Saturday, June 18, 2011

Rock Gods: Were the Beatles Angels?

Today, June 18, 2011, would have been Paul McCartney's 69th birthday. In honor of that occasion, I would like to indulge in some wild speculation as to whether he and the other Beatles were angels.

Timothy Leary once declared "that The Beatles [were] Prototypes of evolutionary agents sent by God, endowed with a mysterious power to create a new human species, a young race of laughing freemen." (As quoted in Shout! (1981) by Philip Norman, p. 365; and in An Encyclopedia of Quotations about Music (1981) by Nat Shapiro, p. 303 [Link])

The Maharishi Mahesh Yogi told "George and Deepak Chopra that he could never be upset at the Beatles because he always knew they were angels on earth."

Beatles: Angels on Earth?]
The photographer of some unpublished photos of the Beatles also noted something special about the Pre-Fab Four: "I knew they were going to be successful because they had an aura, and months later they were world famous..."

[Source: "
The Beatles new release: Unpublished pictures to go on display after they sat in an attic for 50 years"][Please support this blog by clicking on our sponsors' ad ~ Thanks!]

Charles Manson also believed the Beatles were angels, and that Revolution 9 from the White Album was a reference to the Holy Bible’s Revelations 9:

Revelations 9
From the Holy Bible

And in those days men shall seek death, and shall not find it; and
shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them.

And the shapes of the locusts like unto horses prepared unto battle;

And on their heads as it were crowns like gold, and their faces as the faces of men.
And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as of lions.

And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their
wings was like the thundering of many horses and chariots rushing into battle.

And they had tails like unto scorpions, with stingers; with their
tails they had power to harm people for five months.

The locusts = The locusts can be an interpretation of insects, bugs or maybe beetles. The Beatles

Faces of men = The Beatles being men had faces of men.
As the hair of women = The Beatles had faces of men and the hair of women. Very original and unique to them for a time.

Breastplates of iron = their guitars with metal strings strapped to their chests
Sound like thundering horses and chariots rushing into battle = the sound of The Beatle’s loud amplified music.

Their tails they had power = The Beatles’ amplifiers had electric chords,
power chords= This is interesting in that the tails were not described as having venom or poison but instead “power.”
[Source: The Lennon Prophecy: A New Examination of the Death Clues of the Beatles]

In this back-masking done by Sunssol, it appears that the Beatles reject money, and seek peace and passion:

I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie
I hate money, it's a lie

Ah...real tickets without peace
Ah, ah, ah, real tickets without peace
Ah, real tickets without
Here we burn and no peace
We now can reverse, now reversed
Ah...real tickets without peace
Ah, ah, ah, real tickets without peace
Ah, real tickets without
Heaven will watch it and we will all suffer
We now can reverse, now reversed...we will
We then have passion
At 6:20, this back-masking reveals "Paul is hare Krishna."

Krishna was the 8th incarnation of Vishnu.

...Saturn, the ascendant lord, acts as the Vishnu planet...
So it is clear that Saturn is representing Vishnu...
[Source: ]

George wrote "Gopala Krishna," which was never released:

It is said that "[B]irds often symbolize the divine. They are often viewed as gods in disguise, or else they are the vehicles of gods and goddesses..."

[Source: Swan at]

In Faul's video for the song, "This One," reference seems to be made to such an entity:

On the cover of Sgt. Pepper, is Faul trying to make a connection between himself and Vishnu/Krishna?

Terry Knight sang in "St. Paul":

"I think there's something wrong
It's taking you too long to change the world
Sir Isaac Newton told you it would fall."

Does this mean that Paul was supposed to change the world for the better but was thwarted by being replaced by someone who played for the "other team?"

David Icke forum member, Jo_6, made this observation:
...The original Beatles were a massive force for the light!
They were laughing lovely men who gave you a warm feeling inside, wrote ace music and obviously thoroughly enjoyed performing it live. I believe they were a massive force of goodness and love, with like an etheric gold shining energy coming from them.
The dark controlling forces do not let this be when it occurs in a way that effects the masses. (Look at JFK and Bob Marley). They do not want Light forces of truth and goodness to effect the masses and lift us up and wake us up. So they stamp on it and suppress it, snuff it out, nip it in the bud. And , perhaps this is what happened to the Beatles. They were a massive force that effected the masses, and they weren't going to 'co-operate' with the dark controlling they were took out. And to carry on with the juggernaut powerboat that was the Beatles, to keep cashing in and using them as a tool to manipulate the masses, they were replaced. Anyone close was bought off, or threatened, scared into submission...
[Source: David Icke Forum link]

Philip Norman, author of "Shout!," referred to the Beatles as "supernatural" in an interview at the beginning of this video:

These are all questions with no easy answers. They are interesting to ruminate and speculate upon, however.

The Luciferian Deception

Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth


  1. Hey Plastic Macca,

    Is there any information on the differences between Paul and Faul's widow's peaks? Since this is a genetics thing, I thought this would be a very interesting thing to look into. Paul does appear to have a peak in some photos. I believe this was already covered on another PID forum but I would love to see a post here!


  2. To elaborate further on my above post, DID Paul have a widow's peak? Or are there doctored photos of him with one? I also know that they are beginning to go after Paul's childhood photos too. I believe that I have seen a famous photo of Faul with a widow's peak.

    Hope I cleared things up a little. =)

  3. Plastic Macca?

    Can you help me with my question please about widow's peaks?

    Thank you!!

  4. I looked thru a bunch of pics of Paul last night, but I didn't see one w/out a moptop - so hard to tell about a widow's peak. There are still more to go thru. I'll get back to you :) Here's a thread of Paul pix you can look thru, tho, if you're so inclined:

  5. Hi. Are you going to comment on the new Iamaphoney vid for June 18? His last few came out only on the Private (Members) section of thewingedbeatle(dot)com, but this one is out in the public. It has a brief glimpse of a letter sent out about the "Twin" (stolen) Sgt Peppers albums, which is more elaborated in a video for Members, but this one does show that Macca (Faul) has "Billy Pepper" on his suitcase when travelling with Linda in a photo shown, among other things the video shows. The video is at Youtube watch?v=AJTvxGiDPGw . By the way, thanks for your nice find about Ringo's comments about his being the last Beatle.

  6. I should also add that one of the other vids recently (I think it's not this one, anyway) indicates how there used to be an "M" (for Mal?) on the Liverpool sculpture, above the now-missing trumpeting "angel". Finally, there is a blue car now shown with 06-66 on the license; I think this was not shown before; but maybe even if it was, some new clue is coming in the next or soon. Why? Because this is shown not in a flash but in a segment. The "Billy Pepper" on the suitcase of Macca with Linda from the 70s(?) is in this newest, but in a flash. It's the clearest of the Macca/Linda suitcase photo, so far, I think, but yet is only a flashed image. Thanks for your blog.

  7. I should mention: it's now clear in the new video, combined with private video and a brief flash in the new public one, that when the Sgt Peppers (the "Twin Peppers") were stolen from Paul's (Faul's) house 3 weeks before the release date, the person who stole them wrote a letter to Eppy signed "Beleth". And the name Beleth and its sigil from Crowley flashes in this new public video, along with the letter to Eppy about it (written June 8, one month after the steal, written, that is, 06-08-67, which in Britain would be written m-d-y, yes?).

  8. Hello.

    I have an analysis of the song "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" to share.

    See the love there that's sleeping - Paul is lying dead (and for some reason in post-1966 songs, Paul will be referred to a lot as "love")

    I look at the floor and I see it needs sweeping - The Truth must be uncovered

    Nobody told you how to unfold your love - Paul didn't live long enough to tell his true message

    Someone controlled you; They bought and sold you - Clearly about the switch and buying and selling Paul's idenity

    I look at the world and I notice it's turning/With every mistake we must surely being learning - Life goes on even though Paul has left this Earth

    I don't know how you were diverted - Switched out

    You were perverted too - This doesn't mean perverted in the sexual sense but in the sense that Paul's image was distorted by Faul into something it never was (to pervert the meaning of)

    You were inverted - Again with distortion of Paul's entire self as a result of replacement

    No one alerted you - Obviously Paul himself never expected his untimely death to happen

    The "Oh Ohs" are meant to resemble Paul's name. The "Yeah Yeah Yeahs" are meant to resemble their days together during Beatlemania.

    Tell me what you think of this analysis!

  9. ^ I think that is a fabulous analysis. Thanks for sharing!

  10. Please read my PID theory "Are the Beatles Angels on
    Earth? on Beatlesnumber9. I believe the death clues around Paul represents the last horse in the Book of Revelations that calls out death.

    Let me know what you think.

  11. I think that the above references to the Bible book of Revelation are a extrapolative beyond application. When rean within context, it refers to an the global army being sent against a certain group in the world. Anything else would be simply inference. Even re-reading the entire translation mentioned on this page shows what it actually means. The Beatles didn't have crowns of gold, lions' teeth, and their power cords didn't have stingers. And, it's true, their tails had power, but power to harm people - that is, with the stingers in them that were mentioned in the line previous.
    I don't believe they were angels - their history proves this out to be so. Do I think worse of them than others for all their past-time activities? Certainly not. That they were geniuses cannot be denied. More so that they were a major musical and cultural influence on the world.
    However, regardless of the kind of individuals they were off-stage and in their private lives, we most certainly do have a mystery in the most likely disappearance of James Paul McCartney and his being substituted by several look-alikes. The evidence for this is almost overwhelmingly air-tight and that which cannot be explained away ought to be brought before a grand jury. This, so that a proper investigation can be performed to find out further evidences one way or other so that the PID/PWR issue can be resolved. Having been a legal and historical researcher for over 15 years, I believe that there is more than enough forensic, legal and photographic evidence for not just this, but also a court case with fraud as the chief charge.

  12. Hi, I was watching an X-files episode called "All Souls" about Seraphim daughters and I saw this image:

    One of the angels showed a similar profile to John, in my opinion.
    I don't know where is this image come from.

    What do you think?

  13. Great material! Thanks! Did you get some of it from Billy's Back? That book is what got me excited about all of this stuff! It's at

    1. No, I never even heard of that book until you posted it. I think the author has culled some of my research, in fact. But he describes the book as "historical fiction," which I am not really interested in. I'm sure he has some real facts in there, but his "spin" is to turn the Beatles into agents of the Illuminati, which is not true. He doesn't seem to realize that ALL of the Beatles were replaced. But anyway...

  14. That reference to swans is a reference to the fact that, when babies, or cygnets, the little swans are not seen as being very attractive. Hence the story of "The Ugly Duckling". Their true beauty, which will emerge when they are full grown, is missing when they are babies. If you were truly an angel of God's here on this earth, you would appear as anyone else appears, seemingly with faults and all, or so it would seem. Your true beauty, like that of the baby swan, would not be as present with you as it would be if you were in heaven with God. So, as an angel literally 'in disguise', you could do your work for God unhindered, blending in with everyone else, except for that special something within you that some people might be allowed to, or able to, witness at times. That inner beauty, or light, is helpfully hidden, as is the true beauty of the swan when it is young.

    If Paul was truly an angel and not merely seemingly angelic, his earthly appearance, although spectacular in my opinion, would serve to hide his true inner beauty, so that he could live and work far more normally while here. It's the same for John, George, and Ringo. But, once they were all gathered together as the Beatles, the combination of the 4 of them caused their inner beauty to be far more visible to others. Once that happened, it was like 'magic', just not magic with a 'k'.

    Since I am not an adherent to eastern religions, as 'f'aul seems to show that he is, or that he wants others to believe he is, the 'god' that he is depicting as riding on the back of that particular swan in his video, to me does not depict anything good. Since he is an agent of 'the dark side', how could the creature he is singing about that is riding on the swan's back be a good thing?

    Swans, like silver, are things that represent hidden, and/or inner, beauty. Under the tarnish, silver shines brightly in all it's glory. Cygnets grow up, and turn into beautiful birds, who commit to their mates forever, no matter what. Now, to me, that's beauty all by itself. 'f'aul wants others to believe in what he is selling concerning the swans. I wouldn't buy into it myself, ever.


Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.