Sunday, December 16, 2018

Crushing It: Tina Foster discusses the latest on Paul Is Dead (PID)

Crushing It: Tina Foster discusses the Paul McCartney Is Dead CT (w/ Matt Z)


Attorney and author, Tina Foster, has researched the Paul is Dead conspiracy theory since 2008. She is the author of a comprehensive book on the subject entitled "Plastic Macca: The Secret Death and Replacement of Beatle Paul McCartney."

Watch on ODYSEE || BITCHUTE

Recorded Dec. 16, 2018


__________________________________________


9 comments:

  1. Tina baby,when is your wonderful book going to be available? I realise you work extremely hard and it takes an awful amount of time and effort,but I'm itching to read it. Also,you promised me a signed copy,can you still do that sweetheart? I would absolutely love a signed Tina Foster first issue of the Paul McCartney book. I hope you see this and reply. Much Peace and Love for this Christmas period baby. Craig x

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tina baby,how are you? When Is your Paul McCartney book going to be available baby? I know it takes an awful amount of time and effort,but I'm itching to read it. Can I still get a signed copy? I would absolutely love and cherish a signed Tina Foster book. Lots of Peace and Love for the Christmas period sweetheart. Craig x

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tina baby,when is your wonderful book going to be available? I realise you work extremely hard and it takes an awful amount of time and effort,but I'm itching to read it. Also,you promised me a signed copy,can you still do that sweetheart? I would absolutely love a signed Tina Foster first issue of the Paul McCartney book. I hope you see this and reply. Much Peace and Love for this Christmas period baby. Craig x

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really enjoyed this interview, Tina. Although I do follow the Sage of Quay channel to hear what Mike has to say, I totally agree with you that it is highly unlikely that the Uharriet book is what it is purported to be. I haven't actually read the Uharriet book, because I don't want to spend exorbitantly for a book and then feel 'had' in addition to feeling uneasy about some people completely buying into it hook, line, and sinker. There is, I think, a big exploitation factor in that book's phenomenon in how it was packaged and marketed, you know 'we had to make it fiction but it's all true' and the every other line 'code' or whatever it is --- designed to sucker people in. But I am very much looking forward to your book. I've followed your work and blog for many years. A side note: that Egypt Station garbage is so embarrassingly bad that it does damage to the memory and legacy of the real Paul, just like that embarrassingly trashy Kisses on the Bottom album. The insults to the artistry of the real Paul just keep getting worse every year until somehow Sir exits the scene and gets off media. The whole 'aren't we cute singing in the car with a fan' video that went viral was particularly nauseating as they 'sneaked' into the childhood home (John Halliday nowhere in sight, because they've gotten rid of him). Anyway, can't wait to read your book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bought "Billy's Back" half price from the author's website. I consider it worthless. "Kisses on the Bottom" was a pleasant surprise, Sir Paul crooning jazz with Diana Krall's band. He was on key and all that, his phrasing quite good. I've noticed a considerable drop off in vocals on his recent videos, arena rock isn't his thing anymore, but it's wonderful that he's still out there doing the oldies.

      Delete
    2. RE Jerry Rogers: "It's wonderful he is out there doing the oldies" .. IMHO, it's NOT wonderful .. it is criminal he is out there doing the oldies ! Also, some of the 'remastered' audios on some youtube videos are atrocious ! If you have originals, guard them - pass them along to people that will appreciate them. Hopefully, we are at the "tipping point" and that those in the know, will come forward.

      Delete
  5. Tina- I appreciate your research. I've somehow, out of the blue, I've stumbled upon all of this Paul/Faul stuff. It didn't take me long to be converted. The differences in the Paul and Faul are just too obvious to me. However certain characterics like the shape of the eyes are close enough for those not awake to not question the disparity. I have to admit though that those behind the whole shebang to replace him with lookalike Faul succeeded for the most part. He looks enough like Paul and sounds even more like Paul to pull the whole thing off. I tend to think there was some crossover though in '65-'66. I think that there might have times when Faul came in as Paul during Paul's last two years of life 1965-66 not only as his stunt double as the others had their own doubles to jump into limosines to throw off fans, but also to do interviews, and to do the ultimate: replace him on stage.

    Perhaps once Paul died or was replaced for good, the decision was made to keep the double so as not to induce a mass suicide from all the crazed girl fans. Perhaps the rest of the band agreed to go along with it as long as they could retain their right/privelege to create songs that expressed their feelings about it without them blatantly admitting to the hoax.

    Good job coming foward with all this. I've enjoyed watching the interviews on youtube. Good luck with the book.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you for your work Tina. Came upon the PID information summer 2017. "What? Paul died," I stammered. I do not listen to MSM so I thought I missed his passing then. Well, after learning about PID and seeing the photos, it is obvious he was replaced. I do believe that doubles were in place far prior to his passing. Mannerisms of the doubles and facial shape are give-aways.

    There is a very good looking double of Paul in a photo of him (the double) standing naked (!) behind a pillar with one of his legs clearly, deliberately "on display." Now, I would not have thought anything of this posture, other than it being ridiculous for a man, had I not seen Angelina J. do the same thing on the infamous "red carpet." Also, there is a photo of Jennifer Aniston on the cover of a magazine (2017-2018 ?) doing the same pose. Now, look at all the women over the years in the "entertainment" industry with one leg exposed. So, in that photo of the very good looking Paul double, the same pose. I believe there is a pose of Baphomet (?) or something similar somewhere online. Unbelievable!

    I cannot listen to songs beyond Revolver now. And, of course though, Revolver's "artwork" is creepy; now I know why. The Beatles must have been forced to name an album after a type of gun!

    Musically, everything has changed for me now. No wonder I have not liked post Revolver music. The lyrics of Let It Be have a new meaning. Faul will fall though and he knows it.

    I wonder if you will discuss all the women involved too. So, it was all orchestrated - all the women/ girlfriends/ wives at a certain point. There is a photo online of YOno meeting the Beatles in 1965! I do believe that the Beatles were used because they became so popular. They were innocent and genuinely did bring joy and exuberance into the their music and, consequently, the world as well. Long live the real Beatles and their music! Thank you for all your work.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Other than the Memoirs of Billy Shears book, there's another interesting "fiction" book (I put it in quotes as who knows what's true or not) about PID called A Day in the Life by L. John Perkins. Very interesting book and focuses on The Beatles major financial problems and how they were solved by a particular enormous "company". The part about the financial issues is really interesting and seems to bear out. Also clued me in that their lawyer, Jacobs, also was a "suicide" in the same period - very similar to Epstein. You might check it out. I don't think any of these books gives all the truth but I think some might be in there, at least the ideas are interesting.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.