neFAULim:
Foot Comps Between Paul McCartney and Faul
Tina Foster
In the realm of conspiracy theories, few tales are as captivating as the saga of Paul McCartney's secret death and impostor replacement. At the heart of this mystery lies an intriguing detail—discrepancies in McCartney's physical features, particularly his feet. For those who champion the notion that McCartney, as we know him today, is not the same man who once graced the stage with The Beatles, the differences in his toes serve as compelling evidence of a grand deception.
Advocates of the "Paul is Dead" theory point to photographic evidence spanning McCartney's life, suggesting a noticeable contrast in the number of toes on his feet. While images of the original Paul depict the standard five toes on each foot, the replacement McCartney, often referred to as “Faul," appears to boast an extra digit—six toes on his right foot. This anomaly is irrefutable proof of Paul’s impostor-replacement.
Critics who dismiss the alleged toe discrepancy as trivial fail to grasp its profound implications. The presence of an extra toe represents more than a mere anatomical oddity—it serves as a tangible marker of the McCartney switcheroo. Central to the analysis is the biological implausibility of growing extra toes in adulthood. Polydactyly, the presence of extra digits, typically arises from genetic factors or developmental anomalies during fetal development. The notion that Paul would spontaneously develop an additional toe in his mid-20s contradicts established principles of human biology and lacks empirical support.
Furthermore, the absence of documented cases wherein individuals grow extra toes in adulthood support the validity of the switch. Medical literature overwhelmingly supports the notion that polydactyly manifests early in life and remains stable throughout adulthood, making it highly improbable for Paul to grow an extra toe later in life.
Other indications of McCartney's transformation include changes in McCartney's shoe size; it increased from 8 to 9.5. This would be expected because Faul is a couple of inches taller than Paul was.
The toe discrepancy appears to lack a plausible biological explanation. The biological implausibility of growing extra toes in adulthood serves as compelling support for claims of Paul’s impostor-replacement by “Faul." The apparent presence of polydactyly in Faul, characterized by the extra toe, stands in stark contrast to Paul's lack of such a condition.
All of this and more is discussed in Plastic Macca: The Secret Death and Replacement of Beatle Paul McCartney.
_________________________