
Faul's false ears are considered by some to be the "smoking gun" that Paul McCartney was replaced. Let's take a look at what Paul McCartney's ears looked like first. As you can see, the earlobes were attached.

Now, let us take a look at some pictures of Faul's ears. Sometimes they look unattached, sometimes they look just plain fake.

Paul McCartney & Wings - Mull of Kintyre [live '1977]
Here are some more pictures showing obvious anatomical differences between the ears of Faul and Paul.
[Please support this blog by clicking on our sponsors' ads - Thanks!]
I don't know how much plainer it can be that those are not the same ears. This was also the conclusion of two Italian forensics experts, Francesco Gavazzeni and Carlesi Gabriella in an article in the August 2009 Italian issue of WIRED magazine. This is a machine translation of part of the article:...Technically called trago [tragus: http://www.westone.com/content/234.html]. All we have two, one by ear, but the characteristics are different for every human being. ‘In Germany, a recognition procedure craniometric, identification of the right ear is even tantamount to fingerprint, ie the collection of fingerprints,’ recalls Carlesi. But what is trago? It is the small cartilage covered with skin that overhangs the entrance to the ear and ear canal, like the whole ear, cannot be changed surgically. How then to explain the differences between the right ear of Paul McCartney in a previous snapshot to 1966 and probably a built in the late nineties? It is not only to betray trago a different conformation as well as other parts, just above the ear canal entrance, measurements and dell'antelice propeller. Things that ordinary mortals might seem irrelevant or unclear, but instead, every day, allowing the experts to locate and identify persons, bodies, photographs...
"Ask Who Was the 'Beatle,'" http://tinyurl.com/mw83db
This is an interesting picture. It seems that "Paul" on the right has had some Photoshop work done on his ear. Maybe it was for the benefit of people who have noticed differences in the ears? An attempt to change history maybe?
EDIT: Here is some information on using ear biometrics to identify people. In this case, the different ears can be used to detect the imposter.
...When employing face or lip as a biometric, changing of their appearance with the expression of the subject creates problem but in case of ear the shape and appearance is fixed.
...Identification by ear biometrics is promising because it is passive like face recognition, but instead of the difficulties to extract face biometrics, it uses robust and simply extracted biometrics like those in fingerprinting. The ear is a unique feature of human beings. Even the ears of “identical twins” differ in some respects. There are persons in crime laboratories that assume that the human external ear characteristics are unique to each individual and unchanging during the lifetime of an adult...Person Identification Using Ear Biometrics
Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Md. Rashedul Islam, Nazmul Islam Bhuiyan, Bulbul Ahmed, Md. Aminul Islamhttp://www.journal.au.edu/ijcim/2007/may07/IJCIMvol15no2_article1.pdf
... All we have two, one by ear, but the characteristics are different for every human being. "In Germany, a recognition procedure craniometrico, identification of the right ear even tantamount to fingerprint, ie the collection of fingerprints," recalls Carlesi. But what trago? It is the small cartilage covered with skin that overhangs the entrance to the ear and ear canal, like the whole ear, not be changed surgically ...ASK WHO WAS THE "BEATLE"
Fabio Gigante Andriola and Alessandra | 15 July 2009http://tinyurl.com/mw83db
EDIT: A member of Macca's Fun House - a forum with the express purpose of suppressing the Truth about PID - is trying to use this doctored photo as "proof" that Paul's and Faul's ears are "the same." It has been sufficiently proven that the ears were markedly different.
ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth |
![]() |
| Order Forbidden Secrets of the Illuminati |

















What a truly excellent post ! You have really hit the nail on the head !!!
ReplyDeleteA Very Good Analysis.
ReplyDeleteThe "Queen" is exposed.
Now and Forever
Sun King
Sun King,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment. It's an honor, Sir.
The Truth will be exposed!
Tina
I remember the days when the Beatles were in fashion, music was very popular.
ReplyDeleteThe Eyes and Ears have it as the saying goes and that alone would be enough to establish these are two distinct and different people. Also the one thing that never changes in a face is the lines of symmetery. If you are 25 or 75 they remain consistent unless surgically altered which would be quite involved : not common cosmetic procedures.
ReplyDeleteThe jaw width is inconsistent, the nose length and angle are inconsistent, the head shape is inconsistent, and the face length is inconsistent.
your work is perfect
ReplyDeletethank you tina
my uncle,an english teacher at the time,told me in the late 70's about this "legend" concerning paul being replaced. I was young, and i didn't even understand what he was meaning!
thanks to your work, things are clear now.
Okay, I found it. The photo below me is officially without a doubt the WORST set of Faul's prosthetic ears of all time. You truly have to see this to believe it, Plastic Macca. Not only do they look hopelessly fake but they DON'T EVEN HAVE HOLES. It's a solid hunk of plastic. Please put this photo on your blog or on your photobucket because it's...unbelievable.
ReplyDeleteTo view it simply copy and paste into your web address bar to view (don't google it, because it doesn't work that way). Please let me know what you think!
http://cgi.ebay.com/VINTAGE-PAUL-MCCARTNEY-CANDID-PHOTO-BEATLES-/110656102669?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item19c39e210d
^ Thank you for sending that picture of Faul's fake ear. It looks like his earlobe has been gnawed off by a rabid dog. I posted it to the PID Miss Him forum & the Doppelganger forum. Good stuff. Keep it coming! :)
ReplyDeleteTina
coo, the pics are great
ReplyDeleteI am really concerned, why would his parents and the other beatles keep up the lie? Didn't they care about Paul at all? I mean they MUST have noticed it wasn't the same person. Hw could they just phase him out and not tell anyone, I am so confused. I guess I need more answers, I really need to know why they keept the charade up.
ReplyDelete>AnonymousDecember 30, 2011 8:56 PM
Delete>I am really concerned, why would his parents and the other beatles keep up the lie? Didn't >they care about Paul at all? I mean they MUST have noticed it wasn't the same person. Hw >could they just phase him out and not tell anyone, I am so confused. I guess I need more >answers, I really need to know why they keept the charade up.
Google thebeatlesneverexisted messageboard. They with pictures too, present evidence that all the other Beatles had doppelgangers too, and the doubles of Paul appeared indistintinctly in recordings, tours, etc. so PiD would be a wrong theory, because there never was a PWM. I've seen pictures of "Pauls" of all sizes, heights and musculatures and weird pictures of several Ringos with different neck lenghts.
The family & friends may have been bribed &/or threatened to keep silent. Heather Mills almost spilled the beans (we think), but she got death threats, so clammed up.
ReplyDeletehttp://plasticmacca.blogspot.com/2009/09/what-does-heather-mills-know.html
I created a fade between two of the images above (locking the retina, chin, and ears) and the facial features don't blend proportionately IMHO...especially the nose which simply isn't the same structure...and the ear characteristics differ as well...
ReplyDeletehttp://i45.tinypic.com/2pr65ut.gif
He's a fairly good double, I'll give him that, but certainly not 100%.
Culd you publish an overlay photo with faul and paul? Very plausible theory about Faul. Nothing surprises me anymore. Good work, please keep it up.Thanks.
ReplyDeleteCud you publish an overlay photo with Faul and Paul. Very interesting stuff. Thanks for the good work. Nothing surprises me anymore. Wish I had a clone to do my housework!!
ReplyDeleteFascinating stuff. Cud you publish an overlay photo with Faul and Paul?
ReplyDeleteHi again, please watch this video of a post Beatles song, here at 0:49 you can see a glued ear and if you pause it, obvious signs of multiple plastic surgeries (around 0:49 too)
ReplyDeletehttp://youtu.be/IrthE_waCV8
In this particular video I alerted to, http://youtu.be/IrthE_waCV8 , I'm sure now that it's just a trick of light and a strand of loose hair. But the signs and marks of plastic surgeries are real and evident. (they wouldn't do a sloppy work and give him latex ears IMO)
DeleteWatch George Harrison's last testament. It is on Netflix and I am sure you can find it other places as well. It has a lot of answers and I believe it to be clear that the Paul that claims to be Paul is indeed not the original. The truth is not only apparent in the facts, The spirit of Paul is just not alive in Faul. Instead of abandoning the remaining Beatles, let us understand the grace they carried Paul on in music and art.
ReplyDelete"The Last Testament of George Harrison" is complete disinfo rubbish! It is based on the 60IF document, which has many problems with it. One day, I will do an expose on the Last Testament, which for starters, was not George Harrison! It is just another example how well-funded projects can Faulsify reality. Oh well. At least, it shows that Paul was replaced, even if the under-lying story is BS & meant to divert people from the Truth.
ReplyDeleteTina, since the photo http://cgi.ebay.com/VINTAGE-PAUL-MCCARTNEY-CANDID-PHOTO-BEATLES-/110656102669?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item19c39e210d is now missing (sold) and you didn't put a link to where you'd reposted it -- thank you for saving it -- can you provide the link to it? It was on the forum, you said.
ReplyDeleteUnbelievably true! Too crazy of a "story" to just make up. The facts are in their music, album covers, Paul and fauls ears, and the length of Paul and fauls head. Too creepy! But George did give thanks to Faul for helping the beatles continue on :) so I guess we should as well, but it did not and does not give Faul the right to continue to stay in the lime light as Paul. Paul should have been put to rest when the beatles, the true beatles, were put to rest.
ReplyDelete