I Believe in Featles: John Lennon (Part 2)
Tina Foster
May 3, 2020
The body-build changed from brawny to scrawny.
The smoking gun: John Lennon's nipples were
lower on his chest than the impostor's were.
This article is a continuation of I believe in Featles: CIAlebrity impersonator, "John Lennon" (updated), which is about the impostor-replacement of Beatle John Lennon.
Cynthia Lennon, John Lennon's first wife, wrote in her book, A Twist of Lennon, “The years 1966-67 were tremendous years of mental and physical change for the Beatles.” Of course, it is well-documented now that Paul McCartney was impostor-replaced, but what about the others? After all, she did mention physical changes in all of them. This article will focus on John Lennon.
Most people probably do not want to entertain the possibility that John Lennon was also switched out. It is hard enough dealing with the fact that Paul McCartney was. However, there are enough red flags to make me suspect a Doppelgaenger for him, as well. Does he not deserve a careful examination of a possible impostor stepping into his Beatle Boots?
Some of the anamolies have been discussed in
I believe in Featles: CIAlebrity impersonator, "John Lennon." so there is no need to repeat them here.
Cynthia Lennon, in an interview with Mike Wallace on 60 Minutes, seemed to hint that John was replaced.
Mike Wallace: "Was he (John) writing music at this time? (late 1966 - 1967)"
Cynthia: "No. There was a period of great, great change in his life and he didn't know what direction it was going to take, but the direction was chosen for him, anyway."
...
Cynthia: "Seeing this man, who wasn't John anymore, doing the wildest things."
At another time, she said, “He was quite simply not the John I knew. It was as if he had taken on a different persona... It was hard to accept that they were the same person.” [Source]
Geoff Emerick, sound engineer for the Beatles, said that between the end of recording Revolver and the start of "Strawberry Fields Forever" - the span of a few months, Lennon lost all the baby fat on his face and was very thin. The quote is on page 133 of Here, There and Everywhere: "It had been five months since I had seen the group, but it might as well been five years. For one thing, they all looked so different. John was the one who had changed the most: having shed the excess weight he'd put on during Revolver sessions, he was trim, almost gaunt and he was wearing Granny glasses, not the thick horn rimmed National Health spectacles I was used to seeing."
In the following video, Geoff Emerick talks about screens they put up in the studio so that the Beatles could not be seen from the booth (at 16:00). At 23:20, he hints about Lennon being two different people:
Another oddity occurred when long-time friend of the band, Mal Evans, was killed. When his ashes were sent back to England, they were lost in the postal system. Upon learning of the lost remains, John Lennon reportedly quipped, "They should look in the dead letter file.” [Source] Would John really joke about his dead friend's remains being lost? This is even more callous than Faul McCartney stating that it was "a drag" when Lennon was shot. [Video of Faul responding to assassination]. Did "Lennon" even know Mal Evans? If not, then it would explain the lack of sorrow at his passing.
Another red flag are lapses in Lennon's memory regarding songs from the Beatle days. For example, Lennon claimed that the song, "Let It Be," had "nothing to do with The Beatles... It could've been Wings." [Source] Obviously, "Let It Be" WAS a Beatles' song, not a "Wings song." [Song facts]
In the Playboy interview with David Sheff in 1980, he admitted a general lack of knowledge regarding the songs.
Many people were incredulous that John Lennon would leave his beautiful wife (Cynthia Powell Lennon) and child (Julian Lennon) for Yoko Ono.
When Lennon met Yoko in the Fall of 1966, he seemed very co-dependent and refused to leave her side, which seemed out of character for John. He also adopted and promoted her causes. Perhaps he was being used as controlled opposition? Vladimir Lenin once said, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it.” Lennon became a "leader" of the anti-war movement. However, he and Yoko Ono pulled Monty Python-esque stunts (such as giving interviews in bags) that made peace activists look ridiculous. In this way, the whole peace movement could be discredited and not be taken seriously.
Lennon responded, "I'm sorry that you liked your old mop-tops and you thought I was very satirical and witty, but I’ve grown up."
Gloria Emerson replied, “You’ve made yourself ridiculous... you’re a fake (at 1:16).”
Is this a clue that this is not the real Beatle John?
The truth is, John loved his first wife, Cynthia. In the September 1966 issue of The Beatles Book Monthly, he stated that she was one of the few people he trusted implicitly. The reporter "asked if he trusted anybody implicitly." John responded, "Only the other three [Beatles], and my wife." [Source]
Larry Kane, who worked with Ron Howard on Eight Days a Week (and was close friends with John Lennon), quoted Beatles' press agent and friend, Tony Barrow, in his book, Lennon Revealed: “… most people have no idea what a central figure [Cynthia Lennon] was in terms of keeping [John] somewhat stable during that hard phase [before Beatlemania] when no one knew if the boys were a passing fad or the real thing… People forget what a rock she was for him.”Kane wrote further. “During my first travels with the Beatles in 1964, John was eager to talk about his family of three. When the subject turned to Cynthia, his eyes would sparkle and dance…" He also related this conversation:
Kane: “So have you been in touch with the people at home?”
Lennon: “I talk to Cyn almost every night.”
Kane: “What is she like?”
Lennon: “Well, she’s beautiful, y’know, and what people don’t know is how smart she is. No matter what’s happening, you know, she’s there for me.”
Another example of John's commitment to his first wife occurred in January 1964, when the Beatles were in Paris. The lads were given one day off to rest and relax. John took advantage of that day to fly home to London to be with Cynthia. He could have enjoyed a relaxing day in the City of Lights. Instead, John chose to go home to his wife. He also invited her to accompany him on the band’s first trip to America, despite Brian Epstein’s objections. John obviously wanted Cyn to share that experience with him.
John also made it publicly known that he was married (such as on The Ed Sullivan Show). When asked by the BBC on one occasion if he ever got tired of being a Beatle, John replied that he got tired of people saying he was going to get a divorce from his wife. This signaled his commitment to and intention of staying married to her.
Other indications of a Lennon double can be seen in the strange circumstances that surrounded the Lennon assassination, such as the attending doctor and nurse not recognizing the mortally wounded man as being John Lennon. This and more are discussed in Troubling questions remain regarding John Lennon's assassination.
The possibility that Lennon was shot by the doorman was mentioned, but a song by Yoko One, “Kiss Kiss,” apparently contains a sinister confession when played backwards. Ono whispers, “I shot John Lennon.”
Rick Martinez explained: "There are demonic voices embedded in the mix of a particular song, bragging about shooting and killing John. The odd thing is, I had this album when he was still alive. Kiss Kiss Kiss played backwards is (Hate God) [love] six six six. I discovered this back in 1980. Near the end of the song, after he says, “let’s take a chance and fly away somewhere”, there is silence, and then the drums kick back in. ( the 3:26 mark on this video) after this, you hear a type of moan, and voices buried in the mix can be heard. It’s hard to hear on here, I recommend headphones or earbuds. If you have this on vinyl or CD, adjust down the bass, and tweak the treble. You will clearly hear the words: “We killed John Lennon. We pulled the trigger.” I owned this album while John was still alive. Nobody went in after the fact and put this there. The voice sent chills down my spine, it sounds inhuman. It sounds like demons who no longer had any use for this man, so he was eliminated, and they brag about killing him on his own record. Being a song about starting over, and looking towards the future, seems all the more cruel."
Yoko Ono "I Shot John Lennon, after he was dead, I knew he was an Angel"seek 666" in back masked
At the LA press conference on August 28, 1966, John Lennon was asked about a statement he had made previously:
QUESTION: "Show Business is an extension of the Jewish religion. Would you mind amplifying that?"
QUESTION: "Show Business is an extension of the Jewish religion. Would you mind amplifying that?"
John Lennon:"I mean, you can read into it what you like. It's just a little old statement. I was not very serious about it."
QUESTION: "And those words, how did you piece them together?"
John Lennon obviously knew about the Zionist control of the music industry and show business at large. (For more information, see this article by Tex Marrs: Do The Jews Own Hollywood And The Media?) It seems at that point, he was trying to backtrack from the statement, perhaps so that he would not get into further trouble (as he did with his "bigger than Jesus" statement).
In the 1980 Playboy interview, Lennon said LSD set people free, but in reality, it is a mind control drug. Some think that this statement precipitated his assassination, but what if John had already been out of the picture? What if the double were simply being retired, and it was deemed better for him to go out in a "blaze of glory" that would be seared into the public consciousness? In that case, questioning the official story would be frowned upon, as it would be seen as disrespectful. However, one should consider the possibility that the assassination was staged. It is not so far-fetched considering that a CIA asset (Jose Perdomo) was the doorman, how Paul's double reacted so nonchalantly to the news (It was a "drag"), and how quickly the body was cremated against Lennon's wishes [Source]. The fact that there was no funeral or public viewing of the body also makes one wonder whether those close to him were trying to hide something. [Source]
For more information, see I believe in Featles: CIAlebrity impersonator, "John Lennon" (updated)
__________________________________________________
|
Tina Foster is the author of
Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.