Yesterday's Secrets:
The Timing of Faul McCartney’s Arrival
Tina Foster
The Beatles' last live performances in 1966 introduced the mysterious figure "Faul," with cryptic statements, height discrepancies, and facial inconsistencies fueling speculation about his identity. The decision to cease live performances, coupled with misleading photographs, adds an enduring enigma to this chapter in the Beatles' history.
The Seattle show on August 25, 1966, stands as a critical juncture in the timeline, capturing the band at the height of their popularity and notably marking the final performance with the original Paul McCartney. Speculation about the subsequent press conference in Los Angeles on August 28, where cryptic statements, height discrepancies, and subtle behavioral changes support the belief that this was Faul's first appearance.
The emergence of "Faul," a mysterious presence that entered the Beatles' narrative, has become a pivotal aspect of the band's enigmatic lore. The circumstances surrounding Paul's disappearance and Faul's debut, occurring at roughly the same time, have captured the attention of those delving into the mysteries of the band. Faul's introduction into the Beatles' story has evolved into an integral component of the broader mystique that envelops the Paul is Dead (PID) theory.
Faul's Debut and the Double Blue Jay Way:
Before the infamous Los Angeles press conference on August 28, 1966, the band experienced two days of downtime on August 26 and 27. The details surrounding those two mysterious days remain elusive, leaving fans and historians to ponder their significance.
Most likely, these two days were strategically used for the secret replacement of Paul McCartney with a look-alike known as "Faul." The downtime in Los Angeles on August 26 and 27, 1966, could have been a period for last-minute preparations for the impostor.
Adding an intriguing layer to this narrative is the analysis of the song "Blue Jay Way." The lyrics of the song suggest a sense of waiting for friends who never arrive, emphasizing a theme of anticipation and disappointment. This thematic connection to waiting aligns with the downtime in Los Angeles, sparking further speculation about how Paul never arrived after Seattle, while the stand-in was being prepped during this period.
The Height Discrepancy and Odd Gestures:
During the August 28, 1966 LA press conference, proponents of the Paul is Dead (PID) theory have highlighted key observations about "Paul." Notably, "Paul" appeared taller than the other Beatles, serving as a physical discrepancy supporting the idea of a replacement.
Another observation highlighted during the press conference was "Paul's" consistent gesture of putting his hand up to his face, as though casually attempting to hide it. This behavior could be an attempt to conceal facial differences between the original Paul and the imposter.
The nervous smoking with the right hand, which partially masked "Paul's" face, has also been noted during the press conference. This behavior is suspicious, as it could be seen as an attempt to draw attention away from facial features or as a reaction to the pressure of maintaining a deception. Additionally, Paul was left-handed, while Faul is right-handed, adding another layer of intrigue to the observations.
Furthermore, the placement of "Paul's" left hand at his belt raises eyebrows, as this hand position is considered a sign of the imposter having a different dominant hand. This observation reinforces the claims of a McCartney replacement.
During the August 28 press conference, a journalist at the event raised a significant question about the possibility of the Beatles using doubles as decoys.
In response to the journalist's inquiry regarding Beatle doubles, Faul, the replacement for Paul McCartney, responded cryptically. Faul's statement, "We know our real image which is nothing like our image," added another layer of mystery to the situation. The enigmatic nature of this reply fueled further intrigue surrounding the authenticity of the individuals present at the press conference.
Faul's words could be interpreted in different ways. Some might see it as an acknowledgment of the switch, suggesting that the public image of the Beatles did not accurately represent their true selves. Others may argue that it was a deliberate attempt to obfuscate the truth surrounding Paul’s replacement.
The journalist's question and Faul's response became significant components of the broader narrative that has fueled speculation about the Beatles using doubles and added to the mystery surrounding PID.
John Lennon's Cryptic Remark:
At the conclusion of the August 28 press conference, a moment of cryptic communication occurred between John Lennon and Faul, adding an intriguing layer to the ongoing speculation surrounding the Paul is Dead (PID) theory. Lennon's comment to Faul was enigmatic: "You can't always tell the would-be's from the real thing." This ambiguous statement further fueled suspicion and contributed to the growing narrative that there might be more to "Faul" than initially met the eye.
Lennon's words, with their mysterious undertones, are often cited by proponents of the PID theory as potential evidence of a hidden truth. The suggestion that distinguishing between the "would-be's" (impostors) and the "real thing" (original members) is not always straightforward implies a level of complexity and deception within the Beatles' public image.
Interpreting Lennon's comment within the context of the PID theory, enthusiasts might argue that it was a veiled acknowledgment of Faul's presence as a replacement for the original Paul McCartney. The notion that even those close to the situation were uncertain about the authenticity of the individuals involved adds an element of mystery to the narrative.
Misleading Photographs and Facial Consistency:
The revelation that photos from the Seattle show on August 25, 1966, attributed to the photographer Wallie Funk, have been recycled and presented as images from the Candlestick show on August 29, 1966, adds a layer of deception to the narrative surrounding the Paul is Dead (PID) theory. This discovery by Tina Foster raises questions about the authenticity of visual documentation from key Beatles performances during that period.
The recycling of photographs could be seen as an attempt to manipulate the historical record or confuse PID researchers by creating a false timeline. The intentional misrepresentation of events through visual media contributes to the mystery and speculation surrounding the replacement of Paul McCartney. This revelation underscores the challenges faced by those seeking to unravel the enigma of the Beatles' deception during this pivotal time in their history.
Furthermore, the mention of a circular mark or scar on "Paul's" face in San Francisco on August 29, consistent with later pictures of Faul rather than Paul from earlier in 1966, deepens the PID narrative. These physical inconsistencies support the idea of a replacement, as it suggests a notable change in Paul's appearance.
The Decision to Stop Live Performances:
The declaration made by Beatles manager Brian Epstein on September 26, 1966, that the band would never play live again marked a significant turning point in the group's career. This announcement has been a subject of speculation, especially in the context of the Paul is Dead (PID) theory. PID researcher, Joel Glazier's assertion that the decision was influenced by the inability of the new Paul (Faul) to perform in public only added to the mystery surrounding the cessation of live performances. Glazier stated, "The Beatles stopped performing live because the new Paul wasn't up to playing in public." This remark raises questions about the true reasons behind the band's historic decision.
The statement by Glazier raises questions about the real motivations behind Epstein's decision and the factors influencing the Beatles' shift away from live shows. This claim suggests that the replacement of Paul McCartney had a significant impact on the band's ability to continue performing live. This could be seen as evidence supporting the idea that Faul lacked the charisma or musical talent of the original Paul, and that fans would notice.
Conclusion:
The events surrounding the Beatles' last live performances in 1966 have fueled speculation about the timing of Paul's disappearance and Faul's debut. Various aspects contribute to the notion that Paul disappeared and "Faul" appeared at the end of August 1966. Cryptic statements made during the LA press conference, notably the comment by John Lennon about telling "would-be's from the real thing," have been interpreted by PID researchers as potential evidence that the replacement had already occurred. Height discrepancies and facial inconsistencies observed during this period have also fueled suspicions that Paul was no longer with us.
All of this and more is discussed in Plastic Macca: The Secret Death and Replacement of Beatle Paul McCartney.
_________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.