A Hard Day's Fight:
Bettina Krischbin's Paternity Claim Against Faul McCartney
Tina Foster
The Allegations
Bettina Krischbin alleged that Paul McCartney is her biological father, dating back to his early years in Hamburg. Krischbin claimed that Paul had had an affair with her mother, Erika Huebers, which led to her conception. In 1966, Paul began making child support payments to Huebers, implicitly acknowledging a connection to her daughter. While Paul never officially admitted paternity, these payments carry weight in the context of Krischbin's assertions and subsequent legal battles. However, those payments ceased with the emergence of Faul circa 1967. The case took a dramatic turn when Krischbin alleged that McCartney had orchestrated a deceitful maneuver during a paternity test in the 1980s. According to Krischbin, a stand-in, allegedly Faul, submitted the blood test, not Paul, resulting in a negative outcome and the dismissal of her paternity claim by a Berlin court in 1984.
Faul, a term coined by conspiracy theorists, refers to the notion that a look-alike or imposter assumed Paul’s identity following his death in 1966. The possibility of Faul's existence gains traction in the context of Krischbin's paternity claim.
Supporting Evidence
Krischbin's allegations gained traction with evidence suggesting fraud on McCartney's part. Central to her argument is a photo attached to a form entitled "Proof of Identity," signed by McCartney at the time of the blood test. Krischbin contends that the individual in the photo, though resembling Paul McCartney, has a different facial structure, indicating the presence of a doppelgänger. Furthermore, discrepancies in the signature on the form, allegedly penned by a right-handed person, fueled suspicions of forgery, given Paul’s well-documented left-handedness.
Despite the mounting evidence presented by Krischbin, the legal avenues available to her faced significant obstacles. The case was dismissed, but legal experts have suggested that it could be reopened on grounds of fraud.
Conclusion
With respect o Bettina Krischbin's paternity claim against McCartney, the emergence of Faul as a potential player offers a compelling explanation for the discrepancies in the case. While the notion of a doppelgänger assumes an air of conspiracy, it provides a plausible rationale for the deception surrounding the pivotal paternity test, leaving Bettina Krischbin's familial ties to the legendary musician mired in uncertainty.
All of this and more is discussed in Plastic Macca: The Secret Death and Replacement of Beatle Paul McCartney.
_________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.