Ear, There, and Everywhere:
The Ears Betray Paul McCartney's Replacement
Tina Foster
The mystery surrounding Paul McCartney's replacement in late August 1966 has long captivated enthusiasts and skeptics alike. While theories abound, one particularly compelling piece of evidence revolves around discrepancies in McCartney's ears.Before delving into the controversy, it is essential to establish the baseline: Paul McCartney's original ears. Historical images depict Paul with attached earlobes, a seemingly mundane but crucial detail.
Yet, the crux of the matter lies in comparing Paul’s original ears with those belonging to his replacement, dubbed "Faul" by theorists. Faul's ears exhibit notable differences, from detached earlobes to inconsistencies in color and anatomy.
In a quest for truth, enthusiasts have scrutinized various visual evidence, including photographs and film footage from McCartney's performances with Wings in the late 1970s. These images reveal glaring disparities in ear morphology, suggesting the use of prosthetics or the presence of a different individual altogether.
A pivotal moment in this saga comes from a 1979 video where the McCartney doppelgänger exhibits an unattached earlobe, contrasting starkly with historical records. Furthermore, the ear's color appears incongruous with the surrounding facial skin, raising suspicions of prosthetic intervention.
Support for the replacement theory gained traction when two Italian forensics experts, Francesco Gavazzeni and Carlesi Gabriella, weighed in on the matter. In a 2009 article in WIRED Italia magazine, they highlighted discrepancies in the tragus, a small cartilage structure at the entrance of the ear canal. This anatomical feature serves as a distinctive identifier akin to a fingerprint, making it difficult to reconcile differences observed between Paul and his post-replacement counterpart.
The intrigue deepens with the introduction of biometric analysis. Researchers assert that ear biometrics offer a promising avenue for identification, given the fixed nature of ear shape and appearance. Even identical twins possess unique ear characteristics, further complicating attempts to dismiss discrepancies as mere anomalies.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Paul McCartney's replacement hinges on meticulous analysis of his ear morphology. While some dismiss the notion as conspiracy theory fodder, others continue to pore over evidence, seeking justice for Paul.
All of this and more is discused in Plastic Macca: The Secret Death and Replacement of Beatle Paul McCartney.
_________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.