Discussion of PID/Faul McCartney/Beatles.
Adventures into Reality, March 6th, 2015
direct link
__________________________________________________
Tina Foster is the author of
Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.
Thursday, March 12, 2015
Adventures into Reality, March 6th, 2015 - Paul is Dead (PID)
Discussion of PID/Faul McCartney/Beatles.
Adventures into Reality, March 6th, 2015
direct link
Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.
Monday, February 23, 2015
Opperman Report | Tina Foster: Paul McCartney Is Dead/PID
Opperman Report | Tina Foster : Paul Is Dead 2015 02 20
Ed Opperman interview with Tina Foster about Paul McCartney having been impostor replaced in 1966. Topics include doubles and impostor replacements, weaponized music, the drug agenda, and the NWO.
Recorded on Feb. 20, 2015
Watch on BRIGHTEON or ODYSSEY
Listen to Audio file: https://www.spreaker.com/user/opperma...
__________________________________________________
Tina Foster is the author of
Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.
__________________________________________________
Tina Foster is the author of
Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.
Monday, February 16, 2015
Comment on CHIEDI CHI ERA QUELL BEATLE? / Ask Who Was the Beatle?
Gabriella Carlesi is an Italian forensic pathologist with a subspecialty in odontology (the study of teeth) [link to Wired article]. Her life's work involves identification of people through craniometry -- the scientific comparison of skull features. These scientific analyses have been carried out with Carlesi's partner, Francesco Gavazzeni, a computer scientist. Since the 1990s, this pair of forensic sleuths have used their dual expertise to work on a number of high profile forensic identification cases.
In 2008, Carlesi and Gavazzeni became interested in tackling the James Paul McCartney replacement conspiracy. They originally attempted to disprove the legend of Paul McCartney's replacement. However, the researchers discovered, much to their surprise, that they confirmed the replacement. After images of Paul McCartney, taken before as well as after late 1966, were compared, the professionals were shocked to discover that they simply did not match.
Their findings were published in the July 15, 2009 issue of WIRED ITALIA, the Italian edition of the U.S. magazine, WIRED. To ensure proper photographic comparison of Paul's face over time, the photos had to be re-sized to scale. The researchers chose to use the inter-pupillary distance to scale the facial features. After the photos were scaled to pupil distance, they were placed over each other for comparative visual examination. The photos taken before late 1966 did not match those taken after late 1966.
One of the first noted differences was the frontal jaw curvature. The replacement Paul's head was clearly more oblong than that of the original Paul. The differences found in the mandibular curve between the two sets of photos showed a stark discrepancy of over six per cent, well beyond the margin of error. In photos of the real Paul taken before late 1966, each side of Paul’s jaw was composed of two curves, whereas photos of the replacement Paul taken since 1967 demonstrated his face to be comprised of only a single curve. Carlesi pointed out that the width of the line that separated the original Paul’s lips was much different than that of the replacement Paul. The identifiable point at which the nose protruded from the face was also different. The dental features of the original Paul McCartney were also quite notably different compared to those of the replacement Paul.
The analysis also found wildly bizarre characteristics of the ears -- this consistent with the well-known phenomenon of photographic tampering carried out on many of the photos dated before late 1966, which were found to have been altered to make the facial features of the replacement Paul appear more like those of the original Paul. Doctor Carlesi was most amazed with the differences in the shape of the hard palate, which is unalterable without significant plastic surgery. Any surgery that would alter the hard palate shape would have necessitated approximately a year or more of recovery time. The man known as Paul McCartney is not historically known to have undergone any significant cranial surgery and, for sure, was never shown to have been in a year-long post-operative recovery phase. Aside from that, there would have been no obvious reason for the original Paul to have had his hard palate surgically fractured and reset.
The forensic researchers suggest that if the man referred to as Paul McCartney wanted to put an end to the rumors of his replacement, then he could submit to a DNA test -- clearly pointing to the infamous early 1980s paternity case in which the replacement Paul McCartney submitted a DNA sample in Germany. At that time, a German woman named Bettina Krischbin, known as the REAL Paul McCartney's REAL love child, claimed that her 1962 birth certificate shows that McCartney is her father. The DNA submitted by the Paul that showed up to submit the DNA sample did not match sufficiently with that of Ms. Bettina Krischbin (McCartney) [link to article about DNA test]. OF COURSE, the DNA did not match. The replacement Paul McCartney is NOT Bettina's birth father. If Paul was her father, it would have been the ORIGINAL Paul. Having the DNA of the REAL Paul McCartney, not of the replacement Paul, would be necessary to prove that the child was sired by the genuine James Paul McCartney.
After the original DNA test was found to not be a match, Bettina Krischbin accused Paul McCartney of sending a substitute to donate his DNA for the test. Well, in essence, the Paul McCartney that showed up to submit a DNA sample WAS INDEED a substitute, but he was not sent by the real Paul, whose whereabouts to most of the world have been unknown since late August 1966 [see link].
It was also claimed by Bettina Krischbin (McCartney) that the signature produced by the Paul McCartney who showed up to submit the DNA sample was that of a right-handed individual, not of the TRUE LEFT HANDED PAUL [see link].
In 2006, the German authorities re-opened the legal case for Krischbin's (McCartney's) paternity claim. If Paul McCartney was ultimately proven to be the father of Bettina Krischbin, then Ms. Krischbin would have been due to receive 10% of McCartney's estate upon his death. Clearly, the Krischbin legal team did not understand at the time that the REAL PAUL McCARTNEY was not available for DNA submission. If it had, then the members of that legal team would have known that Bettina Krischbin had ZERO chance of ever proving that she was the love child of the real Paul McCartney.
Interestingly, on July 15, 2009 (the same date on which WIRED ITALIA released Carlesi's and Gavazzeni's data which proved that Sir Paul McCartney was not the original Paul McCartney), the replacement McCartney gave an outdoor musical performance in New York City, and then later that day, appeared on the David Letterman Show at the Ed Sullivan Theatre/Studio 50 at CBS Manhattan (where the ORIGINAL Beatles - including the GENUINE James Paul McCartney - performed for millions of people on American television back on February 9, 1964) [see link].
During that Letterman interview, the imposter Paul McCartney nervously laughed with Letterman when they discussed the rumor of his death. The interview was even more interesting to those of us who understand the body language of liars, as the replacement Paul McCartney fully projected the body language of an abject liar during that interview, perceptible to even the most amateur of body language students.
This lie-fest included the ridiculous lie that the replacement Paul told Letterman's audience about taking his shoes off for the Abbey Road album cover photo shoot "because it was hot." The last thing any human being would want to do when it is truly hot outside is to remove one's shoes, which would expose the feet to burning hot ground temperature.
The timing of this July 15, 2009 Manhattan performance/Letterman appearance seems suspicious for being planned on the same day as the release of the Wired Magazine article, perhaps to help provide a distraction for the mind-controlled robots of the world by diverting their attention from the facts of the case.
This would all be laughable, except for the fact that the replacement McCartney has been besmirching the personality of the original Paul McCartney, who was a soft spoken, laid back, really cool guy and a champion of the people (pushing for A 432 Hz musical tuning and planning to write a musical score for Mark Lane's movie about JFK, Rush to Judgment).
If one considers that the replacement McCartney cavorted with Charles Manson via Terry Melcher before the Manson murders and that Malcolm Evans was executed in cold blood by insider Charles Higby a mere few hours after the replacement McCartney negotiated with Mal to pay him royalties for well-known contributions to the Sergeant Pepper album--it suggests that replacement McCartney is the opposite of his public persona of being a good guy.
CHIEDI CHI ERA QUELL BEATLE?
~ submitted by Anonymous
__________________________________________________
Tina Foster is the author of
Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.
The Luciferian Deception
 |
| ALIEN INVASION: Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth |
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
The Tragical History of PID - Part 2
In September 1969, Tim Harper reported on the latest West Coast college gossip, namely that McCartney had died in a car crash in 1966. On September 17, 1969, Harper’s article, “Is Beatle Paul McCartney Dead?” was published in the Drake Times-Delphic paper. Days later, college papers all over the country were running the story, and the news of McCartney’s demise swept across America.
Various clues as to Paul’s death were found by fans desperate for answers. One of the cluesters was Tom Zarski. He and his friends found back-masked messages on the White Album. On October 12, 1969, he called into Russ Gibb’s Detroit radio show to inform everyone that Beatle Paul was dead.
Zarski made it known that there was something fishy going on with Paul McCartney. According to Zarski, several tracks on the Beatles’ White Album contained backwards messages revealing the truth about Paul’s death. For example, “Revolution #9” was said to disclose the sounds of a fiery car crash when played backwards. The oft-repeated phrase “number nine, number nine” revealed the dark message, “turn me on, dead man, turn me, on dead man” when played backwards. The song, “I'm So Tired,” concealed the back-masked message, “Paul is a dead man, miss him, miss him, miss him.” More clues about McCartney’s death were found in other Beatles’ songs and album covers.
During the show, thousands of listeners were glued to the radio as Gibb and his callers discussed the evidence and what could be behind “The Great Cover-up.” One of those listeners was a student named Fred LaBour, who wrote a review of the Beatles’ album, Abbey Road, for the college newspaper the next day. On October 14, 1969, the Michigan Daily reported “McCartney dead; new evidence brought to light.” According to LaBour’s article, “Paul McCartney was killed in an automobile accident in early November, 1966 after leaving EMI recording studios tired, sad, and dejected.” LaBour reported that McCartney had been found four hours later, “pinned under his car in a culvert with the top of his head sheared off. He was deader than a doornail.” LaBour proclaimed the accident had been covered up and a double found to replace McCartney. 
The national press picked up the story, which “was quoted extensively everywhere. First the Detroit papers, then Chicago, then, by the weekend, both coasts.” On October 21, 1969, the London Times published a report on the “Paul is Dead” rumor. The next day, The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times ran the story. The possibility that McCartney could be dead was discussed on the “evening news of all three major television networks, and in prestigious national magazines such as Time and Life.”
Many people started to investigate the possibility of McCartney’s death and to look for clues on Beatles’ records, such as backwards messages and photographic clues. The sale of Beatles’ albums skyrocketed as those searching for clues bought copies just to play them backwards. More than 400 clues were eventually found.
__________________________________________________
Tina Foster is the author of
Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.
Sunday, January 18, 2015
"Let Me Weep": PID poem dedicated to James Paul McCartney (JPM) by Robin Gilmore
"Let Me Weep"
Robin Gilmore
James Paul McCartney
Ocean flow... Ocean deep
hold the love... let him sleep
hold the love... let him sleep
You left without a warning
Who could have seen it storming?
Who could have seen it storming?
No one to hear you singing your last song
They didn't understand you
They walked away and left you
They locked the doors..destroying every key
They walked away and left you
They locked the doors..destroying every key
Fly... please don't cry
Like a sea bird gently drifts upon the breeze
Let your wings catch the wind
Take you where you've never been
With the sunrise you are free
Like a sea bird gently drifts upon the breeze
Let your wings catch the wind
Take you where you've never been
With the sunrise you are free
Ocean Red... Ocean Blue
There's still a light that shines on you
Perhaps someday everyone will see
And we won't let it be
There's still a light that shines on you
Perhaps someday everyone will see
And we won't let it be
___________________________
Tina Foster is the author of
Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.
"I've done several interviews about the PID theory for my radio show. Tina Foster has done the most thorough comprehensive work on this subject matter."
~ Ed Opperman, The Opperman Report
The Luciferian Deception
|
| ALIEN INVASION: Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth |
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
"Sigh... all." --- A coincidence, synchronicity, or intentional?
Always looking for more than meets the eye on the cover of the Sgt. Pepper album, I found that if you list the first letter of the first name and the first letter of the last name of each person represented in sequence in the rows (top row, second row, third row, front row), but vertically in columns, you get...
YG AB SS SL
AC RP ?? PG ("Pretty Girl")
MW AH MM GH
LB DT PG JL
KS TS MB ST
WF DD TM RS
CJ TC OW PM
EP WB TP AE
FA TH LB JL
RM MM DL RS
VG WB JW PM
HH MB SC GH
SR SL IB BB
BD RL GS MD
OH HW AC
KM AS DD
HW LM ST
PY LC
JJ TL
??
Question: "How many Beatles died and were replaced?"
Answer: "(*sigh*) All."
Another interesting Pepper question...
In 1966, BBC Television produced a film of Alice in Wonderland that aired on December 28, 1966.
In the film, which is set in Victorian England, of course, there is a marching band and there are Victorian-era uniforms. There is a scene with a character dressed in uniform and the word "peppers" is spoken.
No doubt, the Beatles knew many of the figures involved in that production... Peter Sellers, Wilfrid Brambell, Leo McKern, and Ravi Shankar wrote the theme and performs on the soundtrack.
The film can be borrowed from Netflix in the USA. It seems to be the darkest and least child-friendly of any film version of the book. It was clearly made for adults. Low key on special effects, nevertheless it does seem somewhat psychedelic. Remember, in May of 1966, The Pretty Things performed their song, LSD, on BBC Radio, so there's no doubt that dropping acid was in the London culture during 1966. In March of that year, the butcher cover was shot. Revolver came out in August '66 in the UK, so psychedelic music was evolving in that year and would be in full bloom with the release of Sgt. Pepper in early 1967. Reportedly, the Beatles began using LSD in 1965.
So, my question is, did any Beatle visit the set of the BBC Alice in Wonderland production sometime in 1966? I don't know the production dates of the film, only its premiere date (28 Dec. 1966). I know the Beatles were touring the far east and then later, the USA, but they were in London on occasion, that year.
My suspicion is that the inspiration for the Victorian-era, military uniforms, the Victorian military brass band motif, and get this... "peppers" came from that 1966 BBC film version of Alice in Wonderland. The Beatles could have certainly gained access to the location or studio shoots (the 'peppers' scene is in studio).
Combine the fact that the Beatles were using LSD and somehow got a sneak peek of the shooting or editing of the film version of one of John Lennon's favorite books and you have possibly the roots of some essential elements of the Sgt. Pepper concept.
I recommend getting the film from Netflix and seeing for yourself. Here's a taste of it...
Ravi Shankar's theme...
Some scenes in slo-mo with recent music...
Another little bit of trivia... one really spooky scene is Alice walking down a row of tall windows with tattered, sheer curtains in a large, old building (no furniture)...
The scene was shot in an abandoned mental hospital used for 'shell shocked' men returning from the World Wars. Psychiatrist R. D. Laing had worked there. Laing was involved with Tavistock, this from wiki...
"In 1956 Laing went on to train on a grant at the Tavistock Clinic in London, widely known as a centre for the study and practice of psychotherapy (particularly psychoanalysis). At this time, he was associated with John Bowlby, D. W. Winnicott and Charles Rycroft. He remained at the Tavistock Institute until 1964.
One imagines that Dr. Laing and Dr. Asher were well acquainted and perhaps close colleagues. So, another interesting question would be, how and why did Jonathan Miller's film shoot of Alice in Wonderland for BBC Television find a shooting location connected with Tavistock and Drs. Laing and Asher?
Needless to say, I think the film seems to connect some dots, maybe.
Posted by Lewis Carroll
Posted by Lewis Carroll
__________________________________________________
|
The Luciferian Deception
|
| ALIEN INVASION: Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth |
Wednesday, December 24, 2014
Faul does best Paul McCartney impersonation - Jimmy Fallon
Jimmy Fallon recently told Faul McCartney that he does the best Paul McCartney impersonation. Why yes. Isn't that why he got the part? You have to read between the lines sometimes. They are just putting it out there that Faul is a double.
Paul McCartney Names His Favorite Ringo Starr Songs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_zf6kYvR8k
__________________________________________________
Tina Foster is the author of
Email Tina at faulconandsnowjob at hotmail dot com.
The Luciferian Deception
|
| ALIEN INVASION: Reptilians, Cetaceans and Frequency Wars on Planet Earth |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)