting the whole peace movement. This is very similar to how Jim Morrison (the son of the admiral commanding at the false flag Gulf of Tonkin "attack") was planted as a "leader" of the anti-war movement. It just so happens that December 8 is the date for both Jim Morrison's birthday and Lennon's murder.

~ Tina Foster

PID Miss Him Forum

________________________

John Lennon vs. his look-alike double in the 1967 movie, "How I Won the War."

Here is a video of the August 28th, 1966 Los Angeles press conference in which some particularly interesting questions were asked.

After minute 5:00 John replies to the question:

"What was the song Eleanor Rigby based upon?"

It is important to realize that this is a song which we now know to have been written on the basis of names on tombstones in St Peters Cemetery where both Paul and John used to roam when they first met. Here is a post which clarifies that John must have known exactly what Eleanor Rigby was based upon, but an impostor couldn't possibly fathom what.

Source of The Beatles song Eleanor Rigby

John flippantly replies:

"Two queers."

He then seems to be rather bothered by the ensuring hilarity from the crowd. He goes on to interrupt a journalist to correct himself, looking at Paul for a cue, and then says something difficult to make out any better than "Two battle boys" or "Two babble boys," thanks if you can help in deciphering that phrase.

I think that he was referring insultingly to the REAL PAUL and the REAL JOHN whom they have already replaced as their doubles, adding insult to injury by calling them "a couple of queers."

This smacks of "army talk" and does not in any way correspond to the vernacular used by open-minded sixties rebels. Was it because of that giveaway comment that then tried to correct himself? Did he get a signal from a handler to repair his glaring mistake?

We have therefore been - and probably since this early date of August 28th, 1966 - in the presence of two impostors posing to the press and the public as the real John Lennon and the real Paul McCartney.

We are obviously not the only ones who noticed strange goings on insofar as The Beatles' identities were concerned, and because of this broad concern among many witnesses, the journalist was then brought to pointedly ask another question - note that this was way back in the summer of 1966:

"Have you ever trained or used Beatle Doubles as DECOYS?

John replies meekly "No... No..." and Paul meekly echoes an identical mimicked "No...No..."and then adds:

"We tried to get Brian Epstein to do it, he wouldn't do it."

This may well be revealing of why Brian Epstein was assassinated, unwilling he was to assist the murder and replacement of his band members.

In the same press conference video, at minute 6:38 a journalist asks Paul who does Beatles songs the best. Paul looks about as if 'obviously' The Beatles themselves would do Beatles songs the best, but then looks furtively at an equally silent John and embarrassed, he doesn't reply. Obviously they knew they were totally lame as replacement musicians and unable to "do Beatles songs properly," so they both chose to clam up.

At minute 9:41 FAUL gives us his first in a very long series of false identity confessions, with the following statement:

"We know our Real Image which is nothing like our image."

Upon the crowd's uproar he adds loudly:

"Forget it !"

Apparently we are not to remember what he says when he has an unconscious lapse. He also possibly thought he'd cleared up his unintentional leak by issuing a 'command' such as those used when coaching mind controlled impostors. Smiling at the crowd, he then looked furtively at someone in the public to his front left, at which time his smile suddenly turns to a frown and he says:

"What I meant to say..." followed by silence, hiding his eyes with his hand, not knowing how to get out of his predicament by another statement given that the initiative was not his own but probably commanded by a handler in the audience. John comes to his rescue with another flippant remarks that sounds something like "I like sticks or bricks" although I possibly inaccurately deciphered what John said at minute 10:00.

At minute 12:35 John uses a common impostor 'question avoidance' tactic by replying "No comment" to a simple question about a public statement he had recently made to a journalist and which had been published in the press. Faul, noticing that his response was unsatisfactory and maybe not wanting to be the only one looking like a loser in front of their 'agency impostor handlers' - taunted John saying "Come on, John, tell them what you mean." Thus pressured by his co-conspirator's prompting, John nevertheless was unable to reply to a clear question for any politically structured individual such as John Lennon was purported to be. Here is the question along with John's clueless answer:

QUESTION: "Show Business is an extension of the Jewish religion. Would you mind amplifying that?"

John Lennon:

"I mean, you can read into it what you like. It's just a little old statement. I was not very serious about it."

QUESTION: "And those words, how did you piece them together?"

John Lennon:

"Oh, I don't know..."

Was John Lennon someone who lent himself to making trivial statements about fundamental political matters? Hardly. On this subject, here is what Texe Marrs confirms:

Do The Jews Own Hollywood And The Media?

Let us please remember that this is not the Jewish people nor the Jewish religion, but only a small group of fanatics who have infiltrated several nations among which Israel and the USA and who hide behind judaism to dissimulate their plans which have nothing to do with the welfare of anyone Jewish. They are Zionists, and as our current US Vice-President so eloquently puts it, this has nothing to do with being Jewish.

The Zionists are the Illuminati

We know that the Zionists were behind WWII and are fully enmeshed with the CIA and the Illuminati. As evidence, here is how Zionist Jacob Rothschild designed the Israeli Supreme Court filled with Illuminati symbolism, acting in mockery of the honest and honorable citizens of Israel, a Zionist movement that this video says is ANTISEMETIC.

The Zionists are Illuminati USURPERS of Judaism

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjFDQJranVk [embedding disabled]

John Lennon obviously knew about this, at least insofar as it extended to the music industry and show business at large. He was quoted by the press for such strong opposition and public statements, which explains why John was replaced, and Paul obviously along with him. John and Paul were rebellious enough for their Agency impostors to find it politically correct in those reactionary times to call them "Two queers". Pardon me if I don't share their sense of humor defiling the dignity of two honorable young men who served humanity with their duty to the TRUTH.

At the end of the Los Angeles video, at minute 14:00 John goes so far as to declare right before turning to Paul laughing:

"You can't always tell the would be's from the real thing."

________________________

Let us remember that

The Beatles were a deeply politicized band, something which was obscured by their drift into mindless psychedelic spaced out apolitical passivity from Sgt Pepper onwards. Today they appear as either naive lyric artists when looking at their early days to an apogee of studio musicians and 64 track mixed sound effects to blow out your mind on drugs. The hard edge was entirely LOBOTOMIZED from their music as if their minds had been removed, something which was apparently done by also removing and replacing their bodies with look-alikes.

~ Getsmart

PID on AxXiom Radio - Nov. 12 (updated)

2010-10-25T11:21:00.000-07:00

Just a quick announcement that Tina Foster will be discussing PID, the Beatles, and the 60's on Axxiom Rule of Law Radio on November 12, 2010 from 6:15-7:15 pm CST. A link to the archived show will be posted when available. Stay tuned!

UPDATE:

Tina's interview with Andrew Griffin is now available in the archives.

A4L_2010-11-12_128k.mp3

A4L_2010-11-12_16k.mp3

The PID part starts at 20 minutes in.

The file with just the PID portion can be downloaded here (thank you to our UK friend who posted it).

Join the discussion at Paul is Dead Miss Him Miss Him Miss Him.

On John Lennon's 70th Birthday, troubling questions remain

2010-10-09T12:48:00.000-07:00

Today, October 9, 2010, would have been Beatle John Lennon's 70th birthday. It is a time to celebrate the brilliant musician and author, but it is also a time to remember that there are many unresolved issues surrounding the assassination outside the Dakota Apartments in New York City. Those issues must be addressed if any measure of justice is to be found. The following is a news report from that fateful night - December 8, 1980:

The news report was incorrect that Mark David Chapman was a "local screwball." Chapman was not local at all, but rather flew all the way from Hawaii to be there (making the trip for the second time).

Lennon signing an autograph for Chapman (12/8/80), whose preoccupation

with Lennon had begun just months before the murder.

There were also discrepancies with other reports how many times Lennon had been shot. This report states that Lennon may have been shot as many as seven times and was dead after the first bullet hit him. The official story is that John was hit by four bullets and that he lived long enough to tell the doorman he was shot and nod to the cop who asked him if he were John Lennon. Oftentimes, the earliest reports of an incident are more accurate. This is because information comes out before the journalists can be informed of the official party line. If Lennon had been struck by seven bullets, that may indicate that a second gunman was involved, which contradicts the official version that Chapman acted alone.

Prior to the murder, Chapman mailed a letter to an Italian address, giving the Dakota as a return address. In 1983, head of security, Mahoney, found the letter. There was a reference to Chapman's "mission" in NYC, which constitutes possible evidence of premeditated murder and conspiracy. The letter vanished and reappeared with the post-date changed to 1981. The "mission" statement was also missing. In addition, Lennon's diaries were stolen and returned later with extra entries and some entries altered and many files were found to have missing contents at Yoko's apartment after Lennon was killed. (Fred Seaman, a Lennon staffer and look-alike, was convicted of stealing personal effects from the Lennon estate).

Dr. Stephen Lynn, the physician who attended to Lennon after he had been shot, admitted evidence had been destroyed. He said everything, including Lennon's bloodstained clothes, was destroyed. He also said the medical records were given to an administrator and put in a vault.

It is most troubling that the hospital destroyed evidence in a murder investigation. The medical records, clothes, and other evidence should have been given to investigators, not put in a vault or destroyed. Destroying evidence in a murder investigation is rendering criminal assistance in the first degree in some states.

Because Chapman confessed, what evidence remained was skimmed over in court.

No convincing evidence was presented that Chapman had caused Lennon to turn. Also, this wasn't a trial since Chapman had already confessed. It was simply a sentencing hearing. There was no official testimony or any witnesses. The case was declared closed on the night of the murder, and the police report is lacking in any substantive detail.

[Source: Jerry Mazza, "On the 25th anniversary of John Lennon's assassination, imagine..." Online Journal, Dec 7, 2005]

Lennon's body was cremated the next day, despite Lennon's "horror of cremation" (according to biographer Albert Goldman). Obviously, this made it impossible to later exhume the body to search for evidence. There are some problems with the theories we have been told about how the shooting went down that an examination may have been able to resolve.

Imagine the theory we've been told: that Lennon had walked past Chapman, who was to the right and then rear of him in the dark entryway. If Chapman had called out, "Mr. Lennon," and John stopped and turned, it was possible though difficult for him to hit Lennon in the left shoulder, and then as Lennon turned to flee, to hit him in the upper left back. Yet Chapman told Judge Dennis Edwards at a sentencing hearing that he didn't say anything to Lennon, just that he fired.
Imagine a second theory: Perdomo or another operative fired from the doorway leading to the service elevator, which was at the left of the walkway and in front of Lennon. There are two series of two shots. First, two shots hit the left shoulder. As Lennon runs towards the lobby stairway, two other shots hit his upper left back. Shooting from that doorway seems a more plausible way to make those hits. Since the autopsy was not made public, we don't know if three of the five shots exited, grazed or missed Lennon to hit the glass lobby door.

[Source: Jerry Mazza, "On the 25th anniversary of John Lennon's assassination, imagine..." Online Journal, Dec 7, 2005]

Chapman had an interesting background that suggests CIA ties. At 19 (1975), he signed onto the YMCA international camp counselor program and was sent to Beirut where he allegedly received instructions in lethal arts at the CIA training camp. He also worked in Laos at a camp with CIA connections.

Mark White in his political comic strip, Dead Silence in the Brain, reports that as a young man Mark Chapman began working at a Laotian refugee camp. The camp was run by World Vision, an evangelical charity which runs refugee camps worldwide. It has assisted in numerous CIA operations. Its camps along the Honduran border, for instance, were used to recruit the death squads of El Salvador . . . Researcher John Judge writes, "World Vision appears to be an elaborate cover for the recruitment, training and placement of assassins worldwide."

[Source: Jerry Mazza, "On the 25th anniversary of John Lennon's assassination, imagine..." Online Journal, Dec 7, 2005]

After he shot Lennon, Chapman sat and waited for the police, reading the book, The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger (which just happens to be about phonies). John Hinckley, Jr., Reagan's would-be assassin, was also carrying a copy of this book. Salinger, apparently, had extensive ties to the CIA. The doorman at the Dakota that night was a CIA trained assassin who had been involved in the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961.

According to Cuban Information Archives and Salvador Austucia, author of Rethinking John Lennon's Assassination, Perdomo was also known as "Joaquin Sanjenis," and "Sam Jenis." He was mostly known as an anti-Castro Cuban exile and a member of Brigade 2506 during the Bay of Pigs Invasion in 1961, a miserably failed CIA operation, which cost Company Head Allan Dulles his job, and maybe John F. Kennedy his life, also by a mythic lone gunman, who turned out to play patsy, too...

Imagine Perdomo had reason to insist Mark was the man. Perdomo, aka Sanjenis, had worked side by side, ah yes, with convicted and now deceased Watergate burglar Frank Sturgis for about a decade on the CIA payroll...

[T]he doorman on duty, one Jose Perdomo, supposedly screamed "Leave! Get out of here!" Then he asked Chapman, "Do you know what you've done?" "I just shot John Lennon," Chapman said matter-of-factly. Then we're told, Chapman threw down his gun, took off his coat, folded it at his feet, and calmly started reading a paperback, Catcher in the Rye. Perdomo kicked the gun away. One wonders why Perdomo told him to leave, after reminding him of his crime. Perhaps Perdomo was the shooter and planted the gun.

[Source: Jerry Mazza, "On the 25th anniversary of John Lennon's assassination, imagine..." Online Journal, Dec 7, 2005]

Fenton Bresler concludes in his book, The Murder of John Lennon, that the CIA killed Lennonusing Chapman as a mind-controlled assassin. According to Alex Constantine, Chapman testified "I can hear their thoughts, I can hear them talking, but not from the outside, from the inside." This sounds like mind-control technology.

Imagine author Salvador Astucia's somewhat offbeat scenario: "As Lennon passes Chapman, a member of the FBI's assassination squad somehow transmits an audible message to Chapman . . . which places him in a semi-hypnotic trance . . ." Perhaps Jose Perdomo simply whispered in his ear something that had been programmed into Chapman's psyche earlier: "Kill Lennon."

...

So I don't think Chapman was picked from a hat from the general population. I think he had had intense behavioral conditioning for the Lennon assassination, though I don't think he was the triggerman. I believe he was too much of a risk as a Manchurian Candidate, even at close range. So Perdomo & Associates lent a helping hand.

[Source: Jerry Mazza, "On the 25th anniversary of John Lennon's assassination, imagine..." Online Journal, Dec 7, 2005]

Bresler believed Lennon was publicly executed because the new Reagan administration was worried about his becoming politically active and being able to unite the people to create positive change. Lennon "was more influential than any head of state in the world." RCA (headed by "General" David Sarnoff)

was EMI's silent partner, and also active in military and space electronics and satellite communications. It was subsequently acquired by General Electric... It was a classic example of what President Dwight Eisenhower would have called the "military industrial complex," producing even the rebellious Beatles for a buck, so long as the boys kept their place.

[Source: Jerry Mazza, "On the 25th anniversary of John Lennon's assassination, imagine..." Online Journal, Dec 7, 2005] EMI (Electrical and Musical Industries) was "also a military contractor to the British War Office. So a high-ranking American official could make a call to a high-ranking British official and complain about this Lennon fellow ramping up American youth against government policy." [Id.]

But apart from any possible future threat Lennon may or may not have posed to the Reagan regime, Lennon did reveal in a 1980 Playboy interview how the government used LSD to control people. From "Harrison Stabbing & Masonic Symbolism" by NewsHawk:

Lennon was murdered shortly after he gave an interview to Playboy magazine in which he blew the lid off the fact that the Beatles were part of massive experimentation in social control/engineering unleashed by Tavistock and intelligence agencies, as was the deliberate introduction of drugs like LSD into the burgeoning "counterculture" scene during the 1960s and 1970s.

From the 1980 Playboy interview:

LENNON: ... We must always remember to thank the CIA and the Army for LSD. That's what people forget. Everything is the opposite of what it is, isn't it, Harry? So get out the bottle, boy... and relax. They invented LSD to control people and what they did was give us freedom. Sometimes it works in mysterious ways its wonders to perform. If you look in the Government reports on acid, the ones who jumped out the window or killed themselves because of it, I think even with Art Linkletter's daughter, it happened to her years later. So, let's face it, she wasn't really on acid when she jumped out the window...

Was the release of this information what prompted the assassination?

Another issue that the interview raises is that Dr. Lynn was Lennon's neighbor and saw him regularly but did not know who it was until he opened the wallet. The nurse at the hospital said it did not look anything like John Lennon, and even laughed at the suggestion. There was no suggestion that Lennon's face had been injured, so why was he so hard to recognize? In the article, I don't believe in Featles: CIAlebrity impersonator, "John Lennon", I suggested that Lennon had actually been replaced, and the person who was assassinated (or mock assassinated) was an impostor. Recently, a set of Lennon's fingerprints was seized by the FBI in New York (on October 6, 2010).

"Peter Siegel, co-founder of GOTTA HAVE IT!, the shop selling the fingerprint card, said he was bewildered by the FBI action and interest during the week also by Homeland Security." Siegel said, "This great icon has been deceased for 30 years... This is not a national threat." [Source: FBI seizes John Lennon’s fingerprints in N.Y.] However, if Lennon had been replaced, it would make sense that "they" would not want sets of fingerprints floating around that could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that John, too, had been the victim of impostor-replacement.

The corpse of Faux Lennon:

Note the longer, pointier nose and smaller chin

There are some interesting clues pointing to Lennon's death that appear years before. These clues suggest that John's death had been planned ahead - or had already occurred.

The "Magical Mystery Tour" album was released on December 8, 1967. There is a sign in the movie of the same name that says "The best way to go is by M&DC." 13 years to the day after the release of this album, a man with the initials M.D.C. was presented as his assassin.

The sign above the M&DC reference reads: "Extra (or Exit?) Brighton" It just so happens that Brighton is the final resting place of Aleister Crowley (British Secret Service agent and Satanist).
[Source: Allen J. Ottens, Rick Myer, Satanism: Rumor, Reality, and Controversy, at p. 20]

An actor named Mark Lindsay Chapman was cast to play John Lennon in a 2007 movie called "Chapter 27."

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0152464/
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0488988/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0152464/resume

The location of the Lennon assassination was at the Dakota building. It became a national historic landmark on December 8, 1976. [source] Lennon (or his double) was killed exactly four years later.

The Dakota was where the movie, "Rosemary's Baby," was filmed in 1968. The movie was about Satanism and murder. In 1977, Chapman became a Satanist.

[The] Dakota Apartments had been portrayed by filmmaker Roman Polanski in the 1960s as a den of Satanic cult activity (in his film Rosemary’s Baby). Not long before Lennon’s murder, Chapman had approached occult filmmaker Kenneth Anger and offered him a gift of live bullets. Just days after Lennon was felled, Anger’s long-delayed final cut of Lucifer Rising made its New York debut, not far from the bloodstained grounds of the Dakota Apartments...

[Source: Dave McGowan, Inside The LC: The Strange but Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation, Part IX]

The Dakota apartment being linked to Satanism could be a clue that intelligence agencies were involved, since they use Satanism as a cover for their activities:

... One of the points that we've tried to make, throughout the course of our discussion of *The Ultimate Evil*, is that, again, the *Satanism* is one of the things that throws people off. The intelligence agencies have *long* used occult groups as a front for activity. For one thing, occult groups exist at the periphery of public scrutiny and therefore are ideal to use as intelligence fronts. In addition to that, because of the unusual activities of occult groups, any suspicious activity on the part of an intelligence agent *using* these groups could be laid simply to the bizarre nature of the group itself. [CN -- also, first amendment protections for "religious" freedom would help shield them from investigation.] Now specifically, vis a vis mind control, many, many of the cults on the scene today are, in fact, mind-control fronts for the U.S. Intelligence and Military communities.

[Source: SON OF UNCLE SAM: A Lecture by David Emory]

The mind-controlled patsy, the CIA doorman, and the cover-up seem to suggest the hit on Lennon was carried out as an intelligence operation.

~ Tina Foster

Join the discussion: PID Miss Him forum

Sir Paul and the Serpent Cult: Rock n' Roll and Nazi Mind Control

2010-10-02T11:15:00.000-07:00

Fellow PID researcher and guest contributor to this blog, Getsmart, posted the following analysis at PID - Motivations for the Murder of Paul McCartney.

Getsmart discusses how music and musicians have been used to engineer social change, pointing to how military espionage has intervened in western society's cultural affairs [see The Beats and Government Intelligence: What Were the Sixties?]. Getsmart posits that, in the early days, talented musicians were used, which led to some problems due to true artists' naturally independent and rebellious spirit. Their opposition to the System and NWO agenda (especially the promotion of the psycho-chemical warfare agent, LSD, in Paul McCartney's case) forced the Controllers to replace the talented musicians with untalented puppets that they could easily use to manipulate the masses.

Getsmart's thoughtful observations have been lightly edited for content.

~ Tina Foster

Join the discussion: PID Miss Him Forum

------------------------------------------------------------------

"Beyond simply discovering and revealing who killed Paul and

why he was impostor replaced, this research may

also serve an additional purpose of examining the

process of cultural control using Cult Icons and creative

impetus to deceive the public into buying a hidden agenda."

~ Getsmart

The Illuminati Serpent Cults have used music since ancient times to entrance populations often associating it with rituals and occult symbolism. Maybe Wagner's operatic works can also be associated with this as espoused by Hitler, and in modern times the trance inducing effects first of rock music and later more openly so Rave parties.

Revealing of this process is the title of [Theodor] Adorno's work:

The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception

This highlights the probable use of The Beatles and the worldwide lasting propagation of their music and lyrics within such a process of Illuminati Mind Control. Whether for human dominance or to further an Alien Agenda must be sorted out for each investigator based upon their acquired body of knowledge and suppositions about the underlying intent...

The Beats [see The Beats and Government Intelligence: What Were the Sixties?] preceeded The Beatles by approximately ten years, a time differential which might have been useful to hone infiltration and hypnotic suggestion techniques through music as well as to step up to a global reach of said programs through an internationally promoted boy's band - namely The Beatles.

What is also interesting is this articles' association of the Anglo-American Military Strategy of conquest of Indigenous peoples using drugs or alcohol to destroy the cultural fabric of their society. The British did this in China by importing Opium during the late 18th and early 19th century, leading to the Boxer wars, and the Americans similarly destroyed Native American culture and societal strengths by dowsing their communites with Fire Water in the form of distilled alcohols which were incompatible wtih their genetic predispositions. The sixties drug culture did little less than extend such measures of military pre-emptive strikes against potential future counterinsurgency movements to the entire world population, undermining pretty much any traditional culture anchored in any society with a blanket rejection by the younger generations.

This article and the process described should help illustrate how seemingly neutral and innocuous cultural manifestations through popular music may have become one of the leading arenas of combat for a Military Counter Intelligence Program (Cointelpro) explaining the numerous unsolved DEATHS and the occasional REPLACEMENTS of various Rock Music Artists. It also cast light on the possible motivations to cover up these crimes and conceal from public view the vast program of cultural manipulation through HOLLYWOOD, NASHVILLE and the ROCK MUSIC establishments.

Paul was a creative person who wrote, as did John. Anyone who has ever written knows that much of your production winds up in notebooks, on loose papers, and in modern times in multitudes of document types or forum threads or chat boards. Production is part of writing, and from it is derived a logical pursuit as well as a creative mode which is distinctive and personal. This makes one person's book akin to their soul, and another's song akin to their heart. For this reason it is my premise that The Illuminati purposely let The Beatles express themselves as freely as possible to establish their own style and set forth their trademark personality which is inimitable yet is so imitated that parodies and emulators cannot be counted.

James Paul McCartney was possibly even promoted to fame in view of later instrumentalizing him and the other Beatles in view of eliciting their collaboration and complicity by way of temptation and/or threat. My take on this was that Paul refused to betray his fans and would not turn his back on humanity to further that dark agenda. This explains his Assassination and Replacement by the Imposter FAUL. The latter, a Cointelpro Agent, went on to engage the devastating promotion of the narcohypnotic drug LSD - planned as a Military Assault on all of humanity using Nazi Mind Control techniques.

Let us remember that this was a time when The Illuminati were still trying to harness TALENT to use for their own nefarious purposes. Yet during the fifties and sixties this program ran into numerous difficulties in co-opting complicities and deviating artistic purpose, leading to the deaths of countless artists of the period in choreographed suicides, provoked accidents, alleged overdoses, etc. Then there were those who were considered too usefully positioned in the public mind or too visibly murdered to be allowed to disappear and who were thus REPLACED by doubles, imitators, impostors, look-alike agents. For them stories such as traumas, recovery from accidents, plastic surgery or spiritual rebirth after a retreat were used as a cover for any notable differences people would voice concern over. These were possibly the bloodiest of the program interventions requiring cleanup operations where those closest and presenting the greatest risks of exposure were in turn dealt with and in turn replaced.

Today it appears that this unwieldy program was deemed to costly in organization and resources, as well as requiring overly difficult mind control over subjects who are most likely to resist, artists with rebellious souls and independent minds. So today's Cointelpro waged against humanity is operated not with talented artists but rather with people of little talent, those who without the program's assistance would never rise on their own merits to fame and fortune, making them entirely dependent upon their masters and themselves guilty of deceit by virtue of being impostors of a talented artist whereas the music and lyrics they are claimed to write are provided by ghostwriters from the industry controllers' workshops. Paul's death and replacement is therefore one of the reasons that today they have reverted to using singers without voices, poets without poetry, actors without charisma and musicians without brio. Living an undeserved success story and being totally dependent, they are more likely to comply. And if they don't the are far easier to replace given that there is no talent to imitate, as the only creative inputs come from a machine which would survive their physical death. This is why it is maybe harder to detect or notice the replacement of more contemporary stars, actors, singers and pseudo-artists.

Paul was murdered ... and we would do well to further pursue who did the killing, and who put Faul into his shoes. Faul should be confronted with this publicly by those in his entourage, because he knows and owes the world the truth. The Cointelpro Agent FAUL, also known as Bill, alias xxx, must be cornered into confession before they eliminate him just as they did John Lennon's Imposter at the Dakota Building.

Guest commentary by Getsmart

Crackdown on PID Truth at Icke forum (updated)

2010-08-08T09:34:00.000-07:00

As discussed in previous posts, PIAgents cannot tolerate discussion of PID because it threatens to expose a much larger replacement agenda using lookalike doubles. Therefore, they strategize ways to silence PID Truthers.

I just posted about Getsmart yesterday, and today, wakeuptime, another PID Truther on the Icke forum emailed me to inform me that she had been sanctioned for "discussing moderation" (God forbid! The horror!). This person's post about how the PIAgent provocateurs at "Macca Funhouse" coordinated an attack on the Paul is dead thread was deleted and they were "penalized."

Here is the text that was deleted:

Quote:

Originally Posted by ar20

I've been through other topics on the forum as well with a lot worse disagreements, cursing and a whole host of other bad behavior and it's never been brought to a close.

There definately is something strange going on here. Why are people so concerned about this discussion in particular?

Excellent post, Ar, and this is the key question. Why are people so keen to shut down this discussion? I've never even been a Beatles fan but I see something major is going on here. Otherwise there wouldn't be such a concerted effort to shut down the truth.

Quote:

There hasn't been any real debunking. Only insults, , and nitpicking at minor points which bog down the posters. I personally have trouble contending with these people as they don't actually debate... they CONSTANTLY IGNORE POINTS I MAKE then go off on one about something unrelated.

Precisely. That same group shows up --- especially when PID's evidence has been effectively proving that Paul is dead --- and insults, throws in pointless comments, avoid addressing evidence. They simply derail. These are the ones I call shills because they are. Nimoy, who posted some of my posts calling these troublemaker shills, is one of the worst offenders.

Quote:

Look this information isn't going away. I don't see why this topic should be locked in particular, if the mods did their job and actually READ what was going on it would be clear who the culprits are.

Another great point. Take a look at who's causing trouble and if you want to keep this "calm" you crave, ban the posters who show up only to insult and cause trouble. Problem solved.

Quote:

They have to ask themselves if it's really that dumb a theory... then why is their concerted effort to derail the topic and shut us up?

This is what I was thinking all day yesterday after seeing yet another threat to close the thread.

What I felt in my gut is justice is being blocked and I don't like one bit the way that feels especially here on Icke's forum. Truth is what he stands for, for goodness sake!

Quote:

I also hate being told that I have to tone MY behavior down in a topic. I haven't done anything wrong to warrant closure of the thread. It's a sweeping generalisation by the moderators puting us in the mix with the crap that's posted.

Spot on again. LOOK at who the provocateurs are. Its clear.

Quote:

Calling someone a shill (when they clearly are if they'd look at the topic) isn't a bannable/lockable offence in my book. Notoriously decieving debating tactics are. Until that's cleared up, this topic has no chance.

Right. We get condemned for calling certain posters shills, those who spend their entire lives on PID threads mocking and insulting. Are we really the guilty ones?

Quote:

It's also a lot better when the banned stay banned and are unable to register new accounts to post solely in this topic.

Why are the repeat offenders allowed to sign up again and continue with their same old antics? In America they release repeat offenders to create havoc in society. Is it the same on this thread?

Quote:

But hey, I don't have the power... what do I know?

Right. We don't make the final decision. We're just trying to investigate what the truth is. Must be nice to have the power to decide.

Quote:

Originally Posted by merlincove

The forum IS a place for personal freedom of expression and free speech, although when that freedom of expression is applied to insult and attack other forum members then moderation is required in accordance with the forum guidelines:

The question then has to be why someone like Sea of Green who openly threatened Hermajesty wasn't banned? And why Nimoy who is clearly Lightman reborn is allowed to re-register and continue his abuse?

Quote:

Members need to remember that other members are here to discuss without the fear of being insulted, threatened or labelled for doing so.

Agreed. But it has to apply to everyone, not the chosen few.

I realize I have no ultimate power in this discussion because the thread's closure will be discussed elsewhere by those with that power.

I will say that this thread's content is important enough that the thread should not be closed.

Truth is important.

Here is the text of the warning she received from Merlincove(n) one of the Icke mods:

---------------------------

Dear wakeuptime,

You have received an infraction at David Icke's Official Forums.

Reason: Discussing Moderation on the Forum - First Notice
-------
wakeuptime

after repeated requests from moderation that members do not post insults toward off topic derailment, you choose to attend to posting insinuations about forum members and discussing moderation with a view toward bias.

the forum guidelines ask that members post queries on moderation to the moderation team by PM and not discuss such on the forum and yet you choose to discuss moderation decisions which have been made after careful consideration, banning members and allude to supposed threats.

There is no evidence to support your claim that banned members are posting under new user names and your insinuation to such is missleading [sic]. Where threats have been made, moderation has intervened.

Please stay on topic as has been requested.

Thanks
-------

This infraction is worth 3 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1059127301#post1059127301

---------------------------

We actually do have evidence that PIAgent provocateurs who were banned on Icke have signed up with new usernames. For example, Light_man was banned for a serious violation of the forum rules, but he is back posting as nimoyl. The mods are either easily tricked with an IP scrambler or simply allow Agents to sign back up. They were obviously very sorry to see Light_man go. After he was banned, I posted about how he had admitted to doctoring photos of Paul and Faul. Poor Light_man wasn't there to defend himself, so I got a warning from Merlincove.

As has been noted before, the Icke moderation team has been thoroughly infested by Agents who have maneuvered themselves into a moderator position so that they can control the information. They harshly punish someone with a "bias," while allowing PIAgents to repeatedly insult and even threaten PID Truthers - they have even coordinated their own attacks against PID Truth.

The mods have closed down discussion of PID in the past, and are now threatening to close the 3rd PID thread, which is very active (it gets close to 1,000 views a day). I am not sure why they allow discussion of PID in the first place, being the domino issue that it is, but it seems to me that they are fine with it as long as people think it is a "hoax." Merlincove recently posted a poll asking people to vote on whether Paul was dead or alive. He shut it down after only 17 votes (before I could even vote). Why? Probably because the votes for PID were outnumbering the votes for PIA. If the purpose of the poll was to show a consensus for PIA, then it back-fired. When it showed more people believed PID, the poll was quickly yanked.

Once people start seeing that Paul McCartney really was replaced, then they have to try to shut down discussion of what happened to Paul and why before the sheeple wake up and remove the wool from their eyes.

~ Tina Foster

Join the discussion: Paul is Dead Miss Him forum

See related posts:

PIAgents at Macca Funhouse

Disinfo & MIoPIA: PI-Agent Seaofgreen

Truth suppression, Disinformation, & MIoPIA: PI-Agent, Templer06

Faul in Line: MIoPIA at David MI-cke Forum (updated)

PIA Disinfo Agent Extraordinaire: Light_man/Dakudo

Truth Suppression and Disinformation

Faul in Line: PID, Truth Suppression, & Info Wars in Cyberspace

UPDATE: Technical Advisor, I_Am, has now closed the PID thread at Icke (8/9/10). Here is her post:

I am now closing this thread for a few months.

Everyone is going around in circles, insulting each other and generally, all need to take a step back.

Please do not start new threads or hijack other existing threads about celebs with continuance of this subject. Maybe some of you might even get involved in other topics on this forum. Maybe not!

When this is reopened, hopefully we will see a more relaxed attitude and perhaps rational discussion can take place...

Link

Obviously, PID is a topic that cannot be allowed to be discussed by the agents who have infiltrated and hijacked the David Icke Forum.

UPDATE 2: I_Am is now back-pedaling and offering to sticky the Icke PID thread if I remove the link to this blog in my signature. I think they are uncomfortable with their actions to suppress the Truth about Paul McCartney being exposed to public scrutiny.

UPDATE 3: I_Am has now withdrawn the offer to sticky the PID thread and complains of "ridiculous accusations" made on this blog. All of the "accusations" made have been based on how the Icke mods have behaved and have been documented, such an unfairly punishing PID Truthers while allowing PIAgents to harass and threaten PID Truthers. If nothing else, the mods have rewarded PIA bad behavior by doing exactly what they wanted - close down discussion of PID.

Update 4: Getsmart suffered harsh reprisals from the Icke forum administration after posting about infiltration and hijacking of the Icke forum.

ORIGINAL TEXT OF DELETED POST BY GETSMART:

David Icke forum staffer "i_am" has in the past shown the possibility that she at least appears to be an MI5 or MI6 infiltrated agent in position at the top of the Icke internet establishment.

MI-5/6 operatives in the David Icke forum may have infiltrated the administration and moderation of those discussion boards. From that vantage points they, or their colleagues, may post under various identities.

This is a way of manipulating information "in-house" by running the venue where the discussion takes place, much like Facebook was designed and launched by the CIA to directly monitor "in-house" the friendships and intimate conversations of much of the population, but more powerfully, to have instant cross referencing access to personal friendship networks worldwide.

This is not a recent tactic, as inns and meeting halls where political meetings were held have historically been owned and managed by shills working for the established power networks in place at that time. What better source for spying than by running the very network of protests or by taking charge of the popular infrastructures by offering the premises or the logistics attending to their needs? US Aid was similarly infested by CIA agents, explaining why they have many times been targeted when pretending to dispense aid and care to victim populations.

Here is an example of the reprisal for such action, let us hope similar ends are not met by the less exposed Internet Shills doing the same sort of work in the David Icke forums and in discussion groups elsewhere:

CBS New August 8, 2010 report on U.S. Aid Workers Killed in Afghanistan

Allison, David Icke forum's "technical advisor" i_am - whatever that job title means - is the one who acted to "temporarily?" close the PID thread in that forum on what most in the PID movement feel were illegitimate grounds.

i_am's profile at the David Icke forums

Maybe PID is politically incorrect in Alice Spings where she may be cultivating contacts in the local Aborigine community? I only hope for her that her actions there in person are less controversial and more sincere than those committed virtually in the David Icke forums, where her censorship has shown a proven partiality towards preventing Truth from having a voice.