Saturday, June 18, 2011

Rock Gods: Were the Beatles Angels?



Today, June 18, 2011, would have been Paul McCartney's 69th birthday. In honor of that occasion, I would like to indulge in some wild speculation as to whether he and the other Beatles were angels.


Timothy Leary once declared "that The Beatles [were] Prototypes of evolutionary agents sent by God, endowed with a mysterious power to create a new human species, a young race of laughing freemen." (As quoted in Shout! (1981) by Philip Norman, p. 365; and in An Encyclopedia of Quotations about Music (1981) by Nat Shapiro, p. 303 [Link])

The Maharishi Mahesh Yogi told "George and Deepak Chopra that he could never be upset at the Beatles because he always knew they were angels on earth."

[Source:
Beatles: Angels on Earth?]
The photographer of some unpublished photos of the Beatles also noted something special about the Pre-Fab Four: "I knew they were going to be successful because they had an aura, and months later they were world famous..."

[Source: "
The Beatles new release: Unpublished pictures to go on display after they sat in an attic for 50 years"][Please support this blog by clicking on our sponsors' ad ~ Thanks!]

Charles Manson also believed the Beatles were angels, and that Revolution 9 from the White Album was a reference to the Holy Bible’s Revelations 9:

Revelations 9
From the Holy Bible

And in those days men shall seek death, and shall not find it; and
shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.

And the shapes of the locusts like unto horses prepared unto battle;

And on their heads as it were crowns like gold, and their faces as the faces of men.
And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as of lions.

And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their
wings was like the thundering of many horses and chariots rushing into battle.

And they had tails like unto scorpions, with stingers; with their
tails they had power to harm people for five months.

The locusts = The locusts can be an interpretation of insects, bugs or maybe beetles. The Beatles

Faces of men = The Beatles being men had faces of men.
As the hair of women = The Beatles had faces of men and the hair of women. Very original and unique to them for a time.

Breastplates of iron = their guitars with metal strings strapped to their chests
Sound like thundering horses and chariots rushing into battle = the sound of The Beatle’s loud amplified music.

Their tails they had power = The Beatles’ amplifiers had electric chords,
power chords= This is interesting in that the tails were not described as having venom or poison but instead “power.”
[Source: The Lennon Prophecy: A New Examination of the Death Clues of the Beatles]



In this back-masking done by Sunssol, it appears that the Beatles reject money, and seek peace and passion:


I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie

Ah...real tickets without peace
Ah, ah, ah, real tickets without peace
Ah, real tickets without peace...so
Here we burn and no peace
We now can reverse, now reversed
Ah...real tickets without peace
Ah, ah, ah, real tickets without peace
Ah, real tickets without peace...so
Heaven will watch it and we will all suffer
We now can reverse, now reversed...we will
We then have passion
At 6:20, this back-masking reveals "Paul is hare Krishna."


Krishna was the 8th incarnation of Vishnu.

...Saturn, the ascendant lord, acts as the Vishnu planet...
So it is clear that Saturn is representing Vishnu...
[Source: ]http://www.osfa.org.uk/pt.htm


George wrote "Gopala Krishna," which was never released:


It is said that "[B]irds often symbolize the divine. They are often viewed as gods in disguise, or else they are the vehicles of gods and goddesses..."

[Source: Swan at http://www.khandro.net/animal_bird_swan.htm]

In Faul's video for the song, "This One," reference seems to be made to such an entity:


On the cover of Sgt. Pepper, is Faul trying to make a connection between himself and Vishnu/Krishna?



Terry Knight sang in "St. Paul":

"I think there's something wrong
It's taking you too long to change the world
Sir Isaac Newton told you it would fall."


Does this mean that Paul was supposed to change the world for the better but was thwarted by being replaced by someone who played for the "other team?"

David Icke forum member, Jo_6, made this observation:
...The original Beatles were a massive force for the light!
They were laughing lovely men who gave you a warm feeling inside, wrote ace music and obviously thoroughly enjoyed performing it live. I believe they were a massive force of goodness and love, with like an etheric gold shining energy coming from them.
The dark controlling forces do not let this be when it occurs in a way that effects the masses. (Look at JFK and Bob Marley). They do not want Light forces of truth and goodness to effect the masses and lift us up and wake us up. So they stamp on it and suppress it, snuff it out, nip it in the bud. And , perhaps this is what happened to the Beatles. They were a massive force that effected the masses, and they weren't going to 'co-operate' with the dark controlling forces...so they were took out. And to carry on with the juggernaut powerboat that was the Beatles, to keep cashing in and using them as a tool to manipulate the masses, they were replaced. Anyone close was bought off, or threatened, scared into submission...
[Source: David Icke Forum link]

Philip Norman, author of "Shout!," referred to the Beatles as "supernatural" in an interview at the beginning of this video:


These are all questions with no easy answers. They are interesting to ruminate and speculate upon, however.




The Luciferian Deception

ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth


Sunday, May 22, 2011

Ringo: "I am the last remaining Beatle." Repeat: "I am the last remaining Beatle."


Mop-Top Paul (left) vs. Faul (right)

In this article excerpted below, Ringo Starr claims to be the last remaining Beatle. It is played off as a "joke," but even Ringo admits there is an "element of truth to it." As followers of this blog know, it has been proven by forensic evidence that Paul McCartney was replaced circa 1966.

How many hints do these people need to drop before people start thinking *maybe* there is something to PID? It was stated that Ringo was the last remaining Beatle not once, but *twice* in the same article - just in case you didn't catch it the first time. Please, read between the lines! They are not going to just tell you Paul was replaced.


‘You all know that the only person round this table who can go is me. I was in the biggest rock ’n’ roll band in the history of music… I am the last remaining Beatle.’ ...

The best jokes are based on truth...

‘There is an element of truth in it,’ Ringo says, before pausing for thought.

‘But I think it’s people on the outside who perceive Paul as thinking he’s the only one left. Actually, it’s me. I am the last remaining Beatle.’ ...

[M]aybe Ringo is the one who has stayed closest to the original spirit of the Beatles...
__________________________________________________








The Luciferian Deception

ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth



Friday, May 20, 2011

Troll hacked Tina's email - sending hateful emails


I received this email from someone today who received an email from a hacker using my email account. I want to assure everyone that I am not sending anyone hateful or threatening emails. I strongly suspect the perpetrator is Kathryn O'Connor, located in Detroit, Michigan. Here is the text of the email:
Hello, I decided to message you because at first I was just going to sent you back a message saying f-off, but then realized that some ill little troll must have just hijacked your credentials and used your basic info to email me and several other people of my site. Do you know anyone in or around the Detroit area with IPs of 71.205.174.11 & 71.205.170.49 and another with some kinf of store/business IP that wants to harass you by using your email to send hateful messages? If you have your own forum you should alert your members that whoever this weirdo is, has been using your email and trying to threaten (through you) a member of mine... Please tell people that [she] is not any of those things! And that the weirdo using your email is using IPs based around the Detroit area and coming from a store computer. Probably to mask their real identity.
If you have received an email ostensibly from me that is hateful or threatening, then it is from the hacker, and not from me. I have now reset my password to prevent further hack attacks. If you have received one of these emails, please do not be afraid to email me so that I can set it straight. Thanks!
Tina Foster
Paul is Dead Miss Him Forum
*******
I received an update about the hack attack (5/21/2011):
I did some investigating on that other IP. It's public, and available right here, as the IP trace showed very easily. 76.241.189.105 IP Address: 76.241.189.105 Host: adsl-76-241-189-105.dsl.sfldmi.sbcglobal.net Location: US, United States City: Leonard, MI 48367 Organization: SBC Internet Services ISP: SBC Internet Services Tracerouting showing as a naturalfoodpatch.com And a web addresshttp://www.naturalfoodpatch.com/ The other 2 IP links are from a comcast connection...

I looked further into it, the store owner's name is JJ...
*******
"Kitty"
Update 5/26/2011: Another person who got a hate-email from my account that Kathryn hacked into emailed me today to say that she thought Kathryn had help hacking the account. This person told me about a forum where Kathryn's victims can commiserate about their stalking and harassment experiences.  Apparently, they call her "Misery." The board dates back to at least 2007, so Kathryn has been at it for a while. Sadly, Kathryn got into the board once through a proboards glitch and harvested the email addresses, but the glitch has been fixed since. 
Private Support Group for Survivors of Stalking

This is the same troll who asked members of the hak5 forum to help her hack into the Paul is Dead Miss Him forum and take it down [see post from Dec. 2010].

__________________________________________________
The Luciferian Deception
ALIEN INVASION: Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth


Sunday, May 1, 2011

Is it McCartney or is it an imposter? By DAVID BRINN


 Paul McCartney vs. Faul

Repost of a Jerusalem Post PID article from 2008...


Sep 24, 2008 10:05 | Updated Sep 25, 2008 12:22

Is it McCartney or is it an imposter?



Some 40,000 fans are expected to pack Yarkon Park Thursday night to see Paul McCartney perform his classic songs. But will it really be the former Beatle taking the stage, or will it be Billy Shears? Or maybe William Campbell?

Some 40 years after first surfacing, the legend that the former Beatle died in a fiery 1966 car accident and was subsequently replaced by a look-alike, sound-alike imposter still attracts considerable attention and scrutiny. Books, research articles, Web sites, university lectures and presentations have all focused on the plethora of clues that weave together one of the more outlandish but mystifying conspiracy theories that evolved from the 1960s.

"At the time, people took it very seriously," recalled the "dean" of "Paul-is-dead" theorists, retired Delaware high school teacher Joel Glazier.


"It was the end of the '60s. You have to remember this was against the backdrop of the assassinations of Martin Luther King [Jr.] and Bobby Kennedy, as well as the Vietnam War and the Pentagon Papers. So this sounded like the perfect conspiracy cover-up. People stayed up all night talking about it, and some were actually quite scared."


lazier spoke to The Jerusalem Post from Toronto, where he was a featured speaker at a Beatles convention, along with former John Lennon girlfriend May Pang and ex-Ringo Starr paramour Nancy Andrews.


Glazier initially rose to prominence in the Beatles scholarly world in 1979 by publishing a 30-page comprehensive research article on the issue for the premier Beatles fan magazine, Strawberry Fields Forever, which attracted the attention of Beatles convention organizers.


Since then, Glazier has been a mainstay on the convention and college campus circuit, both in the US and Europe. But he's not just a conspiracy theorist - he's also a bona fide Beatles expert, and has been hired by the Delaware school system to present lectures to students on the importance of The Fab Four in popular culture.


For those too young - or too old - to remember the "Paul is dead" theory, it goes something like this: McCartney perished in a 1966 London car crash, but The Beatles, not wanting to make it public, used their clout to keep the tragedy secret. They hired the winner of a McCartney look-alike contest to take his place in the band, a lucky guy with the name of either William Shears Campbell, Billy Shears (the name of the fictitious leader of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band) or William Sheppard.


What gave fuel to the fire were a slew of supposed hints to the switcheroo that fans gleaned from Beatles' lyrics, photos and album covers, first exposed in a college newspaper article and then picked up by a Detroit radio station, before breaking worldwide with extensive coverage on all major TV and print media.

"I think you have to pay tribute to the cover of Abbey Road for starting it all," said Glazier. "The four Beatles are walking across the street, in what looks like could be a funeral procession. John's in white, the religious leader, Ringo's in a tux - the funeral director, George is in work jeans, the grave digger. And Paul, he's barefoot and out of the step with the others. People interpreted that as alluding to the practice of burying people barefoot.

"In addition, he's holding a cigarette in his right hand, and he was famous for being a left-handed bass player, a sign that this Paul is an imposter. And finally, there's the license plate on the Volkswagen in the background - which reads LMW 28-IF, which was interpreted to mean 'Linda McCartney widow, and Paul would have been 28 'if' he hadn't died in 1966."


From there, fans went backwards to albums like 1967's Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, which they claim houses a dozen more clues within the photo imagery on the front and back covers - including the back cover photo of the group with three of the Beatles facing forward and McCartney turned backward, with the words "Without you" printed next to his head from the song title "Within You Without You."


The cover of 1968's The Magical Tour shows three Beatles sporting red roses on their lapels, while McCartney's is black; and of course, Lennon supposedly sings "I buried Paul" at the end of "Strawberry Fields Forever."


And the list goes on - seemingly random details that, when combined together, might result in something more meaningful, according to Glazier.


"It certainly wasn't serendipity. Even if somebody could explain away one or two of the clues, how can you explain 70 of them? There were no coincidences when it came to The Beatles - everything was a precise, conscious decision, from the music to the album art," said Glazier, who discusses the phenomenon with a coyness of someone who loves keeping the legend alive.


He pointed to other chronological occurrences which he says provide additional ammunition of an upheaval in the Beatles world, as caused by McCartney's death.


"During 1967, when Sgt. Pepper's came out, The Beatles stopped performing live because the new Paul wasn't up to playing in public. And by 1970, the band had conveniently broken up and no longer had to deal with the questions. And some would say that since The Beatles years, the quality of Paul's songwriting is not what it once was. But that's a judgment call," said Glazier.


But according to Israeli Beatles historian Yarden Uriel, Hebrew author of two books on the group, the "Paul is dead" theorists are simply forgetting the main argument against acceptance of an imposter McCartney - human nature.

"Just because they were The Beatles, it doesn't mean that they don't behave in the same way that real people do, and that they interact with people in the same way as we do," said Uriel.

"Let's assume for a minute that Paul really did die and was replaced by a look-alike. The Beatles were very strong people individually - John, George and even Ringo.


"Do you think they would let this new guy come in and dominate the band, as Paul did on Sgt. Pepper's and all the way to Abbey Road and Let it Be?It's human nature that he would be relegated to the back and Lennon would take over the band. It's just not plausible. But people want to believe it because they like conspiracies. It's a great sociological study."


(Continued from page 1 of 2 )



For Glazier, though, it's been something more - a 40-year obsession. He won't profess whether he thinks McCartney is really dead. "I don't really know if Paul is dead or not. I'm too busy looking for clues."

But in addition to the popular conclusions that the clues were a hoax instigated by The Beatles either as a elaborate joke or to boost album sales, both of which have been denied by all four Beatles in the past, Glazier does offer some additional reasons as to why The Beatles may have initiated an intricate trail of "Paul is dead" clues.


"One of the theories is that the clues were introduced by The Beatles as a kind of tribute to their original bass player Stu Sutcliffe, who left them before they became popular," he said.


Another theory says that Lennon's love of wordplay and studio editing led to some clues in later albums, but that after cult leader Charles Manson attributed his killing spree in part to "hidden messages" in the song "Helter Skelter," the band members chose not to reveal the joke.


And then, going to the extreme, there are conspiracies that tie in everything from a Faustian deal with Satan to a Rosemary's Baby-Mia Farrow-Roman Polansky-Sharon Tate-Manson connection.


However, Glazier prefers to focus on the clues more than the reasons they might have been devised. And even more than the clues, he prefers to focus on The Beatles as a cultural phenomenon and revels in his Beatle fanhood.


Having visited Israel eight times, and being instrumental in the establishment of the John Lennon Peace Forest in the Galilee, Glazier is overjoyed that a Beatle is finally appearing in Israel. "Finally, the people of Israel will get to see the person who is allegedly Paul. And make sure you write 'he said that with a smile,'" said Glazier.


I think this is a wonderful thing for Israel, and for Paul. I've always found a sophisticated musical audience there and Paul, being the most successful musician in the world, should be playing there."


Glazier was one of the 250,000 fans who enjoyed McCartney's performance in July for Quebec's 400th anniversary and he said the Tel Aviv crowd would not be disappointed.


"It was an absolutely dynamic concert. I couldn't believe that somebody who's supposed to be 66 has such energy. And I also couldn't believe the quality of the sound, no matter where you stood, and the crystal clear big screens. I never saw so much detail given to those elements," said Glazier.


However, he can't help concluding by introducing another shadow of a doubt.

"Whoever this person is, he can certainly play well. But I still think there's something missing. Is that voice singing 'Yesterday' the same voice that sang it in 1965? You decide."

__________________________________________________



The Luciferian Deception

ALIEN INVASION:
Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth