Rock Gods: Were the Beatles Angels?

Today, June 18, 2011, would have been Paul McCartney's 69th birthday. In honor of that occasion, I would like to indulge in some wild speculation as to whether he and the other Beatles were angels.

Timothy Leary once declared "that The Beatles [were] Prototypes of evolutionary agents sent by God, endowed with a mysterious power to create a new human species, a young race of laughing freemen." (As quoted in Shout! (1981) by Philip Norman, p. 365; and in An Encyclopedia of Quotations about Music (1981) by Nat Shapiro, p. 303 [Link])

The Maharishi Mahesh Yogi told "George and Deepak Chopra that he could never be upset at the Beatles because he always knew they were angels on earth."

[Source: Beatles: Angels on Earth?]

The photographer of some unpublished photos of the Beatles also noted something special about the Pre-Fab Four: "I knew they were going to be successful because they had an aura, and months later they were world famous..."

[Source: "The Beatles new release: Unpublished pictures to go on display after they sat in an attic for 50 years"][Please support this blog by clicking on our sponsors' ad ~ Thanks!]

Charles Manson also believed the Beatles were angels, and that Revolution 9 from the White Album was a reference to the Holy Bible’s Revelations 9:

Revelations 9
From the Holy Bible

And in those days men shall seek death, and shall not find it; and
shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.

And the shapes of the locusts like unto horses prepared unto battle;

And on their heads as it were crowns like gold, and their faces as the faces of men.
And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as of lions.

And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their
wings was like the thundering of many horses and chariots rushing into battle.

And they had tails like unto scorpions, with stingers; with their
tails they had power to harm people for five months.

The locusts = The locusts can be an interpretation of insects, bugs or maybe beetles. The Beatles

Faces of men = The Beatles being men had faces of men.
As the hair of women = The Beatles had faces of men and the hair of women. Very original and unique to them for a time.

Breastplates of iron = their guitars with metal strings strapped to their chests
Sound like thundering horses and chariots rushing into battle = the sound of The Beatle’s loud amplified music.

Their tails they had power = The Beatles’ amplifiers had electric chords,
power chords= This is interesting in that the tails were not described as having venom or poison but instead “power.”

[Source: The Lennon Prophecy: A New Examination of the Death Clues of the Beatles]

In this back-masking done by Sunssol, it appears that the Beatles reject money, and seek peace and passion:

I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie

Ah...real tickets without peace
Ah, ah, ah, real tickets without peace
Ah, real tickets without peace...so
Here we burn and no peace
We now can reverse, now reversed
Ah...real tickets without peace
Ah, ah, ah, real tickets without peace
Ah, real tickets without peace...so
Heaven will watch it and we will all suffer
We now can reverse, now reversed...we will
We then have passion

At 6:20, this back-masking reveals "Paul is hare Krishna."

Krishna was the 8th incarnation of Vishnu.

...Saturn, the ascendant lord, acts as the Vishnu planet...
So it is clear that Saturn is representing Vishnu...[Source: ]http://www.osfa.org.uk/pt.htm

George wrote "Gopala Krishna," which was never released:

It is said that "[B]irds often symbolize the divine. They are often viewed as gods in disguise, or else they are the vehicles of gods and goddesses..."

[Source: Swan at http://www.khandro.net/animal_bird_swan.htm]

In Faul's video for the song, "This One," reference seems to be made to such an entity:

On the cover of Sgt. Pepper, is Faul trying to make a connection between himself and Vishnu/Krishna?

Terry Knight sang in "St. Paul":

"I think there's something wrong

It's taking you too long to change the world
Sir Isaac Newton told you it would fall."

Does this mean that Paul was supposed to change the world for the better but was thwarted by being replaced by someone who played for the "other team?"

David Icke forum member, Jo_6, made this observation:

...The original Beatles were a massive force for the light!
They were laughing lovely men who gave you a warm feeling inside, wrote ace music and obviously thoroughly enjoyed performing it live. I believe they were a massive force of goodness and love, with like an etheric gold shining energy coming from them.

The dark controlling forces do not let this be when it occurs in a way that effects the masses. (Look at JFK and Bob Marley). They do not want Light forces of truth and goodness to effect the masses and lift us up and wake us up. So they stamp on it and suppress it, snuff it out, nip it in the bud. And , perhaps this is what happened to the Beatles. They were a massive force that effected the masses, and they weren't going to 'co-operate' with the dark controlling forces...so they were took out. And to carry on with the juggernaut powerboat that was the Beatles, to keep cashing in and using them as a tool to manipulate the masses, they were replaced. Anyone close was bought off, or threatened, scared into submission...

[Source: David Icke Forum link]

Philip Norman, author of "Shout!," referred to the Beatles as "supernatural" in an interview at the beginning of this video:

These are all questions with no easy answers. They are interesting to ruminate and speculate upon, however.

__________________________________________________

Tina Foster is the author of

Plastic Macca: The Secret Death and Replacement of Beatle Paul McCartney &

The Splitting Image: Exposing the Secret World of Doubles, Decoys, and Impostor-Replacements

Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.

Tina's interviews on Youtube

Add Tina as a friend on MeWe

Forbidden Secrets of the Illuminati:

The Luciferian Deception

ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth

We can work it out

1/25/03 Daily Telegraph (London) 27

2003 WLNR 4174791

Daily Telegraph (UK)

Copyright © 2004 The Telegraph Group Limited, London. All rights reserved.

January 25, 2003

Section: NEWS

We can work it out

Craig Brown

Sub-Section:Way of the World

POSTER companies in America have airbrushed a cigarette from the hand of PaulMcCartney on the Beatles' Abbey Road album cover. They have performed this Leninist gesture in response to the anti-smoking lobby. In the late Sixties, the cigarette in question played a key role in a widely held conspiracy theory concerning the death of Paul McCartney. The rumour was rife that McCartney had died in a car crash, and had been replaced by a lookalike. On the cover of Abbey Road, "Paul" is barefoot (corpses are often buried without shoes), and his eyes are closed, as if dead. He is also out of step with the rest. The other Beatles are wearing tell-tale clothing: Ringo, dressed in black, is the pallbearer, George, in denim, is the gravedigger, and John, all in white, is the preacher. Behind them is a Volkswagen with the number plate "28 IF", signifying that Paul would have been 28 years old if he had lived. Furthermore - and this is where this week's news comes in - the lookalikePaul is holding his cigarette in his right hand, whereas every Beatles fan knows that the real Paul is left-handed. Spooky, indeed. It is quite a while - at least 25 years, in fact - since I last heard anyone repeating this great mound of evidence with a furrowed brow and a straight face. But with repetition, the list becomes peculiarly convincing. One can only hope that the air-brushing of Paul's cigarette by a person or persons unknown ignites afresh all the old conspiracy theories. Since the claims concern a celebrity, it can be only a matter of days before a 12-man police squad bursts into Sir Paul McCartney's home to ask him whether or not he is real. If he hesitates for even one second, he will be bundled off to the nearest police station, where he will be asked to run through the words of "Love Me Do" without hesitation, repetition or deviation. The police must get to the bottom of this great mystery for once and for all. If Sir Paul isn't Sir Paul, then who on earth is he? Tommy Steele? And how many others among our best-loved celebrities are being played by sinister impostors? Soon after the death of HM the Queen Mother, I noticed that "Sir Paul" began to take on her appearance. What does it all mean? Is the impostor making a bid for the Royal status? Alone among columnists, I am often hit by the feeling that I really don't know what to believe any more.

__________________________________________________

Tina Foster is the author of

Plastic Macca: The Secret Death and Replacement of Beatle Paul McCartney &

The Splitting Image: Exposing the Secret World of Doubles, Decoys, and Impostor-Replacements

Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.

Tina's interviews on Youtube

Forbidden Secrets of the Illuminati:

The Luciferian Deception

ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth

Music: This man isn't the real Mac

Paul McCartney (left) vs. Faul (right)

11/7/04 Sunday Mercury 40

2004 WLNR 10485825

Sunday Mercury (Birmingham, UK)

Copyright © 2004 MGN Ltd.

November 7, 2004

Section: Features

Music: This man isn't the real Mac

He's mean, he's outspoken and he's ugly. He's Ugly Phil, the Kerrang! radio host with his rock'n'droll column.

UGLY PHIL

I LOVE a conspiracy theory as much as the next guy.

I knew they'd faked the Moon landing long before the movie Capricorn One came along. The fact that OJ Simpson played one of the astronauts only helped to cement my convictions.

But if you want to tread the path of rock'n'roll conspiracies, well, take a seat. How long have you got?

Type 'music conspiracies' into your internet search engineand you'll find some evidence that'll make you kick yourself for missing the obvious clues in the first place.Paul McCartney's dead for starters. Well, the original one anyway!

He was replaced by a lookalike lefthanded bass-player early on, and the rest of The Beatles were sworn to secrecy.

Spurred no doubt by John Lennon, the now Fab Three tried to spill the beans with enigmatic album covers.

Just look at the cover of Abbey Road. What's the number plate on the Volkswagen in the background?

It's 28, the age Paul would have been had he lived. And Paul's barefoot, of course.

Look at the cover of Sgt Pepper. All those dead celebrities on the cover, andPaulwith a hand raised above his head - in the Egyptian death sign!

And, hey, it explains why his music went from brilliant to bloody awful almost overnight...

Spooky or what? Bottom line here, people. If you're Paul McCartney, then you're living a lie...

__________________________________________________

Tina Foster is the author of

Plastic Macca: The Secret Death and Replacement of Beatle Paul McCartney &

The Splitting Image: Exposing the Secret World of Doubles, Decoys, and Impostor-Replacements

Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.

Tina's interviews on Youtube

Forbidden Secrets of the Illuminati:

The Luciferian Deception

ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth

"You can't always tell the would be's from the real thing"

Mind Games: John Lennon vs. his look-alike double

This was posted by Getsmart, a fellow PID researcher and guest contributor, on the ATS forum [link]. It is an analysis of the Beatles August 28,1966 LA press conference. As has been discussed in a previous blog post, Was Paul McCartney replaCIAed in August 1966?, I believe this is the first public appearance of Faul as Paul McCartney. Getsmart posits this may also be the Lennon double.

In my opinion, John Lennon's name and image were hijacked to make "him" an ineffectual "leader" of the anti-war movement. In this way, the powers that be could control their opposition. John ONO Lennon and Yoko Ono gave MontyPython-esque interviews against the Vietnam war that made the peace activists look ridiculous, thus discrediting the whole peace movement. This is very similar to how Jim Morrison (the son of the admiral commanding at the false flag Gulf of Tonkin "attack") was planted as a "leader" of the anti-war movement. It just so happens that December 8 is the date for both Jim Morrison's birthday and Lennon's murder.

________________________

John Lennon vs. his look-alike double in the 1967 movie, "How I Won the War."

Here is a video of the August 28th, 1966 Los Angeles press conference in which some particularly interesting questions were asked.

After minute 5:00 John replies to the question:"What was the song Eleanor Rigby based upon?"

It is important to realize that this is a song which we now know to have been written on the basis of names on tombstones in St Peters Cemetery where both Paul and John used to roam when they first met. Here is a post which clarifies that John must have known exactly what Eleanor Rigby was based upon, but an impostor couldn't possibly fathom what.Source of The Beatles song Eleanor Rigby

John flippantly replies:"Two queers."

He then seems to be rather bothered by the ensuring hilarity from the crowd. He goes on to interrupt a journalist to correct himself, looking at Paul for a cue, and then says something difficult to make out any better than "Two battle boys" or "Two babble boys," thanks if you can help in deciphering that phrase.

I think that he was referring insultingly to the REAL PAUL and the REAL JOHN whom they have already replaced as their doubles, adding insult to injury by calling them "a couple of queers."

This smacks of "army talk" and does not in any way correspond to the vernacular used by open-minded sixties rebels. Was it because of that giveaway comment that then tried to correct himself? Did he get a signal from a handler to repair his glaring mistake?We have therefore been - and probably since this early date of August 28th, 1966 - in the presence of two impostors posing to the press and the public as the real John Lennon and the real Paul McCartney.

We are obviously not the only ones who noticed strange goings on insofar as The Beatles' identities were concerned, and because of this broad concern among many witnesses, the journalist was then brought to pointedly ask another question - note that this was way back in the summer of 1966:

"Have you ever trained or used Beatle Doubles as DECOYS?

John replies meekly "No... No..." and Paul meekly echoes an identical mimicked "No...No..."and then adds:"We tried to get Brian Epstein to do it, he wouldn't do it."This may well be revealing of why Brian Epstein was assassinated, unwilling he was to assist the murder and replacement of his band members.

In the same press conference video, at minute 6:38 a journalist asks Paul who does Beatles songs the best. Paul looks about as if 'obviously' The Beatles themselves would do Beatles songs the best, but then looks furtively at an equally silent John and embarrassed, he doesn't reply. Obviously they knew they were totally lame as replacement musicians and unable to "do Beatles songs properly," so they both chose to clam up.

At minute 9:41 FAUL gives us his first in a very long series of false identity confessions, with the following statement:

"We know our Real Image which is nothing like our image."

Upon the crowd's uproar he adds loudly:"Forget it !"

Apparently we are not to remember what he says when he has an unconscious lapse. He also possibly thought he'd cleared up his unintentional leak by issuing a 'command' such as those used when coaching mind controlled impostors. Smiling at the crowd, he then looked furtively at someone in the public to his front left, at which time his smile suddenly turns to a frown and he says:"What I meant to say..." followed by silence, hiding his eyes with his hand, not knowing how to get out of his predicament by another statement given that the initiative was not his own but probably commanded by a handler in the audience. John comes to his rescue with another flippant remarks that sounds something like "I like sticks or bricks" although I possibly inaccurately deciphered what John said at minute 10:00.

At minute 12:35 John uses a common impostor 'question avoidance' tactic by replying "No comment" to a simple question about a public statement he had recently made to a journalist and which had been published in the press. Faul, noticing that his response was unsatisfactory and maybe not wanting to be the only one looking like a loser in front of their 'agency impostor handlers' - taunted John saying "Come on, John, tell them what you mean." Thus pressured by his co-conspirator's prompting, John nevertheless was unable to reply to a clear question for any politically structured individual such as John Lennon was purported to be. Here is the question along with John's clueless answer:

QUESTION: "Show Business is an extension of the Jewish religion. Would you mind amplifying that?"

John Lennon:"I mean, you can read into it what you like. It's just a little old statement. I was not very serious about it."

QUESTION: "And those words, how did you piece them together?"

John Lennon:"Oh, I don't know..."

Was John Lennon someone who lent himself to making trivial statements about fundamental political matters? Hardly. On this subject, here is what Texe Marrs confirms:Do The Jews Own Hollywood And The Media?

Let us please remember that this is not the Jewish people nor the Jewish religion, but only a small group of fanatics who have infiltrated several nations among which Israel and the USA and who hide behind judaism to dissimulate their plans which have nothing to do with the welfare of anyone Jewish. They are Zionists, and as our current US Vice-President so eloquently puts it, this has nothing to do with being Jewish. The Zionists are the Illuminati

We know that the Zionists were behind WWII and are fully enmeshed with the CIA and the Illuminati. As evidence, here is how Zionist Jacob Rothschild designed the Israeli Supreme Court filled with Illuminati symbolism, acting in mockery of the honest and honorable citizens of Israel, a Zionist movement that this video says is ANTISEMETIC. The Zionists are Illuminati USURPERS of Judaism

John Lennon obviously knew about this, at least insofar as it extended to the music industry and show business at large. He was quoted by the press for such strong opposition and public statements, which explains why John was replaced, and Paul obviously along with him. John and Paul were rebellious enough for their Agency impostors to find it politically correct in those reactionary times to call them "Two queers". Pardon me if I don't share their sense of humor defiling the dignity of two honorable young men who served humanity with their duty to the TRUTH.

At the end of the Los Angeles video, at minute 14:00 John goes so far as to declare right before turning to Paul laughing:

"You can't always tell the would be's from the real thing."

Let us remember that

The Beatles were a deeply politicized band, something which was obscured by their drift into mindless psychedelic spaced out apolitical passivity from Sgt Pepper onwards. Today they appear as either naive lyric artists when looking at their early days to an apogee of studio musicians and 64 track mixed sound effects to blow out your mind on drugs. The hard edge was entirely LOBOTOMIZED from their music as if their minds had been removed, something which was apparently done by also removing and replacing their bodies with look-alikes.

Getsmart

__________________________________________________

Tina Foster is the author of

Plastic Macca: The Secret Death and Replacement of Beatle Paul McCartney &

The Splitting Image: Exposing the Secret World of Doubles, Decoys, and Impostor-Replacements

Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.

Tina's interviews on Youtube

Forbidden Secrets of the Illuminati:

The Luciferian Deception

ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth