Saturday, December 12, 2009

Was Paul McCartney replaCIAed in August 1966? (updated)


My research indicates that Paul McCartney was replaceed in late August 1966. I am confident it was Paul during the 19 August 1966 Memphis interview and in Seattle on August 25. "Paul" seems different during the 28 August 1966 LA interview. In the 28 August interview, "Paul" keeps putting his hand up to his face as though to casually hide it, as though self conscious and maybe trying to prevent anyone from noticing subtle differences between him and Paul. Is the Paul of August 28 just a Paul impersonator? Granted, he does a great job of impersonating Paul, but if you watch these clips carefully, you will probably pick up on differences. I believe it is, in fact, a double on August 28, 1966. Therefore, I believe that the timeframe for Paul's replacement is sometime between August 19, 1966 and August 28, 1966.

August 19, 1966 - Paul in Memphis



Aug 28, 1966 - is this Faul?



Aug 19 - Memphis







On the left is a picture from Sept. 1966 at the Melody Maker Music Awards. Compare to a picture of Paul from Aug. 19, 1966.





[Please support this blog by clicking on our sponsors' ads - Thanks!]

Compare this Sept. picture to Faul from June 1967's famous LSD interview:




This is Faul in a June 1967 interview (promoting the psychochemical warfare agent, LSD) with the Independent Television News (ITN):


Paul from Aug. 19, 1966 compared to "Paul" on Aug. 29, 1966. In the picture on the right, Paul, or his double, is disembarking from the plane in San Francisco. This would be the last Beatles concert.






Eggman9 noticed a circular mark or scar on "Paul's" face in San Francisco that seems consistent with a mark that is evident on later pictures of Faul, aka Bill.





This mark does not appear to have marred Paul's face. Paul from "Paperback Writer," 1966:

I predict that "new" pictures of Paul will begin flooding the Internet with that mark now that it has been pointed out. Watch for it...

The Beatles would never play live again after Paul's replacement (not counting the impromptu roof-top concert at Twickenham Studios).
After the group played a concert at Candlestick Park in San Francisco on 29 August 1966, they announced that they would stop touring.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beatles_in_1966
In this video from the Rotten Apple series, it says the following at 0:48:

09 11 1966 04:00 pm
Brian Epstein announces the Beatles will never play live again




Nov 09
Wednesday
Brian phones Arthur Howes, telling him they won't accept more live
performances.

I am confident Paul was gone by the time this announcement was made. 9 11 1966 is an interesting date to choose. Perhaps it was chosen for its numerological significance?

Here are some observations by Getsmart:

The following photo is from The Beatles' Press Conference at Los Angeles Dodger Stadium taken immediately before their concert on Sunday August 28th, 1966.


The image was not reversed, as can be ascertained by the button placement on George and John's jackets. Ringo appears anxious and George and John are sullen. Paul has grown taller than any of his mates, his left hand is passively at his belt, where you position your rarely used secondary hand. He is smoking very nervously with his right hand, and in so doing partially masking his face for the photo. Dodger Stadium was "Opening Night" for Sir Paul.

Edit (11/12/10): It appears that photos from the Aug. 25, 1966 concert in Seattle were recycled and portrayed as being from San Francisco a few days later. In my opinion, the photos from Seattle are of Paul. Therefore, the time frame for the replacement seems to be between Aug. 25 and 28, 1966. More on that to come.

______________________

Tina Foster

Join the discussion - Paul is Dead: Miss Him forum



ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth


Order Forbidden Secrets of the Illuminati



     



     


     


8 comments:

  1. Hello, I was wondering if you believe the theory that the British intelligence agency MI6 had anything to do with the Paul coverup? I had been hearing the name Maxwell as being the man from MI5 that was to make sure that Paul's death stayed covered up. I did some digging and found out that there was a Maxwell who worked for MI5. Maxwell Knight. What's more is that he was an agent for MI5 from the 1940's- 1968 ( when he died of a heart attack) This information proved EXTREMELY interesting to me and perhaps it is as well to you. Also, perhaps there are hidden meaning behind the song 'Maxwell's silver hammer." Since Maxwell was supposedly the agent who was to enforce the Beatles stay quiet about Paul's death. Any thoughts or opinions?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow. This is interesting and now I am even more confused that previously! Is there any possibility that the image of Paul/Faul getting off of the plane has been tampered with and Faul's face placed in it? Did I also notice that Paul/Faul is smoking with his right hand in both of the interview videos, even the earlier one in Memphis? So, if this is true that Paul was replaced while he was here on tour in America, then did he die here? If so, what caused his death here? Thanks again for great information.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think Paul was switched after the Seattle show on August 25, 1966 and before the LA press conference on Austust 28, 1966. I think Paul was shot, the body disposed of, & a double installed (see "Paul, they had him murdered" at http://plasticmacca.blogspot.com/2009/11/my-theory-paul-was-murdered.html). Pictures of the Seattle show have been recycled & passed off as being from the Candlestick show. The last Beatles concert ever has been brushed under the rug. Wouldn't one think they would exploit the hell out of it? I think the impostor was on stage at that point, & the show didn't go so well. The Beatles apparently took a vacation in LA on Aug. 26-27, where they were more or less in seclusion. If you have read the "Inside the LC" series by Dave McGowan, then you will know how dangerous it is to live in Hollywood - all sorts of suspicious celebrity deaths happen there. Anyway, that's my take on it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Also see Condensed (condemned?) Cream of the Beatles' clues about PID at http://plasticmacca.blogspot.com/2010/02/paul-was-murdered-clues-in-condensed.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wondered if you have heard of Sherry (not sure sp. of first name) Edwards? Web site www.nanovoice.com Using sound wave technology which is free to download a voice is identified as false or real.
    No wonder the Beatles split up. I wonder who his connections were in the US? Has anyone got DNA evidence or fingerprints?

    ReplyDelete
  6. That is interesting about the voice technology. Thanks - will look into it.

    The problem w/ DNA evidence now is there is no chain of custody. How do we know something was from Paul.

    Fingerprints would be good if we could get ahold of an old passport of Paul's or something. Maybe the visa to Germany would have Paul's prints. Many have suspected that Faul's hold up in Japan in 1980 was due to a mismatch of fingerprints. Paul had been there in 1966, & Faul's prints are obviously not going to match...

    ReplyDelete
  7. he was held up in Japan in 1980 because of marijuana possession? anyway his fingerprints didn't match with the one from Liverpool!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hid DNA didnt match a child he fathered from a german girl. She said he wasent the real Paul and she would know

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.