tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post5355224993663840141..comments2023-04-29T06:15:20.104-07:00Comments on Plastic Macca ~ Paul is Dead: Breaking Down Plastic Macca : An Interview with Tina FosterPlastic Maccahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00357968706389614821noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-79240978405217988322018-01-18T10:49:53.530-08:002018-01-18T10:49:53.530-08:00Tina, I have research on many George photos and ca...Tina, I have research on many George photos and can not find the similar differenсes in appearance as with Faul and Paul. Specialy ears looks natural and the same for both. And also what do you think about music of George which seems such original? Of course, with Faul I have no doubs, but with John and George and specialy with their music is not so clear for me. And it is difficult to imagine that the voice of John Lennon also was a counterfeit. And how we can explain all that hints of John and George about PID? So many questions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-45975212293303042842017-01-24T19:21:46.288-08:002017-01-24T19:21:46.288-08:00Is it just me, or does it seem odd that there was ...Is it just me, or does it seem odd that there was the album, "Help!", then "Rubber Soul", then "Revolver"--with all the titles seemingly linked to what seemed to be going on in their lives, with that Tavistock institute's occult-linked skullduggery going on behind the scenes. It suddenly hit me a few days ago, that the titles really may have been 'saying something' to us all that they couldn't come right out and tell everyone due to the danger they were actually in. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03220042226781569669noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-38838653417670301182016-12-13T22:23:21.381-08:002016-12-13T22:23:21.381-08:00Actually, the early Beatles music according to som...Actually, the early Beatles music according to some music theorists/teachers was extraordinary (see Listen Up: Music of the Beatles by Devlyn Case and another one I don't remember the name of (who also does an analysis of Cole Porter), both on You Tube), contrary to the 1st comment. But, of course, there were many others who were just as extraordinary, such as the Beach Boys, the Fabulous 4 Seasons, Spanky n Our Gang, the Shadows, Elvis, the Big Bands, and easy listening orchestras and choruses, which have jazz/swing/Big Band roots. UFO Buffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12542340078671681981noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-84363795270584513992016-11-30T21:13:42.190-08:002016-11-30T21:13:42.190-08:00Probably any classical music - Western or Eastern ...Probably any classical music - Western or Eastern - would be good. I think the Beatles were wonderful, except for the social engineering stuff of the post-Paul Beatles (after Revolver. Maybe when you listen to music, movies, etc, see if you can detect an agenda... could be a fun exercise. lol Plastic Maccahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00357968706389614821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-59197269066896468542016-11-30T19:00:28.617-08:002016-11-30T19:00:28.617-08:00Thank you. I was just curious about your thoughts ...Thank you. I was just curious about your thoughts on this album.<br /><br />Also do you believe there are some artists out there that are safe to listen to, read, watch, etc?<br /><br />I've been reading this site for awhile, and I love the arts, but now I'm a little paranoid about it.<br /><br />For myself, musically, I love Nirvana, The Byrds, Amy Winehouse, The Animals, etc., and listen to alot of music and try to find the best (most pure?) of these things. Do you have any recommendations for doing this? Because I want to be careful, but I don't want to take music, movies, books, etc. out of my life.<br /><br />The comment about The Beatles music theory is very interesting. And I agree with you that you're definitely onto something. Their early music definitely sounds like nothing else I've ever heard before. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-46882622801974702602016-11-29T22:46:37.915-08:002016-11-29T22:46:37.915-08:00I agree that Revolver was the last Beatles' al...I agree that Revolver was the last Beatles' album. In my opinion, it was the best.Plastic Maccahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00357968706389614821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-13754825722854092912016-11-29T18:45:41.599-08:002016-11-29T18:45:41.599-08:00I find it interesting that the interviewer listens...I find it interesting that the interviewer listens up to REVOLVER. REVOLVER for me is the last album I listen to before stopping short at SGT PEPPER and the later albums. For me, this album still had The Beatles spirit with "She Said She Said," "And Your Bird Can Sing," "Got To Get You Into My Life," etc., and still has their vibrant energy. <br /><br />But, again, to each their own. I believe REVOLVER was recorded with the original four members. And it is one of my personal favorite of theirs. <br /><br />I still count it as early Beatles before the changes came in.<br /><br />I'm curious, Tina, where do you ultimately fall with REVOLVER?<br /><br />(A HARD DAY'S NIGHT is my favorite album. But I believe RUBBER SOUL and REVOLVER were their peak albums.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-58844847107463861772016-08-22T09:20:42.407-07:002016-08-22T09:20:42.407-07:00I have had that thought also. What if original Pa...I have had that thought also. What if original Paul wanted a quieter life? I swear I hear both Paul and Faul on Sgt Pepper Album. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-13319269181622881642016-07-01T14:46:21.791-07:002016-07-01T14:46:21.791-07:00Yes, but still co-written by Paul/Faul.Yes, but still co-written by Paul/Faul.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-63981226481463247712016-06-14T16:55:38.444-07:002016-06-14T16:55:38.444-07:00They killed Henry McCullough.They killed Henry McCullough.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-81478977503971254912016-06-13T17:57:55.500-07:002016-06-13T17:57:55.500-07:00"Mull of Kin-Tyre " was written By Denny..."Mull of Kin-Tyre " was written By Denny Lane of The Moody Blues in 1966. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-52445946169163125432016-06-11T16:50:27.713-07:002016-06-11T16:50:27.713-07:00Wouldn't it be an easier explanation if the re...Wouldn't it be an easier explanation if the real Paul just decided in '66 to retire and someone took his place with the full consent of all the band members? This would explain why everyone fell into line - including family members - with the hoax. Maybe the real Paul helped Faul out for awhile with some tracks until he found his feet. No point criticising Faul too much anyway as he has been responsible for some great music. 'Mull of Killtyre?'..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-28098097035326999512016-06-08T05:17:49.670-07:002016-06-08T05:17:49.670-07:00Interesting.
Good to see Tina re-engaging
in th...Interesting. <br /><br />Good to see Tina re-engaging <br />in the fray while the troll <br />Clare Kuehn spends her time <br />talking to her many alias trolls on YouTube and on her assorted and unreadable gibberish oriented blogspots.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00406775014608516353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-63596975817793484762016-06-08T04:07:07.535-07:002016-06-08T04:07:07.535-07:00I meant to say Paul not Faul sang at the beginning...I meant to say Paul not Faul sang at the beginning of "Golden Slumbers." Of course, by now, Sir Paul has overdubbed his vocals. So who is Sir Paul? Phil Ackryll? Wee Willie Campbell? I don't know who he is, but I know who he aint! And he aint no Paul McCartney! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-90846376678568306822016-06-06T18:24:59.963-07:002016-06-06T18:24:59.963-07:00The "new" Beatles outed themselves (or w...The "new" Beatles outed themselves (or were outed) in their animated feature film of Yellow Submarine. On the surface of course its the tale of Parallel Universes/realities which in itself is fascinating. (Sadly they show Paul's metaphorical tombstone.)<br />It also blatantly exposes the bigger picture including the effects of dissonance/dissonant music on consciousness, the viral spread of the internet and its influence on ppl, the NWO-jesuit-"jew"-agenda, the hijacking of love, the dominance of Apple-driven computer products, the use of pseudo-science as a tool of mind-control, the watery world above the firmament of our contained world... <br /><br />and so much more!--not least of all the replacement of our beloved Beatles--if one cares to read between the holes. <br /><br />on a side note: if the only replacement evidence I'd been presented with was Faul's infamous "LSD interview", it'd be enough for my eyes and sensibilities to know the truth. <br /><br />"Living is easy with eyes closed, misunderstanding all you see..."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-55812478105517087522016-06-05T06:43:12.163-07:002016-06-05T06:43:12.163-07:00So, either the music went from more complex to sim...So, either the music went from more complex to simple or more basic to complicated. The last Beatles album would be Revolver, which DavyJones of the Monkees preferred over Pepper. Rock journalist Lester Bangs wrote a cover piece for Creem magazine in the '70's explaining why they hated the Beatles. He even said The Rolling Stones' Flower (1967), was better than Sgt. Pepper. You would need original artifacts like albums, photos and magazine to compare the differences in the newer reproduced images and recently remastered recordings. Not so surprisingly, that has become increasingly more difficult in recent years. With a crashed economy and a WiFi surveillance state, people have thrown out or sold much of their stuff. Try finding a YouTube of original vinyl Beatles recordings. It is much easier with other artists. Beatles or Featles at the LA press conference, admitted witch, David Crosby (Van Cortland) served as their handler/stalker/fan/friend. Faul's debut vocals were on the "Lady Madonna" and "Hey Jude" singles and the White Album. The voice imitators (who looked like George Martin) handled the 1967 releases. However, it is Paul's voice singing "very strange" on "Penny Lane" and "sing it again" on "Your Mother Should Know." Faul sings the first two verses on Abbey Road's "Golden Slumbers." The man who did voice prints in 1969 discovered no discrepancies between John's, George's and Ringo's with that of their replacements other than "With a Little Help from My Friends," which was sung by the same voice imitator who sang on the 1967 songs. Faul did not even play bass on Pepper, it was a woman. Denny Laine said the genius of Faul was in his simple guitar playing, like that on "Blackbird." Faul was a piano player and so was Paul. On the "Wings Over America" album, Faul does not stick with bass, and plays acoustic guitar and piano as well. He sounds nothing like Paul as he attempts to sing "I've Just Seen a Face." You would think that all of the screaming fans of The Beatles would have known that Faul was not Paul And that Fennon was not Lennon and that the others were not George and Ringo either. Perhaps The Beatles were replaced with the entire Swingin' Blue Jeans. They must have been groomed to be their shadow band from the time Tavistock declared a second British invasion on the United States of America, if not the third (World War I.) The Beatles were blue collar rebels. Then Brian Epstein came along. Then Tavistock got involved. Then The Beatles started defying authority at the Royal Command Performance, speaking out against the Vietnam War, growing their hair longer, Lennon's "Jesus" statement and the original Yesterday and Today album cover. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3838291459749552361.post-6933264900151139532016-06-04T15:01:52.508-07:002016-06-04T15:01:52.508-07:00Nice Q and A. Good answers as well as good questio...Nice Q and A. Good answers as well as good questions. I would have a hard time thinking George and Ringo were replaced since their early photos and personalities seem to match their latter years'. Also, although I heartily agree that Paul was a conduit for (en)light(ened) music, the rather dramatic shift in musical style as represented by Sgt. Pepper's album could be explained away if a new musical influence came into the group--that is, Faul. From a music theory perspective, pre-'66 music was heavily influenced by blues and rather simple chord progressions that are rather conventional throughout the-then music world. In other words: Nothing extraordinary. The Sgt. Pepper's compositions introduce quite a different musical theoretical approach: more departure from the traditional blues, more complex, innovative chord progressions, and an entirely psychedelic and melancholic context that is a radical departure from Beatles' earlier music. My impression is that the introduction of a Faul could not have been able to have the influence to have made that radical change because his solo work did not reflect that type of genius. Whether or not it was Faul or other unknown/unnamed musical artists who are responsible for that radical change maybe we may never know, but from a musical theory perspective: 1) From 1966 onward their music takes a dramatic shift in music complexity from more simple to more complex; 2) an argument can be made that it was not the same musicians writing the music, at least in part, which would also support the idea that Paul was replaced (although there may be little argument about that, at this point).Jim Anoreply@blogger.com