Monday, February 23, 2015

Opperman Report | Tina Foster : Paul Is Dead 2015 02 20

Monday, February 16, 2015

CHIEDI CHI ERA QUELL BEATLE? Comments on Paul McCartney's replacement (by Anonymous)

Gabriella Carlesi is an Italian forensic pathologist with a subspecialty in odontology (the study of teeth) [link to Wired article]. Her life's work involves identification of people through craniometry -- the scientific comparison of skull features. These scientific analyses have been carried out with Carlesi's partner, Francesco Gavazzeni, a computer scientist. Since the 1990s, this pair of forensic sleuths have used their dual expertise to work on a number of high profile forensic identification cases. 

In 2008, Carlesi and Gavazzeni became interested in tackling the James Paul McCartney replacement conspiracy. They originally attempted to disprove the legend of Paul McCartney's replacement. However, the researchers discovered, much to their surprise, that they confirmed the replacement. After images of Paul McCartney, taken before as well as after late 1966, were compared, the professionals were shocked to discover that they simply did not match. 

Their findings were published in the July 15, 2009 issue of WIRED ITALIA, the Italian edition of the U.S. magazine, WIRED. To ensure proper photographic comparison of Paul's face over time, the photos had to be re-sized to scale. The researchers chose to use the inter-pupillary distance to scale the facial features. After the photos were scaled to pupil distance, they were placed over each other for comparative visual examination. The photos taken before late 1966 did not match those taken after late 1966. 

One of the first noted differences was the frontal jaw curvature. The replacement Paul's head was clearly more oblong than that of the original Paul. The differences found in the mandibular curve between the two sets of photos showed a stark discrepancy of over six per cent, well beyond the margin of error. In photos of the real Paul taken before late 1966, each side of Paul’s jaw was composed of two curves, whereas photos of the replacement Paul taken since 1967 demonstrated his face to be comprised of only a single curve. Carlesi pointed out that the width of the line that separated the original Paul’s lips was much different than that of the replacement Paul. The identifiable point at which the nose protruded from the face was also different. The dental features of the original Paul McCartney were also quite notably different compared to those of the replacement Paul. 

The analysis also found wildly bizarre characteristics of the ears -- this consistent with the well-known phenomenon of photographic tampering carried out on many of the photos dated before late 1966, which were found to have been altered to make the facial features of the replacement Paul appear more like those of the original Paul. Doctor Carlesi was most amazed with the differences in the shape of the hard palate, which is unalterable without significant plastic surgery. Any surgery that would alter the hard palate shape would have necessitated approximately a year or more of recovery time. The man known as Paul McCartney is not historically known to have undergone any significant cranial surgery and, for sure, was never shown to have been in a year-long post-operative recovery phase. Aside from that, there would have been no obvious reason for the original Paul to have had his hard palate surgically fractured and reset. 

The forensic researchers suggest that if the man referred to as Paul McCartney wanted to put an end to the rumors of his replacement, then he could submit to a DNA test -- clearly pointing to the infamous early 1980s paternity case in which the replacement Paul McCartney submitted a DNA sample in Germany. At that time, a German woman named Bettina Krischbin, known as the REAL Paul McCartney's REAL love child, claimed that her 1962 birth certificate shows that McCartney is her father. The DNA submitted by the Paul that showed up to submit the DNA sample did not match sufficiently with that of Ms. Bettina Krischbin (McCartney) [link to article about DNA test]. OF COURSE, the DNA did not match. The replacement Paul McCartney is NOT Bettina's birth father. If Paul was her father, it would have been the ORIGINAL Paul. Having the DNA of the REAL Paul McCartney, not of the replacement Paul, would be necessary to prove that the child was sired by the genuine James Paul McCartney. 

After the original DNA test was found to not be a match, Bettina Krischbin accused Paul McCartney of sending a substitute to donate his DNA for the test. Well, in essence, the Paul McCartney that showed up to submit a DNA sample WAS INDEED a substitute, but he was not sent by the real Paul, whose whereabouts to most of the world have been unknown since late August 1966 [see link].

It was also claimed by Bettina Krischbin (McCartney) that the signature produced by the Paul McCartney who showed up to submit the DNA sample was that of a right-handed individual, not of the TRUE LEFT HANDED PAUL [see link]. 

In 2006, the German authorities re-opened the legal case for Krischbin's (McCartney's) paternity claim. If Paul McCartney was ultimately proven to be the father of Bettina Krischbin, then Ms. Krischbin would have been due to receive 10% of McCartney's estate upon his death. Clearly, the Krischbin legal team did not understand at the time that the REAL PAUL McCARTNEY was not available for DNA submission. If it had, then the members of that legal team would have known that Bettina Krischbin had ZERO chance of ever proving that she was the love child of the real Paul McCartney. 

Interestingly, on July 15, 2009 (the same date on which WIRED ITALIA released Carlesi's and Gavazzeni's data which proved that Sir Paul McCartney was not the original Paul McCartney), the replacement McCartney gave an outdoor musical performance in New York City, and then later that day, appeared on the David Letterman Show at the Ed Sullivan Theatre/Studio 50 at CBS Manhattan (where the ORIGINAL Beatles - including the GENUINE James Paul McCartney - performed for millions of people on American television back on February 9, 1964) [see link].

During that Letterman interview, the imposter Paul McCartney nervously laughed with Letterman when they discussed the rumor of his death. The interview was even more interesting to those of us who understand the body language of liars, as the replacement Paul McCartney fully projected the body language of an abject liar during that interview, perceptible to even the most amateur of body language students. 

This lie-fest included the ridiculous lie that the replacement Paul told Letterman's audience about taking his shoes off for the Abbey Road album cover photo shoot "because it was hot." The last thing any human being would want to do when it is truly hot outside is to remove one's shoes, which would expose the feet to burning hot ground temperature. 

The timing of this July 15, 2009 Manhattan performance/Letterman appearance seems suspicious for being planned on the same day as the release of the Wired Magazine article, perhaps to help provide a distraction for the mind-controlled robots of the world by diverting their attention from the facts of the case. 

This would all be laughable, except for the fact that the replacement McCartney has been besmirching the personality of the original Paul McCartney, who was a soft spoken, laid back, really cool guy and a champion of the people (pushing for A 432 Hz musical tuning and planning to write a musical score for Mark Lane's movie about JFK, Rush to Judgment). 

If one considers that the replacement McCartney cavorted with Charles Manson via Terry Melcher before the Manson murders and that Malcolm Evans was executed in cold blood by insider Charles Higby a mere few hours after the replacement McCartney negotiated with Mal to pay him royalties for well-known contributions to the Sergeant Pepper album--it suggests that replacement McCartney is the opposite of his public persona of being a good guy. 


~ submitted by Anonymous


Tuesday, January 27, 2015

The Tragical History of PID - Part 2

In September 1969, Tim Harper reported on the latest West Coast college gossip, namely that McCartney had died in a car crash in 1966. On September 17, 1969, Harper’s article, “Is Beatle Paul McCartney Dead?” was published in the Drake Times-Delphic paper. Days later, college papers all over the country were running the story, and the news of McCartney’s demise swept across America. 

Various clues as to Paul’s death were found by fans desperate for answers. One of the cluesters was Tom Zarski. He and his friends found back-masked messages on the White Album. On October 12, 1969, he called into Russ Gibb’s Detroit radio show to inform everyone that Beatle Paul was dead. 

Zarski made it known that there was something fishy going on with Paul McCartney. According to Zarski, several tracks on the Beatles’ White Album contained backwards messages revealing the truth about Paul’s death. For example, “Revolution #9” was said to disclose the sounds of a fiery car crash when played backwards. The oft-repeated phrase “number nine, number nine” revealed the dark message, “turn me on, dead man, turn me, on dead man” when played backwards. The song, “I'm So Tired,” concealed the back-masked message, “Paul is a dead man, miss him, miss him, miss him.” More clues about McCartney’s death were found in other Beatles’ songs and album covers. 

During the show, thousands of listeners were glued to the radio as Gibb and his callers discussed the evidence and what could be behind “The Great Cover-up.” One of those listeners was a student named Fred LaBour, who wrote a review of the Beatles’ album, Abbey Road, for the college newspaper the next day. On October 14, 1969, the Michigan Daily reported “McCartney dead; new evidence brought to light.” According to LaBour’s article, “Paul McCartney was killed in an automobile accident in early November, 1966 after leaving EMI recording studios tired, sad, and dejected.” LaBour reported that McCartney had been found four hours later, “pinned under his car in a culvert with the top of his head sheared off. He was deader than a doornail.” LaBour proclaimed the accident had been covered up and a double found to replace McCartney. 

The national press picked up the story, which “was quoted extensively everywhere. First the Detroit papers, then Chicago, then, by the weekend, both coasts.” On October 21, 1969, the London Times published a report on the “Paul is Dead” rumor. The next day, The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times ran the story. The possibility that McCartney could be dead was discussed on the “evening news of all three major television networks, and in prestigious national magazines such as Time and Life.” 

Many people started to investigate the possibility of McCartney’s death and to look for clues on Beatles’ records, such as backwards messages and photographic clues. The sale of Beatles’ albums skyrocketed as those searching for clues bought copies just to play them backwards. More than 400 clues were eventually found. 




Sunday, January 18, 2015

"Let Me Weep": PID poem dedicated to JPM by Robin Gilmore

Let Me Weep

Ocean flow... Ocean deep
hold the love... let him sleep
You left without a warning
Who could have seen it storming?
No one to hear you singing your last song
They didn't understand you
They walked away and left you
They locked the doors..destroying every key
Fly... please don't cry
Like a sea bird gently drifts upon the breeze
Let your wings catch the wind
Take you where you've never been
With the sunrise you are free
Ocean Red... Ocean Blue
There's still a light that shines on you
Perhaps someday everyone will see
And we won't let it be

~ Robin Gilmore




Wednesday, December 31, 2014

"Sigh... all." --- A coincidence, synchronicity, or intentional?

Always looking for more than meets the eye on the cover of the Sgt. Pepper album, I found that if you list the first letter of the first name and the first letter of the last name of each person represented in sequence in the rows (top row, second row, third row, front row), but vertically in columns, you get...

YG          AB         SS          SL
AC          RP          ??          PG ("Pretty Girl")
MW        AH         MM        GH
LB          DT          PG          JL
KS          TS          MB         ST
WF         DD         TM         RS
CJ           TC          OW        PM
EP          WB         TP          AE
FA          TH          LB          JL
RM         MM        DL         RS
VG         WB         JW         PM
HH         MB         SC        GH
SR          SL          IB          BB
BD         RL          GS        MD
              OH          HW       AC
              KM         AS         DD
              HW         LM        ST
              PY           LC
              JJ             TL

Question: "How many Beatles died and were replaced?"
Answer: "(*sigh*) All."

Another interesting Pepper question...
In 1966, BBC Television produced a film of Alice in Wonderland that aired on December 28, 1966.

In the film, which is set in Victorian England, of course, there is a marching band and there are Victorian-era uniforms. There is a scene with a character dressed in uniform and the word "peppers" is spoken.

No doubt, the Beatles knew many of the figures involved in that production... Peter Sellers, Wilfrid Brambell, Leo McKern, and Ravi Shankar wrote the theme and performs on the soundtrack.

The film can be borrowed from Netflix in the USA. It seems to be the darkest and least child-friendly of any film version of the book. It was clearly made for adults. Low key on special effects, nevertheless it does seem somewhat psychedelic. Remember, in May of 1966, The Pretty Things performed their song, LSD, on BBC Radio, so there's no doubt that dropping acid was in the London culture during 1966. In March of that year, the butcher cover was shot. Revolver came out in August '66 in the UK, so psychedelic music was evolving in that year and would be in full bloom with the release of Sgt. Pepper in early 1967. Reportedly, the Beatles began using LSD in 1965.

So, my question is, did any Beatle visit the set of the BBC Alice in Wonderland production sometime in 1966? I don't know the production dates of the film, only its premiere date (28 Dec. 1966). I know the Beatles were touring the far east and then later, the USA, but they were in London on occasion, that year.

My suspicion is that the inspiration for the Victorian-era, military uniforms, the Victorian military brass band motif, and get this... "peppers" came from that 1966 BBC film version of Alice in Wonderland. The Beatles could have certainly gained access to the location or studio shoots (the 'peppers' scene is in studio).

Combine the fact that the Beatles were using LSD and somehow got a sneak peek of the shooting or editing of the film version of one of John Lennon's favorite books and you have possibly the roots of some essential elements of the Sgt. Pepper concept.
I recommend getting the film from Netflix and seeing for yourself. Here's a taste of it...

Ravi Shankar's theme...

Some scenes in slo-mo with recent music...

Another little bit of trivia... one really spooky scene is Alice walking down a row of tall windows with tattered, sheer curtains in a large, old building (no furniture)...

The scene was shot in an abandoned mental hospital used for 'shell shocked' men returning from the World Wars. Psychiatrist R. D. Laing had worked there. Laing was involved with Tavistock, this from wiki...
"In 1956 Laing went on to train on a grant at the Tavistock Clinic in London, widely known as a centre for the study and practice of psychotherapy (particularly psychoanalysis). At this time, he was associated with John Bowlby, D. W. Winnicott and Charles Rycroft. He remained at the Tavistock Institute until 1964.
One imagines that Dr. Laing and Dr. Asher were well acquainted and perhaps close colleagues. So, another interesting question would be, how and why did Jonathan Miller's film shoot of Alice in Wonderland for BBC Television find a shooting location connected with Tavistock and Drs. Laing and Asher?

Needless to say, I think the film seems to connect some dots, maybe. 




Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Faul does best Paul McCartney impersonation - Jimmy Fallon

Jimmy Fallon recently told Faul McCartney that he does the best Paul McCartney impersonation. Why yes. Isn't that why he got the part? You have to read between the lines sometimes. They are just putting it out there that Faul is a double.

Paul McCartney Names His Favorite Ringo Starr Songs




Tuesday, December 16, 2014

Tara’s car crash… real or faked?

Everyone who follows PID knows the ‘official story’ of Tara Browne, Guinness heir and friend of The Beatles, being killed in a tragic car crash that, we are told, partially formed the inspiration for lyrics in A Day In The Life on the Sgt. Pepper album. Here are the basics in the Daily Mail Online in 2012…
Aside from John Huston calling Tara’s mother a witch (we won’t go there, although it is quite tempting), some of the so-called ‘facts’ in the case seem odd.
See also…
Let’s look at some troubling statements from these articles, as well as the famous ‘crash’ photo.
The Daily Mail calls their report ‘the true story,’ so they are pretty sure of themselves, but maybe they are perpetuating old lies. Right, so Tara slams his Lotus into the side of a parked van at 120 mph, does he? Here’s the famous crash photo…
 Does that look like a car that has slammed into anything at 120 mph? Here’s a crash test at 120 mph…
Now granted, the Ford Focus was made from different materials than a sixties Lotus, but does Tara’s car look like it hit a parked van at 120 mph?
Looks more like the Lotus was parked behind the old car you can see parked in front of it and someone gave the Lotus repeated blows with a sledgehammer. A swinging sledgehammer could have bashed the top back to rest on the rear of the car, mangled the driver’s side dash and knocked in the steering column, and the head of the sledgehammer could have made the odd gashes we see on the driver’s side of the Lotus. Whatever made the gashes and holes in the car’s body, it’s plain to see that the body was made of fiberglass, not steel. A steel body would dent, not show gashes and holes like that. Would a fiberglass car body hold up better than the body of a Ford Focus crashing at 120 mph? No, it would have splintered into bits and been crushed like the Ford Focus in the video crash test. No front seat survivors possible. Lots of blood.
Personally, I’m convinced someone bashed into ‘Tara’s car’ with a sledgehammer. Were they trying to make it look like a crash or was someone angry at Tara and did the clubbing (while Tara and reportedly Suki Poitier were indoors doing a different kind of clubbing)? Where’s the white van in the photo? Nowhere to be seen. According to the Abbey Road album (if one makes the connection as so many have) it was not a white van, but a ‘yellow lorry slow, nowhere to go’ (meaning you couldn’t avoid it at high speed). If there was ‘nowhere to go,’ he would have hit the yellow lorry, not a parked white van.
Interestingly in the Beatles Bible articles, just by pure coincidence, Tara was swerving to avoid an oncoming Volkswagen. A Beetle, right? Why not? There’s one parked in Abbey Road on the cover and we see the mystical Beetle in Stanley Kubrick films and Apple promos and films. Didn’t want to hit that Beetle, did he?
Would anyone have been angry at Tara at the time? His estranged wife, Nicki, for one. Her father, for another. Can’t blame me for speculating, when I’m just ‘reading between the lines’ of these articles. I’m not imagining Nicki herself wielding a sledgehammer, but I’ve heard that thugs were and are available for hire in Jolly Old London town, not to mention MI6.
So if Tara wasn’t killed in the so-called car crash, what happened to him and how did he disappear? Did the cops and newspapers and coroner fake the story? If so, then we will mention MI6.
Kensington and Chelsea are in densely populated central London. Could anyone drive 120 mph through it, even if insane enough to try? Why would a traffic light make any difference, if you’re flying through streets at 120 mph? You couldn’t stop quickly at that speed anyway, so what’s the nonsense about the traffic light Tara, according to John's lyrics, didn’t notice?
The Daily Mail have Tara driving Suki home after dinner at a restaurant. The Beatles Bible article, Tara Dies, reports that they left a friend’s house just before 1:00 a.m. and they were “in search of food.” At 120 mph, they were looking for a restaurant open late? Really?
When Tara and Nicki separated, she moved to Spain. To me, it’s mildly interesting that Nicki and ‘John Lennon’ were both in Spain in 1966, for very different reasons, we suppose. Nicki moved to Spain to get away from Tara and John and Dick Lester and crew moved down there to shoot a movie. Just lots of folks moving to Spain temporarily in 1966.
Tara died of his injuries the following day. Suki was ‘unharmed’ (again, see video of 120 mph crash test). Wait, what’s not right? The Beatles Bible says Tara died of his injuries the following day. The third paragraph of the Daily Mail story says he was ‘killed instantly.’ If Suki had not been in the car at all during the beating it took, then it would make sense that she was unharmed that night. There isn’t a drop of blood to be seen in the photo the Daily Mail calls ‘horrific wreckage,’ so we’re to believe Tara was ‘killed instantly,’ but didn’t bleed.
Seriously, I don’t think anyone died in the bloodless car in that photo. It was parked and no one was in it when the damage occurred. If it wasn't mauled by a sledgehammer, maybe something big and heavy was dropped from above on it, but I think a sledgehammer made the gashes (and probably all the other damage).
Sorry for the digression, but oddly, this reminds me of a Peter Gabriel song...

you'd better call the sledgehammer put your mind at rest I'm going to be-the sledgehammer this can be my testimony I'm your sledgehammer
let there be no doubt about it
The Beatles Bible articles quote Lennon in Anthology recalling the two Daily Mail articles he saw that inspired him to write A Day In The Life. One was Tara’s crash and the other was about the holes in Blackburn, Lancashire. This is an odd quote, ‘One was about the Guinness heir who killed himself in a car.’ Tara was supposed to be a close friend of both Paul and John, so why doesn’t John say ‘our friend’ instead of distancing himself by saying ‘the Guinness heir’? Why does he say Tara ‘killed himself in a car,’ which sounds like suicide?
In the dubious Barry Miles bio of McCartney, ‘Paul’ says it was a politician who ‘blew his mind out in a car.’ A politician? Sir Paul says it was nothing to do with a crash, but it may have been to John, but they wrote the song together. What?
As in so many tales of Beatles lore and legend, the Tara Browne crash story is full of holes, just like Blackburn, Lancashire. The Albert Hall, coincidentally, is not far away from the so-called Tara Browne crash scene in South Kensington, which was most likely nothing but a faked, psyop event.
But don't ask me what really happened to Tara, Paul, John, George and Ringo before 1967. Probably dead, but how and why?