Monday, February 17, 2014

A Very English 9/11 Mystery [Paul is Dead] - Nicholas Kollerstro​m


A Very English 9/11 Mystery

[Reposted with permission from the author, Nicholas Kollerstro​m [see original]
There is a very old conspiracy theory that seems to be resurfacing.  A couple of years ago,

batman

Ringo Starr was interviewedand said,  twice, that he was the last of the Beatles: ‘I am the last remaining Beatle.’  (26.5.11) The ‘Plastic Macca’website here is by Tina Foster: she was interviewed by Andrew Johnson on the topic, ‘Was Paul McCartney replaced in 1966?’ - here. 
Just last week, Jim Fetzer did atwo-hour interview with Clare Kuehn on the subject (‘the Real Deal with Jim Fetzer’), which is quite important, and you might want to peruse some of the four hundred comments about it here, probably the most informed debate on the topic yet. Some of you might remember Clare for the excellent lecture she gave at the Vancouver 911 truthconference in Toronto.
The ‘urban legend’ has Paul McCartney die in a sudden car-crash on a date defined by the drum on the Sargent Pepper album! We can read that as, 11-9- He Die (see below). When the Paul-is-dead stories started appearing (see Batman Marvel cover) in 1969, it was in America, so on most websites you will read the date of this urban-myth event as 11th of November – American dating: eg Here,  or here.

RIP_at_billyshears_com
But, hey, this happened in England, and 11-9 is September 11th, thank you! Clare added here that the Magical Mystery Tour started filming on 11th September 1967, one year later – starting at 10.15 am I might add; then on 11th September 1968 John Lennon recorded his surreal ‘Glass Onion’song where the Walrus is identified as Paul.
So this is a totally and authentically British 9/11 mystery, whose date was fixed in the last century! Numerologists will no doubt have something to say about 11-9-1966, but I’ll keep clear of that one. A mirror is held up to the drum to see it, which is something to reflect upon.
Notice the two experts we’ve quoted are both women – maybe some deep female intuition is needed to resolve this matter.
A couple of years ago, the book ‘The Memoirs of Billy Shears’ appeared, which is rather authentic-looking. It has the air of being written by Sir Paul himself, as if he late in life wished to put the record straight. I suspect that this may catalyse some debate. These Billy Shears books are expensive, as if wishing to price themselves out of the range of riff-raff like you and me – but, if any readers get hold of a copy, do please post a comment here! A friend has recently been showing me a copy.  Now that gives the date of September 11th for the car-crash. (See its Frequently Asked Questions): ‘Paul died late in the evening of September 11th, 1966.’ 

sgt-peppers-drum
The Billy Shears book is 666 pages long,  and written in the first person,as if the Walk-in Paul McCartney finally wants to set out the record, in his old age, eg which songs were his. It begins by saying that the young Paul M died, then came back againand lived in me, – as if some ultra-strange identity-transform took place. Through funny dreams he came to feel this soul-transfusion.  Was he an even better musician than the early young Paul? We’re talking here about supreme musical artistry, so let’s be careful what we say.
Let’s start by assuming that readers are totally sceptical – and even angry that such a mad idea is being mooted. To such
BillyShears

sceptics, I say: listen, here is the Problem – which requires explaining. The greatest band in musical history reaches the apogee of success – then suddenly it stops all public performances, in mid-1966. There is a kind of vacuum in late 1966, with the manager Brian Epstein having to put out a statement assuring everyone that Paul is OK. Only studio recordings after that. Their next big event is the Sgt. Pepper album, whose front cover is of a funeral -the ‘Beatles’ are being buried! The cover shows the old Beatles (in wax) all much the same height, then in the center the ‘new’ band with Paul conspicuously taller than the others: no amount of plastic surgery can alter this fact, that the new ‘Paul’ is a couple of inches taller.
His face is longer, his eyes are green, see images below (the old Paul had brown eyes), he’s taller, he was right-handed but taught himself to play left-handed, his hair parts from left to right, vice-versa for the original Paul, he’s got a thinner nose and his teeth are different – which cannot readily be adjusted by surgery.
The album claims it is the ‘Lonely Hearts Club band’ – it does not introduce itself as the Beatles, and introduces the new member ‘Billy Shears,’ who is he? It has a lot of ‘psychedelic’ texture alteration so we cannot note any slight changes in playing or voice. This might remind you of the album released at the end of ’66 Beatles Oldies which has a tall, slim character depicted on its cover,who is said to be the new band-member as he originally looked, before all the surgery adjusted him! That album is said to be the first on which the new ‘Paul’ played (Again, I’m quoting from the Billy Shears site here).
sgt-pepper
The yellow flowers at the bottom of the Sgt Pepper cover are supposed to show Paul’s left-handed guitar, and also to show the letters ‘PAUL?’ Its meant to have just three guitar strings on it, as only three Beatles are left.
People tell me that the stress of screaming fans was too much for the Beatles, so they broke up. I don’t buy that one. Artists live for the interaction with an audience, not just to record in studios. The Stones didn’t just wimp out because their audiences were over-enthusiastic.  Then, Lennon starts composing weirdly airy-fairy music, and again people say that was the LSD, but I don’t reckon that’s quite enough. Here for example is fromGlass Onion, and I’d say this is Lennon contemplating the Great Beyond where his closest, best friend and songwriter has now gone:
I told you ’bout strawberry fields
You know the place where nothing is real
Well, here’s another place you can go
Where everything flows
Looking through the bent backed tulips
To see how the other half live
Looking through a glass onion
I told you ’bout the walrus and me, man
You know that we’re as close as can be, man
Well, here’s another clue for you all
The walrus was Paul.
The green eyes of the new ‘Paul’ were first clearly shown to the world in the filmStrawberry Fields Forever - as the voice-over sings, ‘Nothing is real.’ (Here, at nine minutes)
So I would say that is an extremely weird sequence of events whereby the world’s most famous band dissolved itself. It requires explaining. It is never going to make sense if the same four lads were playing throughout.
John Lennon – musician extraordinaire, truthteller, master of enchantment, whose words expressed the optimistic hope of our generation – why did he divorce his lovely wife, leave his native country, leave his band, and go to do absolutely nothing for ten years in New York? He did it to get as far away as he could from the pain.
Sir Paul (we’ll call him that, for even before he was knighted, the band called him ‘Faul’) did not attend the funeral of the father of Paul McCartney, 1976.

Paul_mcCartney_faul


After thatpaul_faul-1Eyebrowsandeyes
The ‘real’ Paul McCartney is on the left in these comparisons (Thanks Tina Foster from Plastic Macca site).
On ‘Abbey Road’, ‘Paul’ sings of a sinister MI5 or MI6 agent hanging around: Maxwell’s Silver Hammer and he has a license to kill – after this great and mysterious event happened, the band and their women were not at liberty to step out of line. The Beatles were national revenue.
The last-ever sighting of the real Paul seems to be on 29th August, on their return from the american tour. He then vanishes completely until 24th November-when the group turns up at the EMI office – with the New Paul. Here we see the first-ever pic of the New Paul, ‘Faul’ in the UK.

 1st ever picof Faul in UK
After years of detailed chronology, day by day, Paul simply has no history THE ENTIRE MONTH of October, 1966. On October 3rd the Manager Brian Epstein puts out an astounding press-release, that The Beatles would never perform on stage to live audience again. (some sources give October 13th – Beatle bios become incredibly vague in the aftermath of the last concert) In October-November, Beatles bodyguard Mal Evans strangely travels from France, Spain, and Kenya with Faul on “a jungle safari”. The new Faul appears in a newspaper on 10th December. On that day, the Oldies album was released, having on its back a group photo with the real Paul in shirt colored in black – first ‘death’ clue. On 20th December came Faul’s first on-camera appearance, tightly guarded, and ushered off soon. Next May he discards that moustache – the scars of surgery having healed up enough – and by the summer is looking quite cheerful! He should do, it was the Summer of Love and Peace…
Much later on, film by Mal Evans of Faul in Kenya in November ’66 was released (Here, at 3-4 minutes), which has to be the first ever footage of ‘him’. Nobody could mistake this stranger for the real Paul McCartney. So who the hell was he? Where had this awesome musical genius just come from? This is quite a deep Shakespearan enigma, which you or I are not going to solve in a hurry. But, post here if you know the answer! Remember, whoever he had been, would have to have just ‘died,’ and preferably be buried.*
To make that 3rd October announcement, Brian Epstein had to struggle out from his recuperation clinic, having been hospitalised the month before due to a drug overdose. His bio attributes this to some stress in a gay relationship, but I’m not in a hurry to accept that.
These events reinforce our interpretation of 11th September as the Date, and rules out the widely-cited 9th November date. The announcement that they would never perform live again, reinforces the case for catastrophic death.
Ear Job
Massive ear change
The image on the left is ‘Faul’ in Kenya in October-November ’66. That on the right is the shy young man who made his debut in late November, then with the Fab Four gave an interview on 20th December. We here see one further step in his Beatle-isation, an ear-adjustment.
…………………………….
Heather Mills after her divorce from Sir Paul was asked, “Knowing what you know now about Paul, would you have married him in the first place?”  “Never,” Heather said firmly. She added that there was ‘ A lot of fear of the truth coming out from a certain party.’ It was ‘beyond belief’ and she did not mean infidelity – no wonder the press were mystified.
Sir Paul’s sons don’t at all resemble him, as may remind us of all the surgery that has gone into his face. He is normally photographed with his mouth open, as it can look a bit strange when closed, a residue of the surgery, long ago.
Sir Paul in an interview gave an unconvincing reply, as to why he had not been wearing any shoes while crossing Abbey Road on the album cover. Then he was asked about the identity-swap: ‘The idea was, that there was a very good double taking his [Paul's] place’, and he replies, ‘No well, this is him‘ pointing to himself – taken literally, he has just replied, that he is the double! After that you can see him looking a bit phased, by what has just come out. ‘Or is it?’ asks the interviewer, looking straight at us.
Here is the mature Sir Paul, making a certain well-known sign.
satanic sign
3 candles

Mal Evans reportedly died in 1977 in a LA flat shot by mistake, cremated and his ashes lost in the post - like some John Lennon comic story.
Nice Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdLF1w8NB-k
Books:  Gary Patterson, The Walrus Was Paul 1998 * Doctor Lev, Billy Shears  The Secret History of the Beatles 2002 * Forrest Daily,  The Fifth Magician, The great Beatles Impostor Story 2003 * Thomas E Uharriet,    Billy’s Back! The Memoirs of Billy Shears2009.
_______________________________


The Luciferian Deception

ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth



19 comments:

  1. I spent all evening reading the 422 comments on the Fetzer blog while listening to the Fetzer/Kuehn discussion. PID is such a fascinating subject that when I ignore it for months, I still can't escape it and find myself drawn right back into it like an iron filament to a magnet.

    This parallels my life long interest in The Beatles' music, the four as people, and my habit of reading everything I can get my hands on about them. Then there are the YouTube PID videos. I've watched hundreds and subscribe to the coolest channels whether inactive or active. Lately, I've been posting as continentalgin, but Tina also knows me as Switching Yard.

    I admire Tina and Getsmart --- they 'turned me' to the PID side using photographic and film evidence and plain logic. Also, when I got into it (on abovetopsecret.com), I saw obvious trolls and shills attacking Tina, Getsmart and myself and then I was convinced that PID must be true. If something is nonsense and poses no threat to 'the official story', trolls and shills don't bother. But if you hit the nail on the head, they come after you on the discussion boards with any and all manner of derailment, subterfuge and 'fog of war' --- and these, one would suspect paid, trolls are still watching, listening and reading the state-of-the-art of PID research and still trying to hammer PID out of existence.

    Clare did an excellent job on the podcast and blog, really holding her own well against the counterattacks. I tend to agree more with Tina that a new set of fab four emerged with Sgt. Pepper and that the Early Years Beatles didn't live past the year 1966. Brian and Mal were knocked off because they knew too much. I'm more interested in the 'why' of it all than I am in the details of the photo comparisons. To me, I am over examining photos. It is more than obvious to me that we are seeing different men, not at all the same Paul (nor John, as I see it). But it's silly anyway, because not only do the photos and films very plainly prove we are looking at different Pauls, the personalities are very, very different and in addition, there are noticeable differences, to my ears, in the speaking, singing, bass playing, and songwriting of the pre-1966 and post-1966 Paul.

    I have no doubt that Paul was replaced and logically, I believe, he was killed. Contrary to Clare Kuehn (whom I admire), I think all The Beatles were killed and replaced. Candlestick Park was the first live concert of the 'new' Beatles, then when it was obvious they weren't going to be any good in concert, Sgt. Pepper began their studio period where all the magic(k) happened behind closed doors. Their second and last live concert was on the studio rooftop.

    So I don't need to revisit the nitty gritty photo comparison details or the Italian Wired or the well worn clues like 'Officially Pronounced Dead' or the barefoot walk or Letterman or any of the stuff I've seen and considered many times. I've gone beyond needing evidence that it happened. Now, I am looking at the 'why' and although I have not been 100% persuaded yet, I am considering that there may have been multiple Beatles (working doubles) going all the way back to The Beatles signing with Brian and EMI. I vacillate between being sure of it and not sure of it, so I am really not 100% persuaded that The Beatles was a psy-op from 1962-63 onward. I know with certainty it was a psy-op from 1967 onward just from the mountain of circumstantial evidence. I would also like to understand the 'why' of the Crowley influence.

    The search for truth continues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Switching Yard!
      I'm Essence from All My Loving. Just wanted to say "yes" to everything you said about all the original Beatles replaced, and The Beatles being a complicated psyop since Epstein/EMI times (without the Lads being fully aware of it of course). You are absolutely right saying that without thinking of WHY they were replaced we'll never have a chance to find the truth. If you know people who are coming close to this level of awareness about the subject and went beyond PID, please invite them to register at All My Loving. Your recommendation will be enough to approve them, as you are a member.

      With great respect,
      Essence

      Delete
    2. I have some new grist for your mill, Lewis Carroll (assuming you're still around): were there more than one Fauls? If so, which was which and when and, of course, who?

      Delete
  2. Excellent! Maybe the best short summary I've seen yet of PID--that is to say, of one of the central and most crucial conundrums of our time, right there alongside the moon landing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you!

      What many people who criticize PID research, the ones who say "it was only a band" or "what's the big deal, Paul is only an entertainer" --- what they fail to realize is that this is the biggest fraud, the biggest con, perpetrated on the people of the world in modern times and in addition, there are strong reasons to suspect that murder, assassination, and threats of murder have taken place from the time this cover-up was initiated to the present day, as well as other related crimes. These are serious crimes by any standard.

      So, when people try to brush this off as a worthless and nonsensical conspiracy theory, they are simply being ignorant of the massive amount of data-points collected by many serious PID researchers over the years. Martin Heurlin, who is the strongest candidate for being the real iamaphoney, supposed creator of the superb Rotten Apple series on YouTube, has reportedly been the victim of arson. I mention that as an example of how dangerous the topic of PID can be to researchers exposing details of the cover-up. Heather Mills did and perhaps still does fear for her life because of what she knows about Faul.

      Also, PID (I use this as an umbrella term which includes PWR, although I am aware that PWR considers that here may not have been a death of Paul) is a research 'movement' that is far from over. Anyone who thinks all of the clues have been discovered and that we are at a dead end (pun intended) are in for some shocks in the future because I believe that we in the research community will continue to find new connections and new understanding of what happened or what could have happened. Clues were definitely planted and it is quite short-sighted to presume that all of them have been found and interpreted. There is certainly more to come in our ever evolving PID research. Much is yet to be discovered, a wide range of forensic procedures have yet to be done, and we continue to separate 'the wheat from the chaff' as we researchers pursue this very important topic --- PID.

      Delete
    2. Right on all counts. Lest my remark about the moon landing was construed by any as facetious, what I meant was that the rise of the Beatles, with all that group's enormous cultural influence, and the supposed moon landing, both of which have played huge parts in the making of the current Zeitgeist (the common noun, not the film-and-movement package deal), also both have surrounding them the same sorts of nagging, problematic aspects that might be taken as suggesting some measure of artifice or sleight of hand. You've covered in a short space some of the most convincing evidence to date. Those who have not previously explored this area might look into Dave McGowan's forthcoming Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon (heretofore the Inside the LC columns), together with Kent Hartman's The Wrecking Crew. Youtube channels like Iamaphoney, 999Nowhereman, and Beacon1966 also have some intriguing materials.

      Delete
    3. I have not sthe NWO. n any evidence of the Wrecking Crew had nothing anything to do with either PID or any psyop whatsoever. If you have any evidence I'd like to see it. The Wrecking Crew were just studio musicians paid to play, they were given sheet music or created the arrangements themselves with no agenda to hurt anyone or help th

      Delete
    4. Agreed. But a familiarity with the Wrecking Crew may help fans or spectators of modern culture to see daylight between our popular music stars and the actual product itself, the music--surely a big help in the area of PID research. Is Faul's apparent virtuosity as a composer and performer really so overwhelming a refutation of PID?
      Come to think of it, some research into the Milli Vanilli affair might also prove edifying...

      Delete
  3. Also, I didn't see it mentioned in this article, but I'm fairly certain that Clare Keuhn and Nick Kollerstrom are supposed to be doing a show on PID on Jim Fetzer's radio show tomorrow Wed. 2/19/14. His radio show gets posted here http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/ a couple of days after the show is aired. And in the upper right hand corner, there's a link to Revere Radio, where you can listen live at 5pm cst

    ReplyDelete
  4. Note as well the John Lennon on the Sgt. Pepper album is no way the original John Lennon.

    From this period forward the Beatles only dressed in costumes vs clothes and always seem to disguise their looks with facial hair, glasses and transcendental gibberish.

    Real Paul was filmed again in his Scotland farm in October of 69 but that was the last. I am sure he was pissed he had to vacate the farm and give it up to Faul and the wench for Life magazine and forever.

    Still don't think he died or was killed, still think he walked away from it all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. I'm convinced that the new "John" was in the Dick Lester film shoot in Spain. I don't know who wrote the music, sang, or appeared on the album cover of Sgt. Pepper. The person looks different and has a different personality (in film footage from that period) than the early period Beatle John, IMHO. Who he is (or they), I have no idea.

      Delete
    2. I'm intrigued by your statement that the real Paul was seen in Scotland, then walked away from it all and was not killed. What film are photos of the real Paul are you referring to --- do you mean the footage at the farm when the reporters drive up, he seems angry and nervous and says, "Now don't start talkin' about that or you might get in trouble."? Is that the encounter you mean, or is there a different one and do you have a link or URL?

      Delete
    3. To clarify, I'm not agreeing that Paul didn't get killed, I'm agreeing that John didn't appear on the Sgt. Pepper album cover or any photos/films from the Sgt. Pepper period. But I would like to see what compelling circumstantial evidence you might have to back your theory that the real Paul survived the fall of 1966. My opinion is he died in 1966, unless I see some new evidence.

      Delete
  5. I like the photo comparisons above. This one is such a give away.

    http://terroronthetube.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Eyebrowsandeyes.jpg

    The difference between the eyebrows, nose and eye color. What more does the public need?

    Also, when I think about this obvious body double replacement situation I feel horrified that someone could take the place of someone else and trade their life in for another.

    This is so far from normal I can't comprehend the mindset .

    ReplyDelete
  6. I am new to this, and I am quite over the basic clues myself--I honestly do realize Paul was replaced, probably on 9-11-66--that's a highly occult-beloved date--some Christians scholars now think Jesus was actually born on that date--what better date for Satanists to desecrate than that one?--the 'new' Beatles, aka Sgt. Pepper's, starting their projects from 1967 onward on that date also points the way to who and what's behind it all, I'm convinced of that--also, in some videos I've seen that are trying to show that there is something very fishy about things surrounding Paul, a Blue Bird is flashed onto the screen--Blue Bird was a vile, illegal, unethical project involving creating multiple personalities in it's victims--what is involved in accomplishing that is so criminal, those responsible for it should be spending the rest of their lives in jail--in my twenties I had experienced tremendous trauma, and the multiple-sectioned-off mental condition happened to me because of it--it happened in order to help protect me from memories of what occurred that I could not deal with--with work, those mental protective barriers came down, but it took lots of time, and work, on my part--unfortunately, or fortunately, some Psychiatrists, at one point, thought I was one of the victims of Blue Bird--once they realized their mistake, their diagnosis of my condition was that I was 'just lonely' and 'in need of attention'--in essence they decided I was pretending!--nope, I was not, but I will not forget that they mistook me for one of the victims of Blue Bird, and now I know why--this whole thing is so satanic in nature, that those behind it are referred to as TPTB--The Powers That Be--hiding sometimes in plain site, themselves, but now becoming bolder since they are realizing their 'time to shine' is on the horizon--their goal--to enthrone the one they love as ruler of this world--sounds nutty, I know--but, the devil horns symbols flashed by everyone from John Lennon to George Bush, and his wife, should be a clue--I was hoping, when I first began looking into this, that I would find out that it was a silly publicity stunt--when it happened I immediately dismissed it all as just that, never ever thinking for one second it could be true--but, as soon as I began looking into this two weeks ago, I was completely shocked to realize it IS true--what's happened to Paul I have no idea, but I am so glad that Claire Kuehn is doing such a completely forensic investigation, as well as keeping it all in lawyer-like order and perspective, as though she is preparing a case for court--which I hope finally happened, with those involved dragged in to face the music--pun intended here.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well, here's another clue for you all... the smiling angel was Faul: http://i.imgur.com/Caqwt6f.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  8. First of all, allow me to begin by saying that I like your blog. It is one of the better written 'studies' on the subject. As a fairly broadminded individual, I am willing to entertain the notion that it is possible that the 'real' Paul McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced by a double. After all, it was nearly fifty years ago, and a feat - nigh on impossible by today's standards; what with 24/7rolling media coverage/celeb stalking by tabloid internet sites, etc - such as the non disclosure and subsequent cover up of the death of a key member of - what was then - the world's most popular band is not beyond the realms of possibility given the times. Personally, I am not a Beatles fan. Granted, there are a couple of songs which are quite catchy, but all in all, I can take them or leave them. I do have a family member, however, who completely adores them and has seen 'Faul' play live on more than one occasion. My family member refuse to entertain the idea that there was ever a cover up and frequently pokes fun at the conspiracy theorists. Now, as I said, I am more broad minded. I am not convinced of the theory - especially when it is put together with other, more bizarre, theories i.e. 'clones', 'reptilian bloodlines', and - God help us - the 'illuminati', all of which I discount out of hand as the highly impossible, baseless, demented ravings of those who have nothing better to do with their time. As long as PID is associated with such outlandish theories, it will never be given proper consideration in the mainstream, but dismissed as yet another crackpot yarn, as rational minded people will tune out the second they hear the words 'clone' 'illuminati' and 'reptilian shapeshifter'. The association with the aforementioned serves only to discredit that which could very well be a fact. Now, I like to stick as close as possible to, what I believe, is the most likely theory, without straying into the world of fantasy and science fiction. To me - and this is just my opinion, and I am not seeking to rubbish the opinions of believers - I can see very little difference, save the natural effects of aging - and perhaps some ill judged plastic surgery - between the Paul McCartney pre 1966 and the Paul McCartney of today. However, should proper evidence ever come to light - and I don't mean the amateur photo composites we see online (as a professional digital artist, I am well aware of the rules of photo manipulation and composition, and most of the 'photographic evidence' I see online, falls short of the mark, as the photos being compared are often of poor or disparate quality, taken at different angles and height and with varying degrees of exposure, etc ) Having said that, I will keep an open mind on the subject and look forward to your updates. Love and blessings. :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Interesting to find The Billy Shears book is 666 pages long and that this author puts JPM's death at 9 11 66.
    A well thought and researched peace of work

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.